• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Carcinoma of the middle bile duct: is bile duct segmental resection appropriate?中段胆管癌:胆管节段切除术是否合适?
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec 21;15(47):5966-71. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5966.
2
Comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomy and bile duct resection for middle bile duct cancer: A multi-center collaborating study of Japan and Korea.日本和韩国多中心合作研究:胰十二指肠切除术与胆管切除术治疗中段胆管癌的比较。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Jun;27(6):289-298. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.724. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
3
Prognostic factors in patients with middle and distal bile duct cancers.中、远端胆管癌患者的预后因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 7;20(21):6658-65. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6658.
4
Prognostic Factors for Distal Bile Duct Carcinoma After Surgery.远端胆管癌手术后的预后因素。
Kurume Med J. 2023 Jul 3;68(2):81-89. doi: 10.2739/kurumemedj.MS682002. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
5
Benefits and limitations of middle bile duct segmental resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.肝外胆管癌中段胆管节段切除术的获益与局限性。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2020 Apr;19(2):147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
6
[Significance of positive ductal margin and prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct carcinoma].[中段及远端胆管癌手术切缘阳性的意义及预后因素]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 May 1;47(9):677-80.
7
Is Pancreaticoduodenectomy Feasible for Recurrent Remnant Bile Duct Cancer Following Bile Duct Segmental Resection?胆管节段切除术后复发性残余胆管癌行胰十二指肠切除术是否可行?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Dec;19(12):2138-45. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2927-8. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
8
Prognostic factors for radical resection of middle and distal bile duct cancer.中、下段胆管癌根治性切除的预后因素。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Mar-Apr;56(90):294-8.
9
Carcinoma of the distal and middle bile duct: surgical results, prognostic factors, and long-term follow-up.肝外胆管中下段癌:手术结果、预后因素及长期随访
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15(5):501-7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-007-1308-4. Epub 2008 Oct 4.
10
Treatment of mid-bile duct carcinoma: Local resection or pancreatoduodenectomy?中段胆管癌的治疗:局部切除术还是胰十二指肠切除术?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;45(11):2180-2187. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.032. Epub 2019 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Cholangiocarcinoma of the Middle Bile Duct: A Narrative Review.肝内胆管癌:一篇叙述性综述。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6504-6513. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15567-4. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
2
Survival Comparison of Different Operation Types for Middle Bile Duct Cancer: Bile Duct Resection versus Pancreaticoduodenectomy Considering Complications and Adjuvant Treatment Effects.中段胆管癌不同手术方式的生存比较:考虑并发症及辅助治疗效果的胆管切除术与胰十二指肠切除术对比
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 10;16(2):297. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020297.
3
Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct with metachronous development in the downstream bile duct after radical resection.胆管内乳头状肿瘤,根治性切除术后下游胆管异时性发展。
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb;17(1):155-163. doi: 10.1007/s12328-023-01867-x. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
4
The prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma after curative intended surgery: A single-center retrospective study.根治性手术后远端胆管癌患者淋巴结比率的预后价值:一项单中心回顾性研究
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2022 May 31;26(2):168-177. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.21-126.
5
Radiologic Evaluation and Structured Reporting Form for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer: 2019 Consensus Recommendations from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.肝外胆管癌的放射学评估和结构化报告表:韩国腹部放射学会 2019 年共识建议。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Jan;22(1):41-62. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0803. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
6
Comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomy and bile duct resection for middle bile duct cancer: A multi-center collaborating study of Japan and Korea.日本和韩国多中心合作研究:胰十二指肠切除术与胆管切除术治疗中段胆管癌的比较。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Jun;27(6):289-298. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.724. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
7
Comparison of the clinical results of surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma and mid-to-distal cholangiocarcinoma.肝外胆管癌手术切除的临床结果比较:肝门部胆管癌与中下段胆管癌。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2019 Nov;23(4):319-326. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.4.319. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
8
Relevant prognostic factors influencing outcome of patients after surgical resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma.影响远端胆管癌患者手术切除后预后的相关预后因素。
BMC Surg. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0384-5.
9
Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer.胆管节段性切除术与胰十二指肠切除术治疗胆总管中下段癌的对比
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 May;94(5):240-246. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.94.5.240. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
The Likely Sites of Nodal Metastasis Differs According to the Tumor Extent in Distal Bile Duct Cancer.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Sep;20(9):1618-27. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3179-y. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and surgical margin status for distal cholangiocarcinoma.淋巴结转移及手术切缘状态对远端胆管癌的预后意义
J Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar 1;95(3):207-12. doi: 10.1002/jso.20668.
2
Prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct cancer: an analysis of 55 patients concerning the significance of ductal and radial margins.中、远端胆管癌手术切除的预后因素:55例患者关于胆管切缘和径向切缘意义的分析
Surgery. 2005 Apr;137(4):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.10.008.
3
Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection.肝外胆管癌手术切除后的实际长期预后。
Ann Surg. 2005 Jan;241(1):77-84. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000150166.94732.88.
4
Patterns and relevant factors of tumor recurrence for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma after radical resection.肝外胆管癌根治性切除术后肿瘤复发的模式及相关因素
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Nov-Dec;51(60):1612-8.
5
Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for distal bile duct cancer.远端胆管癌行胰十二指肠切除术并扩大淋巴结清扫术后的预后因素
Arch Surg. 2002 Jan;137(1):69-73. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.1.69.
6
Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.225例肝门部胆管癌患者的分期、可切除性及预后
Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):507-17; discussion 517-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00010.
7
Prognostic significance of lymph node involvement in middle and distal bile duct cancer.淋巴结受累在中、远端胆管癌中的预后意义。
Surgery. 2001 Jun;129(6):677-83. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.114555.
8
Treatment strategy for patients with middle and lower third bile duct cancer.中下段胆管癌患者的治疗策略
Br J Surg. 2001 Mar;88(3):364-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01685.x.
9
Aggressive preoperative management and extended surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Nagoya experience.肝门部胆管癌的积极术前管理与扩大手术:名古屋经验
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7(2):155-62. doi: 10.1007/s005340050170.
10
Surgical treatment and postoperative outcomes for middle and lower bile duct carcinoma in Japan--experience of a single institute.日本中下段胆管癌的外科治疗及术后结果——单机构经验
Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 May-Jun;47(33):650-7.

