• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

白喉-破伤风-百日咳疫苗与严重神经系统疾病:流行病学证据的最新综述

Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine and serious neurologic illness: an updated review of the epidemiologic evidence.

作者信息

Wentz K R, Marcuse E K

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1991 Mar;87(3):287-97.

PMID:2000268
Abstract

A widespread impression that DTP vaccine does cause brain damage has been based first on historical precedent--smallpox and rabies vaccines were recognized as sometimes causing devastating neurologic illness; analogy to pertussis--the disease can cause encephalopathy; and more recently on anecdotal evidence, particularly case series. A noncausal relationship--coincidence--could explain the temporal relation between DTP vaccine and neurologic illness, inasmuch as DTP vaccine is given at the age of emergence of idiopathic neurologic disease. The relationship between DTP vaccine and neurologic illness lacks specificity. Case series have had an impact on both physicians' and the lay public's impression of the safety of pertussis vaccine greatly out of proportion to their scientific importance. Case series can be useful for generating hypotheses but cannot provide evidence that pertussis vaccine is causally related to acute neurologic illness or brain damage. Observational studies using cohort and ecologic designs did not find an association between DTP vaccine and serious neurologic illness, but they were not powerful enough to detect an association as rare as that observed by the NCES investigators. The case-control design offers the best chance of providing causal evidence regarding DTP vaccine and serious neurologic illness. The NCES is the only published case-control study of this issue. This study found a rare association between DTP vaccine and some types of acute neurologic illness. Bias and chance are unlikely to account entirely for the association demonstrated by the NCES. However, the association has not yet been replicated by other case-control studies. The NCES does not demonstrate that DTP vaccine causes permanent brain damage.

摘要

一种普遍的印象是,百白破疫苗确实会导致脑损伤,其依据首先是历史先例——天花和狂犬病疫苗被认为有时会引发严重的神经系统疾病;与百日咳的类比——这种疾病可导致脑病;以及最近基于轶事证据,特别是病例系列。一种非因果关系——巧合——可以解释百白破疫苗与神经系统疾病之间的时间关系,因为百白破疫苗是在特发性神经系统疾病出现的年龄接种的。百白破疫苗与神经系统疾病之间的关系缺乏特异性。病例系列对医生和普通公众对百日咳疫苗安全性的印象产生了极大影响,其影响程度与其科学重要性极不相称。病例系列有助于提出假设,但无法提供证据证明百日咳疫苗与急性神经系统疾病或脑损伤存在因果关系。采用队列和生态学设计的观察性研究未发现百白破疫苗与严重神经系统疾病之间存在关联,但它们的效力不足以检测到像国家儿童疫苗伤害法案(NCES)调查人员所观察到的那样罕见的关联。病例对照设计为提供有关百白破疫苗与严重神经系统疾病的因果证据提供了最佳机会。NCES是关于这个问题唯一已发表的病例对照研究。这项研究发现百白破疫苗与某些类型的急性神经系统疾病之间存在罕见关联。偏差和偶然性不太可能完全解释NCES所证明的这种关联。然而,其他病例对照研究尚未重复这一关联。NCES并未证明百白破疫苗会导致永久性脑损伤。

