Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary Institute, NSW, 2042 Australia.
Hum Pathol. 2010 Mar;41(3):392-400. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.08.020. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
Dead in bed syndrome is a poorly understood cause of sudden death in young people with type 1 diabetes. The underlying cause remains unknown. One possible explanation may involve prolongation of the QT interval followed by a terminal malignant arrhythmia. Risk factors associated with QT interval prolongation include hypoglycemia and cardiac autonomic neuropathy. We sought to identify myocardial cellular changes and genetic influences that may contribute to the pathogenesis of dead in bed syndrome. Post-mortem reports between 1994 and 2006 from the 2 largest Departments of Forensic Medicine in Australia were reviewed for dead in bed syndrome cases. Post-mortem heart sections were immunohistochemically stained for collagen types I and III and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF). Genomic DNA was prepared from post-mortem samples, and genetic analysis was performed in the SCN5A, G6PC, PHOX2B, and CTGF genes. Twenty-two dead in bed syndrome cases were identified and staining of heart sections for collagen I and III, and CTGF showed no differences between dead in bed syndrome cases and controls. Genetic screening of SCN5A revealed 3 silent polymorphisms A29A, E1061E, and D1819D and 1 protein-changing variant H558R. No genetic variants were found in G6PC, PHOX2B, and CTGF, and dead in bed syndrome cases were not associated with the G-945C CTGF promoter polymorphism. In conclusion, this study is the first to investigate potential pathogenic mechanisms underlying the dead in bed syndrome in type 1 diabetes with the results substantially adding to knowledge of this condition. Understanding the causes and triggers of dead in bed syndrome will be critical in facilitating the identification of patients with type 1 diabetes at highest risk of developing sudden death.
猝死综合征是 1 型糖尿病患者中一种原因不明的青年人猝死的罕见病因。其潜在病因仍然未知。一种可能的解释可能涉及 QT 间期延长,随后出现终末恶性心律失常。与 QT 间期延长相关的危险因素包括低血糖和心脏自主神经病变。我们试图确定可能导致猝死综合征发病机制的心肌细胞变化和遗传影响。我们回顾了 1994 年至 2006 年间澳大利亚最大的两个法医部门的猝死综合征病例的尸检报告。对死后心脏切片进行 I 型和 III 型胶原及结缔组织生长因子(CTGF)的免疫组织化学染色。从死后样本中提取基因组 DNA,并在 SCN5A、G6PC、PHOX2B 和 CTGF 基因中进行遗传分析。确定了 22 例猝死综合征病例,对心脏切片进行胶原 I 和 III 及 CTGF 染色显示,猝死综合征病例与对照组之间无差异。SCN5A 的遗传筛查显示 3 个沉默多态性 A29A、E1061E 和 D1819D 以及 1 个蛋白改变变体 H558R。在 G6PC、PHOX2B 和 CTGF 中未发现遗传变异,猝死综合征病例与 CTGF 的 G-945C 启动子多态性无关。总之,这项研究首次调查了 1 型糖尿病猝死综合征的潜在发病机制,结果大大增加了对该疾病的认识。了解猝死综合征的原因和触发因素对于确定 1 型糖尿病患者中发生突然死亡风险最高的患者至关重要。