Suppr超能文献

[治疗急性踝关节扭伤时弹力袜与弹力绷带的对比:一项前瞻性随机研究]

[Compression stockings contra ace-bandages in the treatment of acute ankle distorsions. A prospective randomized study].

作者信息

Hølmer P, Carstensen N C, Merrild U B

机构信息

Københavns Amts Sygehus i Gentofte, ortopaedkirurgisk afdeling.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1991 Feb 4;153(6):430-2.

PMID:2000648
Abstract

Sprained ankles are most often treated with ace-bandages. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of compressing antiembolism stocking (T.E.D.) versus the ace-bandage in a prospective randomised trial. Evaluation was based on the duration of pain, swelling, limp and absence from daily routines (job, daily activity and sport). The study included 149 patients. We found no difference between the two treatments, on the basis of 95% confidence interval at the difference between the treatments. On the basis of this trial we cannot recommend one treatment rather than the other, but it must be borne in mind that the ace-bandage is cheaper.

摘要

脚踝扭伤通常最常用弹力绷带治疗。本研究的目的是在前瞻性随机试验中,调查使用抗栓袜(T.E.D.)与弹力绷带相比的治疗效果。评估基于疼痛、肿胀、跛行的持续时间以及日常活动(工作、日常活动和运动)的缺勤情况。该研究纳入了149名患者。基于两种治疗方法之间差异的95%置信区间,我们发现两种治疗方法之间没有差异。基于这项试验,我们无法推荐使用其中一种治疗方法而非另一种,但必须记住,弹力绷带更便宜。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验