Cowling Benjamin J, Chan Kwok-Hung, Fang Vicky J, Cheng Calvin K Y, Fung Rita O P, Wai Winnie, Sin Joey, Seto Wing Hong, Yung Raymond, Chu Daniel W S, Chiu Billy C F, Lee Paco W Y, Chiu Ming Chi, Lee Hoi Che, Uyeki Timothy M, Houck Peter M, Peiris J S Malik, Leung Gabriel M
School of Public Health and University of Hong Kong, Cyberport 3, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Oct 6;151(7):437-46. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-7-200910060-00142. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
Few data are available about the effectiveness of nonpharmaceutical interventions for preventing influenza virus transmission.
To investigate whether hand hygiene and use of facemasks prevents household transmission of influenza.
Cluster randomized, controlled trial. Randomization was computer generated; allocation was concealed from treating physicians and clinics and implemented by study nurses at the time of the initial household visit. Participants and personnel administering the interventions were not blinded to group assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00425893)
Households in Hong Kong.
407 people presenting to outpatient clinics with influenza-like illness who were positive for influenza A or B virus by rapid testing (index patients) and 794 household members (contacts) in 259 households.
Lifestyle education (control) (134 households), hand hygiene (136 households), or surgical facemasks plus hand hygiene (137 households) for all household members.
Influenza virus infection in contacts, as confirmed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or diagnosed clinically after 7 days.
Sixty (8%) contacts in the 259 households had RT-PCR-confirmed influenza virus infection in the 7 days after intervention. Hand hygiene with or without facemasks seemed to reduce influenza transmission, but the differences compared with the control group were not significant. In 154 households in which interventions were implemented within 36 hours of symptom onset in the index patient, transmission of RT-PCR-confirmed infection seemed reduced, an effect attributable to fewer infections among participants using facemasks plus hand hygiene (adjusted odds ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.87]). Adherence to interventions varied.
The delay from index patient symptom onset to intervention and variable adherence may have mitigated intervention effectiveness.
Hand hygiene and facemasks seemed to prevent household transmission of influenza virus when implemented within 36 hours of index patient symptom onset. These findings suggest that nonpharmaceutical interventions are important for mitigation of pandemic and interpandemic influenza.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
关于非药物干预措施预防流感病毒传播有效性的数据很少。
调查手部卫生和使用口罩是否能预防家庭内流感传播。
整群随机对照试验。随机分组由计算机生成;治疗医生和诊所不知道分组情况,由研究护士在首次家庭访视时实施分组。干预措施的实施者和参与者知道分组情况。(临床试验.gov注册号:NCT00425893)
中国香港的家庭。
407名因流感样疾病到门诊就诊、经快速检测确诊为甲型或乙型流感病毒阳性的患者(索引患者),以及来自259个家庭的794名家庭成员(接触者)。
对所有家庭成员进行生活方式教育(对照组,134个家庭)、手部卫生干预(136个家庭)或佩戴外科口罩并进行手部卫生干预(137个家庭)。
通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)确诊或在7天后临床诊断的接触者中的流感病毒感染情况。
在259个家庭中,60名(8%)接触者在干预后7天内RT-PCR确诊感染流感病毒。单独或联合使用口罩的手部卫生干预似乎能减少流感传播,但与对照组相比差异不显著。在154个索引患者症状出现后36小时内实施干预措施的家庭中,RT-PCR确诊感染的传播似乎减少了,这一效果归因于佩戴口罩并进行手部卫生干预的参与者中感染较少(调整后的优势比为0.33[95%可信区间为0.13至0.87])。干预措施的依从性各不相同。
从索引患者症状出现到实施干预的延迟以及不同的依从性可能削弱了干预效果。
在索引患者症状出现后36小时内实施手部卫生和佩戴口罩措施似乎能预防家庭内流感病毒传播。这些发现表明,非药物干预措施对于减轻大流行和大流行间期流感的影响很重要。
疾病控制与预防中心。