• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区域性创伤系统降低死亡率并改变入院率:一项前后对照研究。

Regional trauma system reduces mortality and changes admission rates: a before and after study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):339-43. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c0e910.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c0e910
PMID:20010086
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of the introduction of a regionalized trauma system.

BACKGROUND

Trauma systems have proven to be efficacious in reducing mortality in trauma patients in the United States. To date, this was not proven for inclusive trauma systems outside the United States. The current study evaluates the effect of the introduction of an inclusive trauma system in the Netherlands in 1999.

METHODS

Retrospective pre- and post analyses of a trauma care system on hospital discharge data regarding trauma patients admitted to hospitals in the central region of The Netherlands. Patients treated during 1996 to 1998 (control group), before implementation of the inclusive trauma system were compared with patients treated during 2003 to 2005 (index group) after the trauma system was installed. Risk adjusted odds-ratios of death and admission to a trauma center were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 33,201 patients were included in the control group and compared with 34,840 patients in the index group. After implementation of the trauma system, in-hospital mortality for all injured patients decreased from 2.6% to 2.3% (OR: 0.89 with 95% CI: 0.80-0.98). After adjustment for differences in gender, age, injury severity, comorbidity, injured body region, mechanism and intent of injury between both groups, the odds-ratio was 0.84 with 95% CI (0.76-0.94). Multitrauma patients were the subgroup admitted more frequently to a trauma center (OR: 1.19 with 95% CI: 1.01-1.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an inclusive trauma system in The Netherlands results in a more efficient triage system of trauma patients among hospitals and is associated with a substantial and statistically significant risk reduction (16%) of death.

摘要

目的

评估区域性创伤系统引入的效果。

背景

创伤系统已被证明可有效降低美国创伤患者的死亡率。迄今为止,这在美国以外的综合性创伤系统中尚未得到证实。本研究评估了 1999 年在荷兰引入综合性创伤系统的效果。

方法

对荷兰中部地区医院出院数据中创伤患者的创伤护理系统进行回顾性的预-后分析。比较了在实施综合性创伤系统之前(1996 年至 1998 年为对照组)接受治疗的患者与在创伤系统安装后(2003 年至 2005 年为指数组)接受治疗的患者。确定了死亡和入住创伤中心的风险调整比值比。

结果

对照组共纳入 33201 例患者,与指数组的 34840 例患者进行比较。实施创伤系统后,所有受伤患者的院内死亡率从 2.6%降至 2.3%(OR:0.89,95%CI:0.80-0.98)。调整两组之间的性别、年龄、损伤严重程度、合并症、受伤身体部位、损伤机制和受伤意图差异后,比值比为 0.84,95%CI(0.76-0.94)。多发伤患者更频繁地被收入创伤中心(OR:1.19,95%CI:1.01-1.39)。

