Ghouri A F, Bodner M, White P F
Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
Anesthesiology. 1991 Mar;74(3):419-24. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199103000-00005.
Thirty-eight healthy outpatients undergoing elective surgical procedures lasting 1-3 h were randomly assigned to receive either desflurane 3% (approximately 0.5 MAC) or isoflurane 0.6% (approximately 0.5 MAC) for maintenance of general anesthesia with nitrous oxide 60% in oxygen after a standardized induction sequence consisting of fentanyl 3 micrograms.kg-1, thiopental 4 mg.kg-1, and succinylcholine 1-1.5 mg.kg-1, intravenously. Although anesthetic conditions were similar during operations in the two treatment groups, significant differences were noted in the recovery profiles as measured by elimination kinetics, psychometric testing, and visual analog scales (to assess subjective feelings). The time required for the end-tidal concentration to decrease by 50% was 2.5 +/- 0.8 min for desflurane vs. 9.5 +/- 3.4 min for isoflurane (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]). Times to awakening and ability to follow simple commands were significantly shorter after desflurane than after isoflurane (5.1 +/- 2.4 vs. 10.2 +/- 7.7 min 6.5 +/- 2.3 min vs. 11.1 +/- 7.9 min, respectively). Postoperatively, patients who received desflurane exhibited less impairment of cognitive function (as measured using the Digit-Symbol Substitution Test) than did those who received isoflurane. Furthermore, visual analog scores indicated that patients receiving desflurane experienced significantly less discomfort (pain), drowsiness, fatigue, clumsiness, and confusion in the early postoperative period. We conclude that desflurane may offer clinical advantages over isoflurane when used for maintenance of anesthesia during outpatient surgical procedures.
38名接受持续1 - 3小时择期外科手术的健康门诊患者,在静脉注射芬太尼3微克/千克、硫喷妥钠4毫克/千克和琥珀酰胆碱1 - 1.5毫克/千克组成的标准化诱导程序后,随机分配接受3%地氟烷(约0.5MAC)或0.6%异氟烷(约0.5MAC),并用60%氧化亚氮和氧气维持全身麻醉。尽管两个治疗组手术期间的麻醉条件相似,但通过消除动力学、心理测试和视觉模拟量表(以评估主观感受)测量的恢复情况存在显著差异。地氟烷呼气末浓度降低50%所需时间为2.5±0.8分钟,而异氟烷为9.5±3.4分钟(平均值±标准差[SD])。地氟烷组清醒时间和听从简单指令的能力明显短于异氟烷组(分别为5.1±2.4分钟对10.2±7.7分钟,6.5±2.3分钟对11.1±7.9分钟)。术后,接受地氟烷的患者认知功能受损程度(使用数字符号替换测试测量)低于接受异氟烷的患者。此外,视觉模拟评分表明,接受地氟烷的患者在术后早期的不适(疼痛)、嗜睡、疲劳、笨拙和困惑明显较少。我们得出结论,在门诊手术中用于维持麻醉时,地氟烷可能比异氟烷具有临床优势。