Catherall-Ostler Andrew M, Dixit Tanmay
Homerton College University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.
Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jul 10;15(7):e71736. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71736. eCollection 2025 Jul.
There is an unrecognised disagreement between those studying molecular evolution and those studying behavioural evolution. Only natural selection is ordinarily thought to systematically increase behavioural complexity, but molecular biologists are increasingly recognising a second driver of complexity-constructive neutral evolution (CNE). CNE occurs when a system contains components that buffer the effects of otherwise-deleterious mutations, allowing such mutations to spread. This increases the complexity of the system due to the dependency that now exists between the buffering component and the mutated component. A probabilistic 'ratchet' means this process is more likely to repeat itself than reverse, and hence complexity increases without necessarily any gain in function. Here, we argue that CNE operates not only at the molecular level, but also affects whole organism behaviour. We suggest that behaviour's polygenic architecture, flexibility, and ability to mitigate the impact of otherwise-deleterious mutations mean that behaviour is particularly likely to evolve via CNE. We summarise the evidence that supports this hypothesis as well as suggesting how it could be tested further. We conclude that CNE must be considered alongside selective explanations for increases in behavioural complexity.
研究分子进化的学者与研究行为进化的学者之间存在一种未被认识到的分歧。通常只有自然选择被认为会系统性地增加行为复杂性,但分子生物学家越来越认识到复杂性的第二个驱动因素——建设性中性进化(CNE)。当一个系统包含能够缓冲其他有害突变影响的成分,从而使此类突变得以传播时,CNE就会发生。由于缓冲成分与突变成分之间现在存在依赖性,这就增加了系统的复杂性。一种概率性的“棘轮效应”意味着这个过程更有可能重复而非逆转,因此复杂性增加而功能不一定有任何提升。在此,我们认为CNE不仅在分子层面起作用,还会影响整个生物体的行为。我们认为行为的多基因结构、灵活性以及减轻其他有害突变影响的能力意味着行为特别有可能通过CNE进化。我们总结了支持这一假设的证据,并提出了如何进一步进行检验。我们得出结论,在解释行为复杂性增加时,必须将CNE与选择性解释一并考虑。