• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国综合剥夺指数的发展:与标准化死亡率的相关性

[Development of composite deprivation index for Korea: the correlation with standardized mortality ratio].

作者信息

Shin Hosung, Lee Suehyung, Chu Jang Min

机构信息

Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Prev Med Public Health. 2009 Nov;42(6):392-402. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.6.392.

DOI:10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.6.392
PMID:20009486
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this paper were to develop the composite deprivation index (CDI) for the sub-district (Eup-Myen-Dong) levels based on the theory of social exclusion and to explore the relationship between the CDI and the standardized mortality ratio (SMR).

METHODS

The paper calculated the age adjusted SMR and we included five dimensions of social exclusion for CDI; unemployment, poverty, housing, labor and social network. The proxy variables of the five dimensions were the proportion of unemployed males, the percent of recipients receiving National Basic Livelihood Security Act benefits, the proportion of households under the minimum housing standard, the proportion of people with a low social class and the proportion of single-parent household. All the variables were standardized using geometric transformation and then we summed up them for a single index. The paper utilized the 2004-2006 National Death Registry data, the 2003-2006 national residents' registration data, the 2005 Population Census data and the 2005-2006 means-tested benefit recipients' data.

RESULTS

The figures were 115.6, 105.8 and 105.1 for the CDI of metropolitan areas (big cities), middle size cities and rural areas, respectively. The distributional variation of the CDI was the highest in metropolitan areas (8.9 - 353.7) and the lowest was in the rural areas (26.8 - 209.7). The extent and relative differences of deprivation increased with urbanization. Compared to the Townsend and Carstairs index, the CDI better represented the characteristics of rural deprivation. The correlation with the SMR was statistically significant and the direction of the CDI effects on the SMR was in accordance with that of the previous studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings indicated mortality inequalities due to the difference in the CDI. Despite the attempt to improve deprivation measures, further research is warranted for the consensus development of a deprivation index.

摘要

目的

本文旨在基于社会排斥理论开发适用于街道(邑 - 面 - 洞)层面的综合剥夺指数(CDI),并探讨CDI与标准化死亡率(SMR)之间的关系。

方法

本文计算了年龄调整后的SMR,且纳入了用于CDI的社会排斥的五个维度;失业、贫困、住房、劳动力和社会网络。这五个维度的代理变量分别是失业男性比例、领取《国家基本生活保障法》福利的受助者百分比、低于最低住房标准的家庭比例、低社会阶层人群比例以及单亲家庭比例。所有变量均采用几何变换进行标准化,然后将它们相加得出一个单一指数。本文利用了2004 - 2006年国家死亡登记数据、2003 - 2006年全国居民登记数据、2005年人口普查数据以及2005 - 2006年经济状况调查福利受助者数据。

结果

大城市、中等规模城市和农村地区的CDI数值分别为115.6、105.8和105.1。CDI的分布差异在大城市中最高(8.9 - 353.7),在农村地区最低(26.8 - 209.7)。剥夺的程度和相对差异随着城市化程度的提高而增加。与汤森指数和卡斯尔斯指数相比,CDI能更好地体现农村剥夺的特征。与SMR的相关性具有统计学意义,且CDI对SMR的影响方向与先前研究一致。

