• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建筑废弃物的环境绩效:来自西班牙加泰罗尼亚案例研究的三个情景比较。

Environmental performance of construction waste: Comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain.

机构信息

Rovira i Virgili University, Environmental Analysis and Management Group (AGA), Chemical Engineering Department, Av. Països Catalans 26, 43007, Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2010 Apr;30(4):646-54. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.013. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.013
PMID:20005694
Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to evaluate environmental impacts of construction wastes in terms of the LIFE 98 ENV/E/351 project. Construction wastes are classified in accordance with the Life Program Environment Directive of the European Commission. Three different scenarios to current waste management from a case study in Catalonia (Spain) have been compared: landfilling, recycling and incineration, and these scenarios were evaluated by means of Life Cycle Assessment. The recommendations of the Catalan Waste Catalogue and the European Waste Catalogue have been taken into account. Also, the influence of transport has been evaluated. Results show that in terms of the Global Warming Potential, the most environmentally friendly treatment was recycling, followed by incineration and lastly landfilling. According to the influence of treatment plants location on the GWP indicator, we observe that incineration and recycling of construction wastes are better than landfilling, even for long distances from the building site to the plants. This is true for most wastes except for the stony types, than should be recycled close to the building site. In summary, data from construction waste of a Catalan case study was evaluated using the well established method of LCA to determine the environmental impacts.

摘要

本文的主要目的是根据 LIFE 98 ENV/E/351 项目评估建筑废物的环境影响。建筑废物是按照欧盟委员会的环境指令(Life Program Environment Directive)进行分类的。本文比较了西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区(Catalonia)当前三种不同的废物管理方案:填埋、回收和焚烧,并通过生命周期评估(Life Cycle Assessment)对这些方案进行了评估。本文还考虑了加泰罗尼亚废物目录(Catalan Waste Catalogue)和欧洲废物目录(European Waste Catalogue)的建议。此外,本文还评估了运输的影响。结果表明,就全球变暖潜势(Global Warming Potential)而言,最环保的处理方法是回收,其次是焚烧,最后是填埋。根据处理厂位置对 GWP 指标的影响,我们观察到,即使距离建筑工地较远,焚烧和回收建筑废物也比填埋好。除了石质废物外,这种情况适用于大多数废物,而石质废物应在靠近建筑工地的地方进行回收。总之,本文使用成熟的生命周期评估方法(LCA)对来自加泰罗尼亚案例研究的建筑废物数据进行了评估,以确定其环境影响。

相似文献

1
Environmental performance of construction waste: Comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain.建筑废弃物的环境绩效:来自西班牙加泰罗尼亚案例研究的三个情景比较。
Waste Manag. 2010 Apr;30(4):646-54. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.013. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
2
Life cycle assessment of disposal of residues from municipal solid waste incineration: recycling of bottom ash in road construction or landfilling in Denmark evaluated in the ROAD-RES model.城市固体废弃物焚烧残渣处置的生命周期评估:在丹麦,利用ROAD-RES模型评估道路建设中底灰的回收利用或填埋情况。
Waste Manag. 2007;27(8):S75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.016. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
3
Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature.城市固体废物管理系统的生命周期评估:对部分同行评审文献的比较分析
Environ Int. 2009 Nov;35(8):1256-66. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.07.009. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
4
Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete.天然骨料混凝土与再生骨料混凝土的环境比较评估。
Waste Manag. 2010 Nov;30(11):2255-64. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.04.012.
5
Environmental assessment of garden waste management in the Municipality of Aarhus, Denmark.丹麦奥胡斯市园林废弃物管理的环境评估。
Waste Manag. 2011 Jul;31(7):1560-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
6
Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis.运用多准则决策分析选择可持续的拆除废物管理策略。
Waste Manag. 2009 Jan;29(1):12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.010. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
7
Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey.土耳其埃斯基谢希尔固体废物管理方案的生命周期评估
Waste Manag. 2009 Jan;29(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
8
Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management methods: Ankara case study.城市固体废物管理方法的生命周期评估:安卡拉案例研究
Environ Int. 2006 Apr;32(3):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2005.10.002. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
9
Evaluation of environmental burdens caused by changes of food waste management systems in Seoul, Korea.韩国首尔食物垃圾管理系统变化所造成的环境负担评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2007 Nov 15;387(1-3):42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.037. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
10
Waste collection systems for recyclables: an environmental and economic assessment for the municipality of Aarhus (Denmark).可回收物的废物收集系统:奥胡斯市(丹麦)的环境和经济评估。
Waste Manag. 2010 May;30(5):744-54. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.10.021. Epub 2009 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the strength prediction equation and model of cement stabilized macadam mixed with recycled construction waste aggregate.再生建筑垃圾集料水泥稳定碎石强度预测方程及模型研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):9701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94615-9.
2
Improving the decision-making for sustainable demolition waste management by combining a BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment framework and hybrid MCDA approach.通过结合基于BIM的生命周期可持续性评估框架和混合多准则决策分析方法,改善可持续拆除废物管理的决策制定。
Waste Manag Res. 2025 Jul;43(7):1086-1098. doi: 10.1177/0734242X241291941. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
3
Identifying and prioritizing sustainability indicators for China's assessing demolition waste management using modified Delphi-analytic hierarchy process method.
采用改进 Delphi-层次分析法对中国评估拆除废物管理的可持续性指标进行识别和优先级排序。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Nov;41(11):1649-1660. doi: 10.1177/0734242X231166309. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
4
Reverse logistics planning research of building waste from perspective of closed supply chain in urban sustainable environment governance.城市可持续环境治理视角下闭环供应链的建筑废弃物逆向物流规划研究。
Sci Prog. 2023 Jan-Mar;106(1):368504231150427. doi: 10.1177/00368504231150427.
5
Incentive Mechanism and Subsidy Design for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling under Information Asymmetry with Reciprocal Behaviors.信息不对称下互惠行为的建筑和拆除废物回收激励机制与补贴设计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 17;17(12):4346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124346.
6
Life cycle modeling for environmental management: a review of trends and linkages.生命周期建模在环境管理中的应用:趋势与关联综述。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Dec 17;192(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-8026-7.
7
Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review.建筑和拆除废物的管理领域:科学计量学综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 24;15(11):2350. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112350.
8
Technical, hygiene, economic, and life cycle assessment of full-scale moving bed biofilm reactors for wastewater treatment in India.印度用于废水处理的全规模移动床生物膜反应器的技术、卫生、经济和生命周期评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jan;25(3):2552-2569. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0605-y. Epub 2017 Nov 10.