结论

在荷兰实施综合性创伤系统可导致医院之间对创伤患者进行更有效的分诊系统,与死亡率显著降低(16%)相关。

相似文献

1
Regional trauma system reduces mortality and changes admission rates: a before and after study.区域性创伤系统降低死亡率并改变入院率:一项前后对照研究。
Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):339-43. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c0e910.
2
Inclusive trauma systems: do they improve triage or outcomes of the severely injured?包容性创伤系统:它们能改善重伤患者的分诊或治疗结果吗?
J Trauma. 2006 Mar;60(3):529-35; discussion 535-37. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000204022.36214.9e.
3
Level I versus Level II trauma centers: an outcomes-based assessment.一级创伤中心与二级创伤中心:基于结果的评估。
J Trauma. 2009 May;66(5):1321-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181929e2b.
4
Use of a state-wide administrative database in assessing a regional trauma system: the New York City experience.利用全州行政数据库评估区域创伤系统:纽约市的经验
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Apr;198(4):509-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.12.021.
5
Proportion of seriously injured patients admitted to hospitals in the US with a high annual injured patient volume: a metric of regionalized trauma care.美国每年收治重伤患者数量较多的医院中重伤患者的比例:区域创伤护理的一项指标。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Feb;206(2):212-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.08.019. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
6
Evaluation of trauma care by comparing mortality risks and admission policy in a Dutch trauma region.通过比较荷兰一个创伤地区的死亡风险和入院政策来评估创伤护理。
Injury. 2008 Sep;39(9):1007-12. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.03.026. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
7
Outcomes of trauma patients after transfer to a level I trauma center.创伤患者转至一级创伤中心后的结局。
J Trauma. 2008 Jun;64(6):1594-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181493099.
8
Do pediatric patients with trauma in Florida have reduced mortality rates when treated in designated trauma centers?在佛罗里达州,遭受创伤的儿科患者在指定创伤中心接受治疗时死亡率会降低吗?
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jan;43(1):212-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.047.
9
Improved trauma patient outcomes after implementation of a dedicated trauma admitting service.实施专门的创伤收治服务后创伤患者的治疗效果得到改善。
Injury. 2009 Jan;40(1):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.034. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
10
Pulmonary artery catheter use is associated with reduced mortality in severely injured patients: a National Trauma Data Bank analysis of 53,312 patients.肺动脉导管的使用与严重受伤患者死亡率降低相关:一项对53312名患者的国家创伤数据库分析。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1597-601. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000217918.03343.AA.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Korean Trauma and Injury Severity Score (K-TRISS) Model for Predicting Trauma Outcomes.用于预测创伤结局的韩国创伤和损伤严重程度评分(K-TRISS)模型的开发与验证
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Jun 30;40(25):e122. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e122.
2
Trauma systems: a global comparison.创伤系统:全球比较
OTA Int. 2025 May 2;8(3 Suppl):e376. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000376. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Development of trauma systems in Europe-reports from England, Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain.欧洲创伤系统的发展——来自英国、德国、荷兰和西班牙的报告。
OTA Int. 2023 Sep 1;2(Suppl 1):e019. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000019. eCollection 2019 Mar.
4
Traumatic Brain Injury in Honduras: The Use of a Paper-based Surveillance System to Characterize Injuries Patterns.洪都拉斯的创伤性脑损伤:使用基于纸张的监测系统来描述损伤模式。
Int J Med Stud. 2022 Dec 31;10(4):381-386. doi: 10.5195/ijms.2022.1384. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
5
Patterns, mechanism of injury and outcome of pediatric trauma at a level 1 trauma centre: a descriptive retrospective analysis.一级创伤中心儿童创伤的模式、损伤机制及结局:一项描述性回顾性分析
Front Pediatr. 2023 Apr 28;11:1084715. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1084715. eCollection 2023.
6
Is there a relationship between surgical volume and outcome for total elbow arthroplasty? A systematic review.全肘关节置换术的手术量与手术结果之间存在关联吗?一项系统评价。
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Jan 27;8(1):45-51. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0087.
7
Accuracy and influencing factors of the Field Triage Decision Scheme for adult trauma patients at a level-1 trauma center in Korea.韩国一级创伤中心成人创伤患者现场分诊决策方案的准确性及其影响因素。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 7;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00637-1.
8
Regular feedback on inter-hospital transfer improved the clinical outcome and survival in patients with multiple trauma: a retrospective cohort study.定期反馈院内转院情况可改善多发伤患者的临床结局和生存率:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Dec 3;21(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00543-y.
9
Management of severe trauma worldwide: implementation of trauma systems in emerging countries: China, Russia and South Africa.全球严重创伤管理:新兴国家创伤系统的实施:中国、俄罗斯和南非。
Crit Care. 2021 Aug 9;25(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03681-8.
10
The effectiveness of trauma care systems at different stages of development in reducing mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤护理系统在不同发展阶段降低死亡率的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jul 13;16(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00381-0.