Griffin Noelle M, Yu Jingyi, Long Fred, Oh Phil, Shore Sabrina, Li Yan, Koziol Jim A, Schnitzer Jan E
Proteogenomics Research Institute for Systems Medicine, San Diego, California, USA.
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Jan;28(1):83-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1592. Epub 2009 Dec 13.
Replicate mass spectrometry (MS) measurements and the use of multiple analytical methods can greatly expand the comprehensiveness of shotgun proteomic profiling of biological samples. However, the inherent biases and variations in such data create computational and statistical challenges for quantitative comparative analysis. We developed and tested a normalized, label-free quantitative method termed the normalized spectral index (SI(N)), which combines three MS abundance features: peptide count, spectral count and fragment-ion (tandem MS or MS/MS) intensity. SI(N) largely eliminated variances between replicate MS measurements, permitting quantitative reproducibility and highly significant quantification of thousands of proteins detected in replicate MS measurements of the same and distinct samples. It accurately predicts protein abundance more often than the five other methods we tested. Comparative immunoblotting and densitometry further validate our method. Comparative quantification of complex data sets from multiple shotgun proteomics measurements is relevant for systems biology and biomarker discovery.
重复质谱(MS)测量以及使用多种分析方法能够极大地拓展生物样品鸟枪法蛋白质组分析的全面性。然而,此类数据中固有的偏差和变化给定量比较分析带来了计算和统计方面的挑战。我们开发并测试了一种名为归一化谱指数(SI(N))的归一化、无标记定量方法,该方法结合了三种质谱丰度特征:肽段计数、谱图计数和碎片离子(串联质谱或MS/MS)强度。SI(N)在很大程度上消除了重复质谱测量之间的差异,实现了定量重现性以及对在相同和不同样品的重复质谱测量中检测到的数千种蛋白质进行高度显著的定量。与我们测试的其他五种方法相比,它更常能准确预测蛋白质丰度。比较免疫印迹法和光密度测定法进一步验证了我们的方法。对来自多次鸟枪法蛋白质组学测量的复杂数据集进行比较定量,对于系统生物学和生物标志物发现具有重要意义。