Suppr超能文献

甲型 H5N1 流感大流行中扩大抗病毒预防和佐剂疫苗接种策略的效果和成本效益。

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of expanded antiviral prophylaxis and adjuvanted vaccination strategies for an influenza A (H5N1) pandemic.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, H3143, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 15;151(12):840-53. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00156.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The pandemic potential of influenza A (H5N1) virus is a prominent public health concern of the 21st century.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alternative pandemic (H5N1) mitigation and response strategies.

DESIGN

Compartmental epidemic model in conjunction with a Markov model of disease progression.

DATA SOURCES

Literature and expert opinion.

TARGET POPULATION

Residents of a U.S. metropolitan city with a population of 8.3 million.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Societal.

INTERVENTIONS

3 scenarios: 1) vaccination and antiviral pharmacotherapy in quantities similar to those currently available in the U.S. stockpile (stockpiled strategy), 2) stockpiled strategy but with expanded distribution of antiviral agents (expanded prophylaxis strategy), and 3) stockpiled strategy but with adjuvanted vaccine (expanded vaccination strategy). All scenarios assumed standard nonpharmaceutical interventions.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Infections and deaths averted, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Expanded vaccination was the most effective and cost-effective of the 3 strategies, averting 68% of infections and deaths and gaining 404 030 QALYs at $10 844 per QALY gained relative to the stockpiled strategy.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Expanded vaccination remained incrementally cost-effective over a wide range of assumptions.

LIMITATIONS

The model assumed homogenous mixing of cases and contacts; heterogeneous mixing would result in faster initial spread, followed by slower spread. We did not model interventions for children or older adults; the model is not designed to target interventions to specific groups.

CONCLUSION

Expanded adjuvanted vaccination is an effective and cost-effective mitigation strategy for an influenza A (H5N1) pandemic. Expanded antiviral prophylaxis can help delay the pandemic while additional strategies are implemented.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

摘要

背景

甲型流感(H5N1)病毒的大流行潜力是 21 世纪公共卫生的主要关注点。

目的

评估替代大流行(H5N1)缓解和应对策略的有效性和成本效益。

设计

结合疾病进展的马尔可夫模型的隔室流行模型。

数据来源

文献和专家意见。

目标人群

人口为 830 万的美国大都市居民。

时间范围

终身。

观点

社会。

干预措施

3 种情景:1)类似于美国库存中目前可用的疫苗接种和抗病毒药物治疗(库存策略),2)库存策略,但扩大抗病毒药物的分发(扩大预防策略),3)库存策略,但使用佐剂疫苗(扩大疫苗接种策略)。所有情景均假设采用标准的非药物干预措施。

结果测量

预防感染和死亡、成本、质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益。

基础分析结果

与库存策略相比,扩大疫苗接种是 3 种策略中最有效和最具成本效益的策略,可预防 68%的感染和死亡,并获得 404030 个 QALY,每获得一个 QALY 的成本为 10844 美元。

敏感性分析结果

在广泛的假设条件下,扩大疫苗接种仍然具有增量成本效益。

局限性

该模型假设病例和接触者的混合是同质的;异质混合将导致初始传播更快,随后传播速度更慢。我们没有为儿童或老年人建模干预措施;该模型不是为针对特定群体的干预措施而设计的。

结论

扩大佐剂疫苗接种是应对甲型流感(H5N1)大流行的有效和具有成本效益的缓解策略。扩大抗病毒预防可以帮助延缓大流行,同时实施其他策略。

主要资金来源

美国国立卫生研究院和医疗保健研究与质量局。

相似文献

8
The modern crystal ball: influenza forecasting with mathematical models.现代水晶球:用数学模型预测流感
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 15;151(12):886-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00154.

引用本文的文献

5

本文引用的文献

6
Global transmission of oseltamivir-resistant influenza.耐奥司他韦流感病毒的全球传播。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):953-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0900648. Epub 2009 Mar 2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验