• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Acute myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes in specialty and general hospitals: analysis of state inpatient data.专科医院和综合医院的急性心肌梗死和冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗结果:州立住院患者数据分析。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb;45(1):62-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01066.x. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
2
Cardiac revascularization in specialty and general hospitals.专科医院和综合医院的心脏血运重建。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 7;352(14):1454-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042325.
3
Insurance status of patients admitted to specialty cardiac and competing general hospitals: are accusations of cherry picking justified?入住专科心脏病医院和其他综合医院的患者的保险状况:对挑选患者的指责是否合理?
Med Care. 2008 May;46(5):467-75. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31816c43d9.
4
Acute myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure outcomes at specialty cardiac hospitals.专科心脏病医院的急性心肌梗死和充血性心力衰竭治疗结果
Circulation. 2007 Nov 13;116(20):2280-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.709220. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
5
Do specialty cardiac hospitals have greater adherence to acute myocardial infarction and heart failure process measures? An empirical assessment using Medicare quality measures: quality of care in cardiac specialty hospitals.专科心脏病医院对急性心肌梗死和心力衰竭诊疗流程指标的遵循情况更好吗?一项使用医疗保险质量指标的实证评估:心脏病专科医院的医疗质量。
Am Heart J. 2008 Jul;156(1):155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.02.018. Epub 2008 May 27.
6
Comorbidity and outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery at cardiac specialty hospitals versus general hospitals.心脏专科医院与综合医院冠状动脉搭桥手术的合并症及治疗结果
Med Care. 2007 Aug;45(8):720-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180537192.
7
A comparison of total hip and knee replacement in specialty and general hospitals.专科医院与综合医院全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Aug;89(8):1675-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00873.
8
Association of Rankings With Cardiovascular Outcomes at Top-Ranked Hospitals vs Nonranked Hospitals in the United States.美国排名顶尖医院与非排名医院的排名与心血管结局的关系。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;3(12):1222-1225. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3951.
9
Treatment and outcome of myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without invasive capability. Investigators in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction.具备和不具备介入治疗能力的医院中急性心肌梗死的治疗与转归。国家急性心肌梗死注册研究的研究者们。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Feb;35(2):371-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00505-7.
10
Optimal timing of revascularization: transmural versus nontransmural acute myocardial infarction.血运重建的最佳时机:透壁性与非透壁性急性心肌梗死
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Apr;71(4):1197-202; discussion 1202-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02425-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between hospital specialization and health outcomes in patients with nonsurgical spinal joint disease in South Korea: A nationwide evidence-based study using national health insurance data.韩国非手术脊柱关节疾病患者的医院专科化与健康结局的关系:基于全国健康保险数据的全国性循证研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Aug 13;100(32):e26832. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026832.
2
Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in US hospitals with varying structural characteristics: analysis of the NCDR®.美国不同结构性特征医院的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果:NCDR®分析。
Am Heart J. 2012 Feb;163(2):222-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.10.010.
3
The impact of hospital cardiac specialization on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of medicare claims data.医院心脏专科化对冠状动脉搭桥手术后结局的影响:医疗保险理赔数据分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Nov;3(6):607-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.943282. Epub 2010 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of date stamping on patient safety measurement in patients undergoing CABG: experience with the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators.日期标记对接受冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的患者安全测量的影响:美国医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标的经验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug 13;8:176. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-176.
2
Acute myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure outcomes at specialty cardiac hospitals.专科心脏病医院的急性心肌梗死和充血性心力衰竭治疗结果
Circulation. 2007 Nov 13;116(20):2280-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.709220. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
3
Comorbidity and outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery at cardiac specialty hospitals versus general hospitals.心脏专科医院与综合医院冠状动脉搭桥手术的合并症及治疗结果
Med Care. 2007 Aug;45(8):720-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180537192.
4
Differences in mortality and use of revascularization in black and white patients with acute MI admitted to hospitals with and without revascularization services.入住有或没有血运重建服务的医院的急性心肌梗死黑人和白人患者在死亡率和血运重建使用方面的差异。
JAMA. 2007 Jun 13;297(22):2489-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.22.2489.
5
Specialty-service lines: salvos in the new medical arms race.专科服务领域:新医疗军备竞赛中的齐射
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Sep-Oct;25(5):w337-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w337. Epub 2006 Jul 25.
6
Administrative versus clinical data for coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards: the view from California.冠状动脉搭桥手术报告卡的管理数据与临床数据:来自加利福尼亚的视角
Med Care. 2006 Jul;44(7):687-95. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000215815.70506.b6.
7
An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction.一种适用于根据急性心肌梗死患者30天死亡率剖析医院绩效的行政索赔模型。
Circulation. 2006 Apr 4;113(13):1683-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.611186. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
8
An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with heart failure.一种适用于根据心力衰竭患者30天死亡率剖析医院绩效的行政索赔模型。
Circulation. 2006 Apr 4;113(13):1693-701. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.611194. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
9
Intolerable risk, irreparable harm: the legacy of physician-owned specialty hospitals.无法容忍的风险,无法弥补的伤害:医师拥有的专科医院的遗留问题。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jan-Feb;25(1):130-3. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.130.
10
The effects of cardiac specialty hospitals on the cost and quality of medical care.心脏专科医院对医疗成本和质量的影响。
J Health Econ. 2006 Jul;25(4):702-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.11.001. Epub 2005 Dec 6.

