Department of Radiology, Charité-University Hospital, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2010 Apr;61(2):102-8. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
We sought to compare the performance of 3 computer-aided detection (CAD) polyp algorithms in computed tomography colonography (CTC) with fecal tagging.
CTC data sets of 33 patients were retrospectively analysed by 3 different CAD systems: system 1, MedicSight; system 2, Colon CAD; and system 3, Polyp Enhanced View. The polyp database comprised 53 lesions, including 6 cases of colorectal cancer, and was established by consensus reading and comparison with colonoscopy. Lesions ranged from 6-40 mm, with 25 lesions larger than 10 mm in size. Detection and false-positive (FP) rates were calculated.
CAD systems 1 and 2 could be set to have varying sensitivities with higher FP rates for higher sensitivity levels. Sensitivities for system 1 ranged from 73%-94% for all lesions (78%-100% for lesions > or =10 mm) and, for system 2, from 64%-94% (78%-100% for lesions > or =10 mm). System 3 reached an overall sensitivity of 76% (100% for lesions > or =10 mm). The mean FP rate per patient ranged from 8-32 for system 1, from 1-8 for system 2, and was 5 for system 3. At the highest sensitivity level for all polyps (94%), system 2 showed a statistically significant lower FP rate compared with system 1 (P = .001). When analysing lesions > or =10 mm, system 3 had significantly fewer FPs than systems 1 and 2 (P < .012).
Standalone CTC-CAD analysis in the selected patient collective showed the 3 systems tested to have a variable but overall promising performance with respect to sensitivity and the FP rate.
我们旨在比较 3 种计算机辅助检测(CAD)息肉算法在带粪便标记的计算机断层结肠成像(CTC)中的性能。
对 33 例患者的 CTC 数据集进行回顾性分析,使用 3 种不同的 CAD 系统:系统 1,MedicSight;系统 2,结肠 CAD;系统 3,息肉增强视图。息肉数据库包括 53 个病变,其中包括 6 例结直肠癌病例,通过共识阅读并与结肠镜检查比较建立。病变大小为 6-40mm,25 个病变大于 10mm。计算检测和假阳性(FP)率。
CAD 系统 1 和 2 可以设置不同的灵敏度,较高的 FP 率对应较高的灵敏度水平。系统 1 的灵敏度为所有病变的 73%-94%(病变 > =10mm 的灵敏度为 78%-100%),系统 2 的灵敏度为 64%-94%(病变 > =10mm 的灵敏度为 78%-100%)。系统 3 的总灵敏度为 76%(病变 > =10mm 的灵敏度为 100%)。每个患者的平均 FP 率范围为系统 1 的 8-32,系统 2 的 1-8,系统 3 的 5。在所有息肉的最高灵敏度水平(94%)下,系统 2 的 FP 率与系统 1 相比具有统计学显著差异(P=0.001)。分析病变 > =10mm 时,系统 3 的 FP 明显少于系统 1 和 2(P <0.012)。
在选定的患者群体中,独立的 CTC-CAD 分析显示,所测试的 3 种系统在灵敏度和 FP 率方面具有不同但总体有前景的性能。