• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学现状:利用公共卫生机制和决策流程为癌症全程的决策提供信息。

The State of the Science: Informing choices across the cancer journey with public health mechanisms and decision processes.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2010;49(2):144-52. doi: 10.3109/02841860903418532.

DOI:10.3109/02841860903418532
PMID:20001494
Abstract

Health decisions involve sharing information and making choices-even if the choice is to leave the decision to others. The way that information is delivered and understood by consumers across their cancer journey in turn influences the health decisions they take. A public health approach to the cancer journey considers the information needs of individuals and the structures and systems that facilitate the provision of credible and timely information. This paper examines emerging research that takes a public health approach to promote information-sharing and health decisions, identifies information-sharing mechanisms used by providers to facilitate shared decisions and evaluates decision support processes designed to improve information-sharing and self-care events. Evidence is presented to guide future research directions.

摘要

健康决策涉及信息共享和选择,即使选择是将决策留给他人。消费者在癌症治疗过程中接收和理解信息的方式反过来也会影响他们做出的健康决策。从公共卫生角度出发考虑癌症治疗过程中的个体信息需求以及提供可信和及时信息的结构和系统。本文研究了采用公共卫生方法促进信息共享和健康决策的新兴研究,确定了提供者用来促进共同决策的信息共享机制,并评估了旨在改善信息共享和自我护理事件的决策支持流程。提供了证据以指导未来的研究方向。

相似文献

1
The State of the Science: Informing choices across the cancer journey with public health mechanisms and decision processes.科学现状:利用公共卫生机制和决策流程为癌症全程的决策提供信息。
Acta Oncol. 2010;49(2):144-52. doi: 10.3109/02841860903418532.
2
Editorial comment on "How do interventions design to improve provider-patient communication work? Illustrative applications of a framework for communication" and "The State of the Science: Informing choices across the cancer journey with public health mechanisms and decision processes".关于《旨在改善医患沟通的干预措施如何发挥作用?沟通框架的实例应用》及《科学现状:利用公共卫生机制和决策过程为癌症全程中的选择提供信息》的编辑评论
Acta Oncol. 2010;49(2):153-4. doi: 10.3109/02841860903464023.
3
Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups.探讨不同教育程度和功能性健康素养群体中患者在医疗决策中的参与情况。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(12):1805-12. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.056. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
4
Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study).前列腺癌筛查决策:全国医疗决策调查(DECISIONS研究)结果
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28;169(17):1611-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.262.
5
Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language.循证患者选择:一份通俗易懂的前列腺癌决策辅助工具
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 Jun 20;5:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-16.
6
Assessing the role of evidence in patients' evaluation of complementary therapies: a quality study.评估证据在患者对补充疗法评估中的作用:一项质量研究。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2007 Dec;6(4):345-53. doi: 10.1177/1534735407309482.
7
[Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation].[共同决策:增强患者参与康复的一种方法]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Jun;42(3):129-35. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40097.
8
Information needs, sources of information, and decisional roles in women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性的信息需求、信息来源及决策角色。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996 May;23(4):691-6.
9
Provision of individualized information to men and their partners to facilitate treatment decision making in prostate cancer.向男性及其伴侣提供个性化信息,以促进前列腺癌治疗决策的制定。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):107-14. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.107-114.
10
Perspectives on evidence-based practice from consumers in the US public mental health system.美国公共精神卫生系统中消费者对循证实践的看法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):699-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01020.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Preparedness for colorectal cancer surgery and recovery through a person-centred information and communication intervention - A quasi-experimental longitudinal design.通过以人为中心的信息和沟通干预来准备结直肠癌手术和康复 - 一项准实验性纵向设计。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0225816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225816. eCollection 2019.
2
Consumers' perceptions about and use of the internet for personal health records and health information exchange: analysis of the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey.消费者对互联网用于个人健康记录和健康信息交换的认知与使用:2007年健康信息国家趋势调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 18;12(4):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1668.