Measuring the best outcome for the least intervention: can the Optimality Index-US be applied in the UK?

OBJECTIVE

to pilot the Optimality Index-US (OI-US) for the first time within a UK maternity setting in a sample of women at mixed risk.

DESIGN

a multidisciplinary group reviewed the items and evidence base of the OI-US. A pilot study was undertaken to compare the availability and quality of data from maternity records to complete the OI-US. Data were collected from maternity records.

SETTING

a maternity unit of an inner city teaching hospital in England.

PARTICIPANTS

clinical midwives, research midwives, midwifery lecturers and consultant obstetricians (n=10) reviewed the items and evidence base of the OI-US. Data were collected from the maternity records of 97 women receiving caseload care and 103 women receiving standard care.

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

when the multidisciplinary group reviewed the items and evidence base of the OI-US, it was noted that some social and clinical factors should be considered for inclusion as part of the Perinatal Background Index (PBI) and OI. The results suggest that the inclusion of women at higher risk in this sample within the UK maternity setting has not been captured by the OI-US.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

the following social and clinical factors should be included as part of the PBI and OI for the UK setting: measure of social deprivation, woman's ability to speak and understand English in relation to accessing maternity care, mental health problems during pregnancy and history of domestic violence during pregnancy

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

availability of items in electronic records is poor and it is recommended that the OI-UK version is a useful research tool in prospective data collection. The development of an international version would be valuable for comparison of background risk and outcomes across a range of care settings.