相似文献

1
Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine and serious neurologic illness: an updated review of the epidemiologic evidence.白喉-破伤风-百日咳疫苗与严重神经系统疾病:流行病学证据的最新综述
Pediatrics. 1991 Mar;87(3):287-97.
2
Pertussis vaccine effectiveness among children 6 to 59 months of age in the United States, 1998-2001.1998 - 2001年美国6至59个月大儿童的百日咳疫苗效力
Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e285-94. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2759.
3
Encephalopathy after whole-cell pertussis or measles vaccination: lack of evidence for a causal association in a retrospective case-control study.全细胞百日咳或麻疹疫苗接种后出现的脑病:一项回顾性病例对照研究中缺乏因果关联的证据。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Sep;25(9):768-73. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000234067.84848.e1.
4
Safety and immunogenicity of a Haemophilus influenzae type B polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine combined with diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines in Thai infants.B 型流感嗜血杆菌多糖-破伤风类毒素结合疫苗与白喉、破伤风和百日咳疫苗联合使用在泰国婴儿中的安全性和免疫原性
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1997 Mar;28(1):91-8.
5
Minor adverse events in a comparative efficacy trial in Germany in infants receiving either the Lederle/Takeda acellular pertussis component DTP (DTaP) vaccine, the Lederle whole-cell component DTP (DTP) or DT vaccine. The Pertussis Vaccine Study Group.在德国进行的一项比较疗效试验中,接受礼来/武田无细胞百日咳组分白喉破伤风百日咳疫苗(DTaP)、礼来全细胞组分白喉破伤风百日咳疫苗(DTP)或白喉破伤风疫苗(DT)的婴儿出现的轻微不良事件。百日咳疫苗研究组。
Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:113-8.
6
Serious neurological conditions following pertussis immunization: an analysis of endotoxin levels, the vaccine adverse events reporting system (VAERS) database and literature review.百日咳免疫接种后的严重神经系统疾病:内毒素水平分析、疫苗不良事件报告系统(VAERS)数据库及文献综述
Pediatr Rehabil. 2002 Jul-Sep;5(3):177-82. doi: 10.1080/1363849021000054031.
7
Thimerosal exposure in infants and developmental disorders: a retrospective cohort study in the United kingdom does not support a causal association.婴儿硫柳汞暴露与发育障碍:英国的一项回顾性队列研究不支持因果关联。
Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):584-91. doi: 10.1542/peds.2003-1177-L.
8
Safety and immunogenicity of two Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccines (PRP-T) given with diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine to young Papua New Guinean children.在巴布亚新几内亚幼儿中,两种b型流感嗜血杆菌多糖-破伤风类毒素结合疫苗(PRP-T)与白喉-破伤风-百日咳疫苗联合接种的安全性和免疫原性。
P N G Med J. 2001 Mar-Jun;44(1-2):6-16.
9
Severe adverse events in a comparative efficacy trial in Germany in infants receiving either the Lederle/Takeda acellular pertussis component DTP (DTaP) vaccine, the Lederle whole-cell component DTP (DTP) or DT vaccine. The Pertussis Vaccine Study Group.在德国进行的一项比较疗效试验中,对接受礼来/武田无细胞百日咳组分白喉破伤风百日咳疫苗(DTaP)、礼来全细胞组分白喉破伤风百日咳疫苗(DTP)或白喉破伤风疫苗(DT)的婴儿出现的严重不良事件。百日咳疫苗研究组。
Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:83-9.
10
Risk of serious acute neurological illness after immunization with diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine. A population-based case-control study.白喉-破伤风-百日咳疫苗接种后发生严重急性神经系统疾病的风险。一项基于人群的病例对照研究。
JAMA. 1994 Jan 5;271(1):37-41.

引用本文的文献

1
A case-control study of autism and mumps-measles-rubella vaccination using the general practice research database: design and methodology.一项利用全科医疗研究数据库进行的自闭症与麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹疫苗接种的病例对照研究:设计与方法
BMC Public Health. 2001;1:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-1-2. Epub 2001 Feb 15.
2
Routine childhood immunisation: is it worth it?儿童常规免疫接种:值得吗?
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Mar;3(3):183-91. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199303030-00002.
3
Acellular pertussis vaccines. Towards an improved safety profile.无细胞百日咳疫苗。迈向更优的安全性概况。
Drug Saf. 1996 Nov;15(5):311-24. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199615050-00002.
4
Diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy in children and adolescents.儿童及青少年癫痫的诊断与治疗
Drugs. 1996 Mar;51(3):399-414. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651030-00005.
5
Pertussis vaccines--1993.百日咳疫苗——1993年。
Eur J Pediatr. 1993 Jun;152(6):462-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01955049.
6
Statement on pertussis immunization. National Advisory Committee on Immunization.关于百日咳免疫接种的声明。国家免疫咨询委员会。
CMAJ. 1993 Oct 15;149(8):1132-7.
7
Pertussis immunisation and serious acute neurological illnesses in children.儿童百日咳免疫接种与严重急性神经系统疾病
BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1171-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1171.