Hermus Marieke A A, Hitzert Marit, Boesveld Inge C, van den Akker-van Marle M Elske, Dommelen Paula van, Franx Arie, Graaf Johanna P de, Lith Jan M M van, Luurssen-Masurel Nathalie, Steegers Eric A P, Wiegers Therese A, Bruin Karin M van der Pal-de
Department of Child Health, TNO (Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Obstetrics, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 16;7(11):e016958. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016958.
To compare the Optimality Index of planned birth in a birth centre with planned birth in a hospital and planned home birth for low-risk term pregnant women who start labour under the responsibility of a community midwife.
Prospective cohort study.
Low-risk pregnant women under care of a community midwife and living in a region with one of the 21 participating Dutch birth centres or in a region with the possibility for midwife-led hospital birth. Home birth was commonly available in all regions included in the study.
3455 low-risk term pregnant women (1686 nulliparous and 1769 multiparous) who gave birth between 1 July 2013 and 31 December 2013: 1668 planned birth centre births, 701 planned midwife-led hospital births and 1086 planned home births.
The Optimality IndexNL-2015, a tool to measure 'maximum outcome with minimal intervention', was assessed by planned place of birth being a birth centre, a hospital setting or at home. Also, a composite maternal and perinatal adverse outcome score was calculated for the different planned places of birth.
There were no differences in Optimality Index NL-2015 for pregnant women who planned to give birth in a birth centre compared with women who planned to give birth in a hospital. Although effect sizes were small, women who planned to give birth at home had a higher Optimality Index NL-2015 than women who planned to give birth in a birth centre. The differences were larger for multiparous than for nulliparous women.
The Optimality Index NL-2015 for women with planned birth centre births was comparable with planned midwife-led hospital births. Women with planned home births had a higher Optimality Index NL-2015, that is, a higher sum score of evidence-based items with an optimal value than women with planned birth centre births.
比较在分娩中心计划分娩、在医院计划分娩以及在社区助产士负责下开始分娩的低风险足月孕妇计划在家分娩的优化指数。
前瞻性队列研究。
由社区助产士护理的低风险孕妇,居住在荷兰21家参与研究的分娩中心之一所在地区,或有由助产士主导的医院分娩可能性的地区。研究纳入的所有地区均可进行家庭分娩。
2013年7月1日至2013年12月31日期间分娩的3455名低风险足月孕妇(1686名单胎初产妇和1769名经产妇):1668例计划在分娩中心分娩,701例计划由助产士主导在医院分娩,1086例计划在家分娩。
通过计划分娩地点是分娩中心、医院环境还是在家中,评估优化指数NL - 2015,这是一种衡量“以最小干预实现最大结果”的工具。此外,还计算了不同计划分娩地点的孕产妇和围产期不良结局综合评分。
计划在分娩中心分娩的孕妇与计划在医院分娩的孕妇在优化指数NL - 2015方面没有差异。尽管效应量较小,但计划在家分娩的女性比计划在分娩中心分娩的女性具有更高的优化指数NL - 2015。经产妇的差异比初产妇更大。
计划在分娩中心分娩的女性的优化指数NL - 2015与计划由助产士主导在医院分娩相当。计划在家分娩的女性比计划在分娩中心分娩的女性具有更高的优化指数NL - 2015,即基于证据的项目总和得分更高且具有最佳值。