Gill James R, Scordi-Bello Irini A
New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner and Department of Forensic Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 2010 Jan;55(1):77-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01227.x. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
We retrospectively analyzed 100 deaths because of suspicions and concerns expressed by the family. We compared the preautopsy cause of death, as determined by a thorough review of the clinical data and circumstances, to the autopsy-derived cause of death. In the majority (91/100), the preautopsy and postautopsy proximate causes of death were in agreement. In 9%, the autopsy provided information that resulted in a proximate cause of death different than anticipated. In four instances, the manner of death also was incorrect and was determined to be an accident rather than the originally presumed natural. No homicide or suicide would have been misclassified. In another nine instances, where the premortem and postmortem proximate causes of death were in agreement, the autopsy provided a specific mechanism of death. With a quality initial medicolegal death investigation, a subset of sudden deaths in adults may be reliably certified without an autopsy.
由于家属表达的怀疑和担忧,我们对100例死亡病例进行了回顾性分析。我们将通过全面审查临床数据和情况确定的尸检前死因与尸检得出的死因进行了比较。在大多数情况下(91/100),尸检前和尸检后的直接死因是一致的。在9%的病例中,尸检提供的信息导致直接死因与预期不同。在4个案例中,死亡方式也不正确,被确定为意外而非最初推测的自然死亡。没有杀人或自杀会被错误分类。在另外9个案例中,生前和死后的直接死因一致,尸检提供了具体的死亡机制。通过高质量的初始法医学死亡调查,一部分成人猝死病例可以在没有尸检的情况下得到可靠认证。