Heller R F, O'Connell D L, Roberts D C, Allen J R, Knapp J C, Steele P L, Silove D
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Newcastle, N.S.W., Australia.
Genet Epidemiol. 1988;5(5):311-21. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370050503.
In examining genetic influences on biological variables using twins, it may be important to examine the distribution between and within twin pairs of demographic and lifestyle factors that may themselves affect the biological variable being studied. We explored the distribution of demographic and lifestyle factors that may affect blood lipid levels or ischaemic heart disease (IHD) risk among a sample of 106 monozygotic (MZ) and 94 like-sex dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs. In our sample, MZ twins were statistically significantly different from DZ twins only in marital status, cigarette smoking habits, and the ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fat (P:S ratio) in their dietary intake. The latter variable was among many dietary variables examined (using 4-day weighed food diaries), and the size of the difference in intake was small. When comparisons were made of the similarities within twin pairs, we found members of MZ twin pairs to be statistically significantly closer than DZ twins in educational achievement, occupation, cigarette smoking, and exercise habits, and the number of days a week on which alcohol was consumed. These last three variables were consistently closer among twins with closer contact than among those with a smaller degree of current shared environment. For 12 of the 13 nutrients examined, the within-pair correlations were higher for MZ than for DZ twins, although our test for significant genetic variance showed statistical significance only for intake of complex carbohydrates. We conclude that MZ twins share demographic and lifestyle factors that might influence the risk of IHD and blood lipid levels to a greater degree than do DZ twins, although it is difficult to say if these similarities in lifestyle result from genetic influences or not. Nevertheless, ascribing differences between correlations in MZ and DZ twin pairs for lipid levels as being purely "genetic"--as implicit in conventional measures of heritability--is likely to overestimate the influence of genetic factors.
在利用双胞胎研究基因对生物变量的影响时,考察双胞胎对之间以及双胞胎个体内部可能影响所研究生物变量的人口统计学和生活方式因素的分布情况或许很重要。我们在106对同卵双胞胎(MZ)和94对同性异卵双胞胎(DZ)中,探究了可能影响血脂水平或缺血性心脏病(IHD)风险的人口统计学和生活方式因素的分布。在我们的样本中,MZ双胞胎与DZ双胞胎仅在婚姻状况、吸烟习惯以及饮食摄入中多不饱和脂肪与饱和脂肪的比例(P:S比例)上存在统计学显著差异。后一个变量是众多被考察的饮食变量之一(使用4天的称重食物日记),摄入差异的幅度较小。当对双胞胎对内部的相似性进行比较时,我们发现MZ双胞胎对的成员在教育成就、职业、吸烟和运动习惯以及每周饮酒天数方面,在统计学上比DZ双胞胎更为接近。在接触更密切的双胞胎中,这最后三个变量始终比当前共享环境程度较低的双胞胎更为接近。在所考察的13种营养素中的12种,MZ双胞胎对内部的相关性高于DZ双胞胎,尽管我们对显著基因变异的检验仅显示复合碳水化合物摄入具有统计学显著性。我们得出结论,MZ双胞胎比DZ双胞胎在更大程度上共享可能影响IHD风险和血脂水平的人口统计学和生活方式因素,尽管很难说这些生活方式上的相似性是否源于基因影响。然而,将MZ和DZ双胞胎对血脂水平相关性的差异纯粹归因于“基因”——如同传统遗传度测量中所隐含的那样——很可能高估了基因因素的影响。