Sugarman Alan
4180 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 550B, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Int J Psychoanal. 2009 Dec;90(6):1255-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00212.x.
Child analysis continues to be seen as a different technique from adult analysis because children are still involved in a developmental process and because the primary objects continue to play active roles in their lives. This paper argues that this is a false dichotomy. An extended vignette of the analysis of a latency-aged girl is used to demonstrate that the psychoanalytic process that develops in child analysis is structurally the same as that in adult analysis. Both revolve around the analysis of resistance and transference and use both to promote knowledge of the patient's mind at work. And both techniques formulate interventions based on the analyst's appraisal of the patient's mental organization. It is hoped that stressing the essential commonality of both techniques will promote the development of an overarching theory of psychoanalytic technique.
儿童分析仍然被视为一种与成人分析不同的技术，这是因为儿童仍处于发展过程中，且主要客体在他们的生活中继续发挥着积极作用。本文认为这是一种错误的二分法。通过一个对潜伏期女童分析的扩展案例，来证明儿童分析中发展起来的精神分析过程在结构上与成人分析中的相同。两者都围绕着对阻抗和移情的分析展开，并利用它们来增进对患者工作状态下心理的了解。而且这两种技术都基于分析师对患者心理结构的评估来制定干预措施。希望强调这两种技术的本质共性将促进精神分析技术总体理论的发展。
