Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA.
Evolution. 2010 May;64(5):1446-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00913.x. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
Studying how the fitness benefits of mutualism differ among a wide range of partner genotypes, and at multiple spatial scales, can shed light on the processes that maintain mutualism and structure coevolutionary interactions. Using legumes and rhizobia from three natural populations, I studied the symbiotic fitness benefits for both partners in 108 plant maternal family by rhizobium strain combinations. Genotype-by-genotype (G x G) interactions among local genotypes and among partner populations determined, in part, the benefits of mutualism for both partners; for example, the fitness effects of particular rhizobium strains ranged from uncooperative to mutualistic depending on the plant family. Correlations between plant and rhizobium fitness benefits suggest a trade off, and therefore a potential conflict, between the interests of the two partners. These results suggest that legume-rhizobium mutualisms are dynamic at multiple spatial scales, and that strictly additive models of mutualism benefits may ignore dynamics potentially important to both the maintenance of genetic variation and the generation of geographic patterns in coevolutionary interactions.
研究互利共生的适应性益处如何在广泛的伙伴基因型和多个空间尺度上存在差异,可以揭示维持互利共生和结构协同进化相互作用的过程。我使用来自三个自然种群的豆科植物和根瘤菌,通过根瘤菌菌株组合研究了 108 个植物母系中对两个合作伙伴的共生适应性益处。本地基因型之间以及合作伙伴种群之间的基因型与基因型(G x G)相互作用部分决定了两个合作伙伴互利共生的益处;例如,特定根瘤菌菌株的适应性效应取决于植物家族,从非合作到互利共生不等。植物和根瘤菌适应性益处之间的相关性表明,两个合作伙伴的利益之间存在权衡,因此存在潜在的冲突。这些结果表明,豆科植物-根瘤菌互利共生在多个空间尺度上是动态的,并且严格的互利共生益处加性模型可能会忽略对维持遗传变异和协同进化相互作用中地理模式生成都很重要的动态。