• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

班级共享对双胞胎教育成就没有影响:一项前瞻性、纵向队列研究。

No effect of classroom sharing on educational achievement in twins: a prospective, longitudinal cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Biological Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Jan;64(1):36-40. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.091629.

DOI:10.1136/jech.2009.091629
PMID:20007633
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A returning dilemma for families with multiple births is whether twins should share the same, or a parallel classroom, or in other words, whether they should be separated at school or not. This study investigated the effects of sharing a classroom during primary school on cognitive achievement in twins.

METHOD

Subjects were 839 monozygotic and 1164 dizygotic twin pairs who were registered at birth at The Netherlands Twin Register. A prospective, longitudinal study design was used with educational achievement at age 12 years, measured with a standardised test (CITO test), as outcome measure.

RESULTS

Most twin pairs (72%) shared a classroom during their schooling, 19% were in separate, but parallel, classes, and 9% "partly" shared a classroom. Twins who were in parallel classrooms had higher CITO scores (mean 539.51; SD 8.12), compared to twins who shared a classroom (537.99; SD 8.52). When controlling for socioeconomic status, and externalising problems before starting primary school (age 3), there was no significant difference in educational achievement between separated and non-separated twin pairs (p = 0.138). In addition, there was no interaction with sex or zygosity of the twins (p = 0.798).

CONCLUSION

There is no difference in educational achievement between twins who share a classroom and twins who do not share a classroom during their primary school time. The choice of separation should be made by teachers, parents and their twin children, based on individual characteristics of a twin pair.

摘要

背景

多胞胎家庭面临的一个反复出现的困境是,双胞胎是否应该在同一个班级,或者换句话说,他们是否应该在学校分开。本研究调查了小学期间共享教室对双胞胎认知成绩的影响。

方法

研究对象为在荷兰双胞胎登记处出生时登记的 839 对同卵双胞胎和 1164 对异卵双胞胎。采用前瞻性、纵向研究设计,以 12 岁时的教育成就(用标准化测试(CITO 测试)衡量)为结果指标。

结果

大多数双胞胎(72%)在上学期间共享一个教室,19%的双胞胎在分开但平行的班级中,9%的双胞胎“部分”共享一个教室。在平行教室里的双胞胎的 CITO 得分较高(平均 539.51;SD8.12),而共享教室的双胞胎的 CITO 得分较低(537.99;SD8.52)。在控制社会经济地位和入学前(3 岁)的外化问题后,分开和不分开的双胞胎之间的教育成就没有显著差异(p=0.138)。此外,双胞胎的性别或同卵性与这一结果没有交互作用(p=0.798)。

结论

在小学期间共享教室和不共享教室的双胞胎之间,教育成就没有差异。分离的选择应该由教师、家长和他们的双胞胎孩子根据双胞胎的个体特征来做出。

相似文献

1
No effect of classroom sharing on educational achievement in twins: a prospective, longitudinal cohort study.班级共享对双胞胎教育成就没有影响:一项前瞻性、纵向队列研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Jan;64(1):36-40. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.091629.
2
Does sharing the same class in school improve cognitive abilities of twins?在学校同班上课能提高双胞胎的认知能力吗?
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007 Aug;10(4):573-80. doi: 10.1375/twin.10.4.573.
3
Twin classroom dilemma: To study together or separately?双胞胎教室困境:一起学习还是分开学习?
Dev Psychol. 2018 Jul;54(7):1244-1254. doi: 10.1037/dev0000519. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
4
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
5
Nature, nurture and academic achievement: a twin study of teacher assessments of 7-year-olds.天性、教养与学业成就:一项针对7岁儿童教师评估的双胞胎研究
Br J Educ Psychol. 2004 Sep;74(Pt 3):323-42. doi: 10.1348/0007099041552387.
6
Breast cancer risk in monozygotic and dizygotic female twins: a 20-year population-based cohort study in Finland from 1976 to 1995.单卵和双卵双胞胎女性患乳腺癌的风险:一项基于芬兰1976年至1995年20年人群的队列研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Mar;8(3):271-4.
7
School achievement and test results for twins and singletons in relation to social background.双胞胎和单胎的学业成绩及考试结果与社会背景的关系。
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1978;24A:101-9.
8
Experiences of violence and deficits in academic achievement among urban primary school children in Jamaica.牙买加城市小学儿童的暴力经历与学业成绩缺陷
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 May;33(5):296-306. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.05.011. Epub 2009 May 29.
9
Lifestyle factors in monozygotic and dizygotic twins.同卵双胞胎和异卵双胞胎中的生活方式因素。
Genet Epidemiol. 1988;5(5):311-21. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370050503.
10
Effects of social policy on the heritability of educational achievement.社会政策对教育成就遗传力的影响。
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985;177:489-507.

引用本文的文献

1
Classroom Placement and Twins' Social Behaviors in Elementary School: Providing Empirical Evidence to Inform Educational Policy.小学课堂安置与双胞胎的社会行为:为教育政策提供实证依据
Educ Policy (Los Altos Calif). 2022 Nov;36(7):1850-1875. doi: 10.1177/08959048211015626. Epub 2021 May 27.
2
The genetic and environmental effects on school grades in late childhood and adolescence.儿童晚期和青少年时期的学校成绩受遗传和环境因素的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 31;14(12):e0225946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225946. eCollection 2019.
3
The impact of chronic fatigue syndrome on cognitive functioning in adolescents.
慢性疲劳综合征对青少年认知功能的影响。
Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Feb;175(2):245-52. doi: 10.1007/s00431-015-2626-1. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
4
A genetic study on attention problems and academic skills: results of a longitudinal study in twins.一项关于注意力问题与学术技能的遗传学研究:双胞胎纵向研究结果
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;20(1):22-34.