Children's Hospital Informatics Program at the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):526-31. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1506. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
OBJECTIVE To assess the ability to identify potential association(s) of diabetes medications with myocardial infarction using usual care clinical data obtained from the electronic medical record. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We defined a retrospective cohort of patients (n = 34,253) treated with a sulfonylurea, metformin, rosiglitazone, or pioglitazone in a single academic health care network. All patients were aged >18 years with at least one prescription for one of the medications between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2006. The study outcome was acute myocardial infarction requiring hospitalization. We used a cumulative temporal approach to ascertain the calendar date for earliest identifiable risk associated with rosiglitazone compared with that for other therapies. RESULTS Sulfonylurea, metformin, rosiglitazone, or pioglitazone therapy was prescribed for 11,200, 12,490, 1,879, and 806 patients, respectively. A total of 1,343 myocardial infarctions were identified. After adjustment for potential myocardial infarction risk factors, the relative risk for myocardial infarction with rosiglitazone was 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.6) compared with sulfonylurea, 2.2 (1.6-3.1) compared with metformin, and 2.2 (1.5-3.4) compared with pioglitazone. Prospective surveillance using these data would have identified increased risk for myocardial infarction with rosiglitazone compared with metformin within 18 months of its introduction with a risk ratio of 2.1 (95% CI 1.2-3.8). CONCLUSIONS Our results are consistent with a relative adverse cardiovascular risk profile for rosiglitazone. Our use of usual care electronic data sources from a large hospital network represents an innovative approach to rapid safety signal detection that may enable more effective postmarketing drug surveillance.
目的 利用从电子病历中获得的常规临床数据,评估识别糖尿病药物与心肌梗死之间潜在关联的能力。
研究设计和方法 我们定义了一个回顾性队列,其中包括在单个学术医疗保健网络中接受磺酰脲、二甲双胍、罗格列酮或吡格列酮治疗的患者(n = 34253)。所有患者年龄均> 18 岁,在 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2006 年 12 月 31 日期间至少有一次服用其中一种药物的处方。研究结果为需要住院治疗的急性心肌梗死。我们使用累积时间方法确定与其他疗法相比,最早可识别的罗格列酮相关风险的日历日期。
结果 磺酰脲、二甲双胍、罗格列酮或吡格列酮治疗分别用于 11200、12490、1879 和 806 例患者。共发现 1343 例心肌梗死。在调整了心肌梗死潜在危险因素后,与磺酰脲相比,罗格列酮发生心肌梗死的相对风险为 1.3(95%CI 1.1-1.6),与二甲双胍相比为 2.2(1.6-3.1),与吡格列酮相比为 2.2(1.5-3.4)。使用这些数据进行前瞻性监测,在罗格列酮推出后 18 个月内,与二甲双胍相比,罗格列酮发生心肌梗死的风险比为 2.1(95%CI 1.2-3.8),可识别出更高的风险。
结论 我们的结果与罗格列酮相对不良的心血管风险特征一致。我们使用来自大型医院网络的常规护理电子数据源是一种快速安全信号检测的创新方法,可能使药物上市后监测更加有效。