Suppr超能文献

建筑废弃物的环境绩效:来自西班牙加泰罗尼亚案例研究的三个情景比较。

Environmental performance of construction waste: Comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain.

机构信息

Rovira i Virgili University, Environmental Analysis and Management Group (AGA), Chemical Engineering Department, Av. Països Catalans 26, 43007, Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2010 Apr;30(4):646-54. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.013. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to evaluate environmental impacts of construction wastes in terms of the LIFE 98 ENV/E/351 project. Construction wastes are classified in accordance with the Life Program Environment Directive of the European Commission. Three different scenarios to current waste management from a case study in Catalonia (Spain) have been compared: landfilling, recycling and incineration, and these scenarios were evaluated by means of Life Cycle Assessment. The recommendations of the Catalan Waste Catalogue and the European Waste Catalogue have been taken into account. Also, the influence of transport has been evaluated. Results show that in terms of the Global Warming Potential, the most environmentally friendly treatment was recycling, followed by incineration and lastly landfilling. According to the influence of treatment plants location on the GWP indicator, we observe that incineration and recycling of construction wastes are better than landfilling, even for long distances from the building site to the plants. This is true for most wastes except for the stony types, than should be recycled close to the building site. In summary, data from construction waste of a Catalan case study was evaluated using the well established method of LCA to determine the environmental impacts.

摘要

本文的主要目的是根据 LIFE 98 ENV/E/351 项目评估建筑废物的环境影响。建筑废物是按照欧盟委员会的环境指令(Life Program Environment Directive)进行分类的。本文比较了西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区(Catalonia)当前三种不同的废物管理方案:填埋、回收和焚烧,并通过生命周期评估(Life Cycle Assessment)对这些方案进行了评估。本文还考虑了加泰罗尼亚废物目录(Catalan Waste Catalogue)和欧洲废物目录(European Waste Catalogue)的建议。此外,本文还评估了运输的影响。结果表明,就全球变暖潜势(Global Warming Potential)而言,最环保的处理方法是回收,其次是焚烧,最后是填埋。根据处理厂位置对 GWP 指标的影响,我们观察到,即使距离建筑工地较远,焚烧和回收建筑废物也比填埋好。除了石质废物外,这种情况适用于大多数废物,而石质废物应在靠近建筑工地的地方进行回收。总之,本文使用成熟的生命周期评估方法(LCA)对来自加泰罗尼亚案例研究的建筑废物数据进行了评估,以确定其环境影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验