• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用随机试验中的就业率作为支持性就业计划绩效基准的可行性。

Viability of using employment rates from randomized trials as benchmarks for supported employment program performance.

机构信息

Department of Counseling and Personnel Services, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Sep;37(5):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s10488-009-0258-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10488-009-0258-3
PMID:20013044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4636006/
Abstract

Cumulative employment rates published by randomized trials are based on each enrollee's pre-planned 18-24-months of study participation. By contrast, community programs typically report employment rates for clients active in services during a calendar quarter. Using data from three supported employment programs in randomized trials, we show that trial cumulative employment rates are about twice as large as quarterly employment rates for the same program. Therefore, we recommend that administrators, service networks, and mental health authorities begin to publish quarterly employment rates, and quarterly median earnings, to allow policymakers to set realistic performance expectations for supported employment programs.

摘要

随机试验公布的累计就业率是基于每个入组者预先计划的 18-24 个月的研究参与。相比之下,社区项目通常报告在一个日历季度内活跃于服务的客户的就业率。我们使用来自随机试验中的三个支持性就业项目的数据表明,试验累计就业率大约是相同项目季度就业率的两倍。因此,我们建议管理人员、服务网络和精神卫生部门开始公布季度就业率和季度中位数收入,以便政策制定者为支持性就业项目设定现实的绩效预期。

相似文献

1
Viability of using employment rates from randomized trials as benchmarks for supported employment program performance.使用随机试验中的就业率作为支持性就业计划绩效基准的可行性。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Sep;37(5):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s10488-009-0258-3.
2
Health plan options at fortune 100 companies: available coverage for mental health care consumers.财富100强公司的健康保险计划选项:为心理健康护理消费者提供的可用保险范围。
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Jun;54(6):815-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.6.815.
3
Easing the costs of mental health benefits.减轻心理健康福利的成本。
Pers Adm. 1988 Nov;33(11):62-7.
4
Supported Education and Employment Services for Young People with Early Psychosis in OnTrackNY.纽约OnTrack项目为患有早期精神病的年轻人提供的支持性教育和就业服务。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2019 Sep 1;22(3):95-108.
5
Supported employment outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of ACT and clubhouse models.强化个案管理(ACT)与俱乐部模式随机对照试验的就业支持成果
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Oct;57(10):1406-15. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.10.1406.
6
Data watch. Gearing up for parity.数据观察。为平等做准备。
Bus Health. 1997 Dec;15(12):56.
7
Understanding results from randomized trials: use of program- and client-level data to study medical and nonmedical treatment programs.理解随机试验的结果:利用项目和客户层面的数据研究医疗和非医疗治疗项目。
J Stud Alcohol. 2005 Sep;66(5):682-7. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2005.66.682.
8
Behavioral health benefits in employer-sponsored health plans, 1997.1997年雇主赞助的健康计划中的行为健康福利。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1999 Mar-Apr;18(2):67-78. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.2.67.
9
Choice of health insurance and the two-worker household.健康保险的选择与双职工家庭
Health Aff (Millwood). 1991 Spring;10(1):155-63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.10.1.155.
10
For mental health cost problems, see a specialist.对于心理健康成本问题,请咨询专家。
Bus Health. 1993 Nov;11(13):59-61, 64.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of supported employment in non-trial routine implementation: systematic review and meta-analysis.支持性就业在非试验常规实施中的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 May;54(5):525-531. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1577-z. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
2
Does Competitive Work Improve Quality of Life for Adults with Severe Mental Illness? Evidence from a Randomized Trial of Supported Employment.竞争性工作能否改善重度精神疾病成年人的生活质量?来自支持性就业随机试验的证据。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr;43(2):155-71. doi: 10.1007/s11414-014-9392-0.
3
Social value of supported employment for psychosocial program participants.支持性就业对心理社会项目参与者的社会价值。
Psychiatr Q. 2011 Mar;82(1):69-84. doi: 10.1007/s11126-010-9148-9.

本文引用的文献

1
A measurement feedback system (MFS) is necessary to improve mental health outcomes.测量反馈系统(MFS)对于改善心理健康结果是必要的。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;47(10):1114-9. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181825af8. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
2
Preference in random assignment: implications for the interpretation of randomized trials.随机分配中的偏好:对随机试验解释的影响。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009 Sep;36(5):331-42. doi: 10.1007/s10488-009-0224-0. Epub 2009 May 12.
3
An update on randomized controlled trials of evidence-based supported employment.基于证据的支持性就业随机对照试验的最新情况。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2008 Spring;31(4):280-90. doi: 10.2975/31.4.2008.280.290.
4
Supported employment outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of ACT and clubhouse models.强化个案管理(ACT)与俱乐部模式随机对照试验的就业支持成果
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Oct;57(10):1406-15. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.10.1406.
5
Employment and mental health service utilization in Washington State.华盛顿州的就业与心理健康服务利用情况
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul;33(3):287-303. doi: 10.1007/s11414-006-9026-2.
6
Randomized trial of supported employment integrated with assertive community treatment for rural adults with severe mental illness.针对患有严重精神疾病的农村成年人,将支持性就业与积极社区治疗相结合的随机试验。
Schizophr Bull. 2006 Apr;32(2):378-95. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbi056. Epub 2005 Sep 21.
7
Results of a multisite randomized trial of supported employment interventions for individuals with severe mental illness.针对重度精神疾病患者的支持性就业干预多中心随机试验结果。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 May;62(5):505-12. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.5.505.
8
Impact of referral source and study applicants' preference for randomly assigned service on research enrollment, service engagement, and evaluative outcomes.转诊来源以及研究申请人对随机分配服务的偏好对研究入组、服务参与和评估结果的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;162(4):781-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.781.
9
Vocational rehabilitation in schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: a literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.精神分裂症及其他精神障碍的职业康复:一项随机对照试验的文献综述与荟萃分析
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2003 Aug;191(8):515-23. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000082213.42509.69.
10
The ICCD benchmarks for clubhouses: a practical approach to quality improvement in psychiatric rehabilitation.俱乐部会所的国际俱乐部会所诊断标准:精神康复质量提升的实用方法。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Feb;52(2):207-13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.2.207.