结论

研究结果表明,由于CDI的差异导致了死亡率不平等。尽管试图改进剥夺测量方法,但仍有必要进行进一步研究以达成关于剥夺指数发展的共识。

相似文献

1
[Development of composite deprivation index for Korea: the correlation with standardized mortality ratio].韩国综合剥夺指数的发展:与标准化死亡率的相关性
J Prev Med Public Health. 2009 Nov;42(6):392-402. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.6.392.
2
[Comparisons of health inequalities in small areas with using the standardized mortality ratios in Korea].[韩国利用标准化死亡率对小区域健康不平等的比较]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2008 Sep;41(5):300-6. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.5.300.
3
Higher mortality in areas of lower socioeconomic position measured by a single index of deprivation in Japan.在日本,用单一贫困指数衡量的社会经济地位较低地区死亡率更高。
Public Health. 2007 Mar;121(3):163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.015. Epub 2007 Jan 12.
4
Pathways from deprivation to health differed between individual and neighborhood-based indices.从贫困到健康的路径在个体层面指标和社区层面指标之间存在差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;60(7):712-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.10.005. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
5
[The relationship between regional material deprivation and the standardized mortality ratio of the community residents aged 15-64 in Korea].[韩国15至64岁社区居民的地区物质匮乏与标准化死亡率之间的关系]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2006 Jan;39(1):46-52.
6
Czech socio-economic deprivation index and its correlation with mortality data.捷克社会经济剥夺指数及其与死亡率数据的相关性。
Int J Public Health. 2009;54(4):267-73. doi: 10.1007/s00038-008-7092-3.
7
Socioeconomic inequalities in suicidal ideation, parasuicides, and completed suicides in South Korea.韩国自杀意念、自杀未遂和自杀死亡的社会经济不平等现象。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(8):1254-61. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
8
Inequalities in cancer incidence and mortality across income groups and policy implications in South Korea.韩国不同收入群体间癌症发病率和死亡率的不平等现象及政策影响
Public Health. 2008 Mar;122(3):229-36. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
9
Spatial variability in mortality inequalities, socioeconomic deprivation, and air pollution in small areas of the Barcelona Metropolitan Region, Spain.西班牙巴塞罗那大都市区小区域内死亡率不平等、社会经济剥夺和空气污染的空间变异性。
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Oct 15;407(21):5501-23. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.028. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
10
The contribution of material, psychosocial, and behavioral factors in explaining educational and occupational mortality inequalities in a nationally representative sample of South Koreans: relative and absolute perspectives.在韩国具有全国代表性的样本中,物质、心理社会和行为因素在解释教育和职业死亡率不平等方面的作用:相对和绝对视角
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(5):858-66. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Area deprivation and premature cardiovascular mortality: a nationwide population-based study in South Korea.地区贫困与心血管疾病过早死亡率:韩国一项基于全国人口的研究。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;2(1):e000877. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000877. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Association between area deprivation index and concerns to COVID-19: A multi-level analysis of individual and area factors.地区贫困指数与对新冠病毒病的担忧之间的关联:个体因素与地区因素的多层次分析
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Dec 24;25:101580. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101580. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
The cost- effectiveness of early dental visit in infants and toddlers focused on regional deprivation in South Korea: A retrospective cohort study.
关注韩国地区贫困状况的婴幼儿早期看牙的成本效益:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 13;17(6):e0269770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269770. eCollection 2022.
4
The association between greenness exposure and COVID-19 incidence in South Korea: An ecological study.暴露于绿化环境与韩国 COVID-19 发病率之间的关联:一项生态学研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 1;832:154981. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154981. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
5
Spatial distribution of neighborhood-level housing prices and its association with all-cause mortality in Seoul, Korea (2013-2018): A spatial panel data analysis.韩国首尔邻里层面房价的空间分布及其与全因死亡率的关联(2013 - 2018年):一项空间面板数据分析
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Nov 11;16:100963. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100963. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Life Expectancy in Areas around Subway Stations in the Seoul Metropolitan Area in Korea, 2008-2017.韩国首尔大都市圈地铁站周边地区的预期寿命,2008-2017 年。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Nov 16;35(44):e365. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e365.
7
Assessment of Relative Asthma Risk in Populations Living Near Incineration Facilities in Seoul, Korea.评估韩国首尔附近垃圾焚烧设施周边居民的相对哮喘风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 13;17(20):7448. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207448.
8
Development of the Korean Community Health Determinants Index (K-CHDI).韩国社区健康决定因素指数(K-CHDI)的制定。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 8;15(10):e0240304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240304. eCollection 2020.
9
Subnational Burden of Disease According to the Sociodemographic Index in South Korea.韩国社会人口指数的疾病负担(下)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 10;17(16):5788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165788.
10
Comparison of three small-area mortality metrics according to urbanity in Korea: the standardized mortality ratio, comparative mortality figure, and life expectancy.比较韩国三种根据城市度划分的小区域死亡率指标:标准化死亡率比、比较死亡率和预期寿命。
Popul Health Metr. 2020 Jul 3;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12963-020-00210-7.