专科医院和综合医院的急性心肌梗死和冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗结果:州立住院患者数据分析。

Acute myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes in specialty and general hospitals: analysis of state inpatient data.

机构信息

Division of General Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City VA Medical Center, Mail Stop 152, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb;45(1):62-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01066.x. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01066.x
PMID:20002764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2813437/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Compare characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized in specialty cardiac and general hospitals for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

DATA

2000-2005 all-payor administrative data from Arizona, California, Texas, and Wisconsin.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified patients admitted to specialty and competing general hospitals with AMI or CABG and compared patient demographics, comorbidity, and risk-standardized mortality in specialty and general hospitals.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Specialty hospitals admitted a lower proportion of women and blacks and treated patients with less comorbid illness than general hospitals. Unadjusted in-hospital AMI mortality for Medicare enrollees in specialty and general hospitals was 6.1 and 10.1 percent (p<.0001) and for non-Medicare enrollees was 2.8 and 4.0 percent (p<.04). Unadjusted in-hospital CABG mortality for Medicare enrollees in specialty and general hospitals was 3.2 and 4.7 percent (p<.01) and for non-Medicare enrollees was 1.1 and 1.8 percent (p=.02). After adjusting for patient characteristics and hospital volume, risk-standardized in-hospital mortality for all AMI patients was 2.7 percent for specialty hospitals and 4.1 percent for general hospitals (p<.001) and for CABG was 1.5 percent for specialty hospitals and 2.0 percent for general hospitals (p=.07).

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital mortality in specialty hospitals was lower than in general hospitals for AMI but similar for CABG. Our results suggest that specialty hospitals may offer significantly better outcomes for AMI but not CABG.

摘要

目的

比较因急性心肌梗死(AMI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)住院的专科心脏医院和综合医院患者的特征和结局。

数据

来自亚利桑那州、加利福尼亚州、得克萨斯州和威斯康星州的 2000-2005 年全付费管理数据。

研究设计

我们确定了因 AMI 或 CABG 入住专科和竞争综合医院的患者,并比较了专科和综合医院患者的人口统计学特征、合并症和风险标准化死亡率。

主要发现

专科医院收治的女性和黑人比例较低,合并症较少。专科和综合医院 Medicare 参保患者的未调整院内 AMI 死亡率分别为 6.1%和 10.1%(p<.0001),非 Medicare 参保患者分别为 2.8%和 4.0%(p<.04)。专科和综合医院 Medicare 参保患者的未调整院内 CABG 死亡率分别为 3.2%和 4.7%(p<.01),非 Medicare 参保患者分别为 1.1%和 1.8%(p=.02)。在调整患者特征和医院容量后,所有 AMI 患者的风险标准化院内死亡率为专科医院 2.7%,综合医院 4.1%(p<.001),CABG 为专科医院 1.5%,综合医院 2.0%(p=.07)。

结论

专科医院的 AMI 院内死亡率低于综合医院,但 CABG 院内死亡率相似。我们的研究结果表明,专科医院可能为 AMI 患者提供显著更好的结局,但对 CABG 患者则不然。