Grundmann U, Risch A, Kleinschmidt S, Klatt R, Larsen R
Klinik für Anaesthesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar.
Anaesthesist. 1998 Feb;47(2):102-10. doi: 10.1007/s001010050534.
To ascertain whether there is a difference between total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol (P) and remifentanil (R) and inhalational anaesthesia with desflurane (D) and nitrous oxide (N) with regard to haemodynamic reactions, recovery profile and postoperative analgesic demand in patients scheduled for elective microsurgical vertebral disc resection.
50 patients (ASA I-II, 18-65 years) were randomly assigned to receive total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil or inhalational anaesthesia with desflurane and nitrous oxide. After standardised induction of anaesthesia in both groups (1 microgram.kg-1 remifentanil, 1.5 mg.kg-1 propofol 0.1 mg.kg-1 cisatracurium), anaesthesia was maintained in the D/N group with desflurane in 50% N2O. The patients of the P/R group received a constant infusion of 2 mg.kg-1.h-1 propofol and a constant infusion of 0.5 microgram.kg-1.min-1 remifentanil, which was reduced after 15 min by 50%. The administration of desflurane and the infusion of the anaesthetics were adjusted to maintain a surgical depth of anaesthesia. At the end of surgery the anaesthetics were discontinued and early emergence from anaesthesia was assessed by measuring time to spontaneous ventilation (VT > 4 ml/kg), tracheal extubation, opening of the eyes and stating correct name and data of birth. The frequency of analgesics and total demand for analgesics were determined using patient-controlled analgesia and recorded for 2 h postoperatively. In addition the pain level of the patients was measured on a visual analogue scale and the incidence of postoperative shivering, nausea and vomiting was noted.
Patients anaesthetised with desflurane responded to tracheal intubation and skin incision with increasing blood pressure and showed higher heart rates than patients anaesthetised with propofol and remifentanil, but there were no other haemodynamic differences between the groups in response to surgical stimuli. There were significantly shorter times to spontaneous ventilation (3.2 vs. 6.3 min), extubation (3.8 vs. 9.5 min), eye opening (3.0 vs. 11.5 min) and giving name and date of birth (4.8 vs. 14.3 min) in patients anaesthetised with remifentanil and propofol than in those receiving desflurane and nitrous oxide. In addition, patients anaesthetised with remifentanil and propofol had a greater incidence of postoperative shivering. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the patients' pain scores, analgesic demand and incidence of nausea and vomiting.
Patients anaesthetised with propofol and remifentanil have significantly shorter emergence times than patients anaesthetised with desflurane and nitrous oxide. The low incidence of postoperative pain after microsurgical vertebral disc resections requires no large-scale analgesic therapy, even after total intravenous anaesthesia including remifentanil.
确定在择期显微椎间盘切除术患者中,丙泊酚(P)和瑞芬太尼(R)全静脉麻醉与地氟醚(D)和氧化亚氮(N)吸入麻醉在血流动力学反应、恢复情况及术后镇痛需求方面是否存在差异。
50例患者(ASA I-II级,18 - 65岁)被随机分配接受丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼全静脉麻醉或地氟醚和氧化亚氮吸入麻醉。两组在标准化麻醉诱导后(1微克·千克⁻¹瑞芬太尼、1.5毫克·千克⁻¹丙泊酚、0.1毫克·千克⁻¹顺式阿曲库铵),D/N组用50%氧化亚氮中的地氟醚维持麻醉。P/R组患者持续输注2毫克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹丙泊酚和持续输注0.5微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹瑞芬太尼,15分钟后减少50%。调整地氟醚给药及麻醉药输注以维持手术麻醉深度。手术结束时停用麻醉药,通过测量自主呼吸恢复时间(潮气量>4毫升/千克)、气管拔管、睁眼及说出正确姓名和出生日期来评估麻醉苏醒情况。使用患者自控镇痛确定镇痛药使用频率及镇痛药总需求量,并记录术后2小时情况。此外,用视觉模拟评分法测量患者疼痛程度,记录术后寒战、恶心和呕吐发生率。
地氟醚麻醉患者气管插管和皮肤切开时血压升高,心率高于丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉患者,但两组对手术刺激的血流动力学反应无其他差异。瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚麻醉患者的自主呼吸恢复时间(3.2分钟对6.3分钟)、拔管时间(3.8分钟对9.5分钟)、睁眼时间(3.0分钟对11.5分钟)及说出姓名和出生日期时间(4.8分钟对14.3分钟)显著短于接受地氟醚和氧化亚氮麻醉的患者。此外,瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚麻醉患者术后寒战发生率更高。两组患者疼痛评分、镇痛需求及恶心呕吐发生率无显著差异。
丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉患者的苏醒时间显著短于地氟醚和氧化亚氮麻醉患者。显微椎间盘切除术后疼痛发生率低,即使在包括瑞芬太尼的全静脉麻醉后也无需大规模镇痛治疗。