Popescu Ioana, Vaughan-Sarrazin Mary S, Rosenthal Gary E
Center for Research in the Implementation of Innovative Strategies in Practice (CRIISP), Iowa City VA Medical Center, USA.
JAMA. 2007 Jun 13;297(22):2489-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.22.2489.
Racial differences in the use of coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been widely reported. However, few studies have examined patterns of care for AMI patients admitted to hospitals with and without revascularization services.
To compare rates of hospital transfer, coronary revascularization, and mortality after AMI for black and white patients admitted to hospitals with and without revascularization services.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of 1,215,924 black and white Medicare beneficiaries aged 68 years and older, admitted with AMI between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2005, to 4627 US hospitals with and without revascularization services.
For patients admitted to nonrevascularization hospitals, transfer to another hospital with revascularization services; for all patients, risk-adjusted rates of 30-day coronary revascularization and 1-year mortality.
Black patients admitted to hospitals without revascularization were less likely (25.2% vs 31.0%; P<.001) to be transferred. Black patients admitted to hospitals with or without revascularization services were less likely to undergo revascularization than white patients (34.3% vs 50.2% and 18.3% vs 25.9%; P<.001) and had higher 1-year mortality (35.3% vs 30.2% and 39.7% vs 37.6%; P<.001). After adjustment for sociodemographics, comorbidity, and illness severity, blacks remained less likely to be transferred (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.81; P<.001) and undergo revascularization (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.69-0.74; P<.001; and HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.65-0.70; P<.001 in hospitals with and without revascularization, respectively). Risk-adjusted mortality was lower for blacks during the first 30 days after admission (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93; P<.001; and HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.92; P<.001 in hospitals with and without revascularization, respectively) but was higher (P<.001) thereafter.
Black patients admitted to hospitals with and without coronary revascularization services are less likely to receive coronary revascularization. The higher long-term mortality of black patients may reflect the lower use of revascularization or other aspects of AMI care.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)后冠状动脉血运重建治疗的种族差异已有广泛报道。然而,很少有研究探讨入住具备或不具备血运重建服务医院的AMI患者的治疗模式。
比较入住具备或不具备血运重建服务医院的黑人和白人AMI患者的医院转诊率、冠状动脉血运重建率及死亡率。
设计、地点和参与者:对2000年1月1日至2005年6月30日期间因AMI入住美国4627家具备或不具备血运重建服务医院的1215924名68岁及以上黑人和白人医疗保险受益人的回顾性队列研究。
对于入住无血运重建服务医院的患者,转至另一家有血运重建服务的医院;对于所有患者,30天冠状动脉血运重建的风险调整率和1年死亡率。
入住无血运重建服务医院的黑人患者转诊可能性较小(25.2%对31.0%;P<0.001)。入住具备或不具备血运重建服务医院的黑人患者接受血运重建的可能性均低于白人患者(分别为34.3%对50.2%和18.3%对25.9%;P<0.001),且1年死亡率更高(分别为35.3%对30.2%和39.7%对37.6%;P<0.001)。在对社会人口统计学、合并症和疾病严重程度进行调整后,黑人患者转诊可能性仍然较小(风险比[HR],0.78;95%置信区间[CI],0.75 - 0.81;P<0.001),接受血运重建的可能性也较小(HR,0.71;95%CI,0.69 - 0.74;P<0.001;在具备和不具备血运重建服务的医院中分别为HR,0.68;95%CI,0.65 - 0.70;P<0.001)。入院后前30天黑人患者的风险调整死亡率较低(HR,0.91;95%CI,0.88 - 0.93;P<0.001;在具备和不具备血运重建服务的医院中分别为HR,0.90;95%CI,0.87 - 0.92;P<0.001),但此后则较高(P<0.001)。
入住具备或不具备冠状动脉血运重建服务医院的黑人患者接受冠状动脉血运重建的可能性较小。黑人患者较高的长期死亡率可能反映出血运重建使用率较低或AMI治疗的其他方面。