中段胆管癌:胆管节段切除术是否合适?

Carcinoma of the middle bile duct: is bile duct segmental resection appropriate?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 135-710, South Korea.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec 21;15(47):5966-71. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5966.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.15.5966
PMID:20014461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2795184/
Abstract

AIM

To compare survival between bile duct segmental resection (BDSR) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for treating distal bile duct cancers.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted for 45 patients in a BDSR group and for 149 patients in a PD group.

RESULTS

The T-stage (P < 0.001), lymph node invasion (P = 0.010) and tumor differentiation (P = 0.005) were significant prognostic factors in the BDSR group. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates for the BDSR group and PD group were 51.7% and 36.6%, respectively and 46.0% and 38.1%, respectively (P = 0.099). The BDSR group and PD group did not show any significant difference in survival when this was adjusted for the TNM stage. The 3- and 5-year survival rates were: stage Ia [BDSR (100.0% and 100.0%) vs PD (76.9% and 68.4%) (P = 0.226)]; stage Ib [BDSR (55.8% and 32.6%) vs PD (59.3% and 59.3%) (P = 0.942)]; stage IIb [BDSR (19.2% and 19.2%) vs PD (31.9% and 14.2%) (P = 0.669)].

CONCLUSION

BDSR can be justified as an alternative radical operation for patients with middle bile duct in selected patients with no adjacent organ invasion and resection margin is negative.

摘要

目的

比较胆管节段切除术(BDSR)和胰十二指肠切除术(PD)治疗远端胆管癌的生存情况。

方法

回顾性分析 45 例 BDSR 组和 149 例 PD 组患者。

结果

BDSR 组的 T 分期(P<0.001)、淋巴结侵犯(P=0.010)和肿瘤分化(P=0.005)是显著的预后因素。BDSR 组和 PD 组的 3 年和 5 年总生存率分别为 51.7%和 36.6%,46.0%和 38.1%(P=0.099)。当按 TNM 分期调整时,BDSR 组和 PD 组的生存无显著差异。3 年和 5 年生存率为:Ia 期[BDSR(100.0%和 100.0%)vs PD(76.9%和 68.4%)(P=0.226)];Ib 期[BDSR(55.8%和 32.6%)vs PD(59.3%和 59.3%)(P=0.942)];IIb 期[BDSR(19.2%和 19.2%)vs PD(31.9%和 14.2%)(P=0.669)]。

结论

BDSR 可作为一种选择性根治性手术方法,适用于无邻近器官侵犯且切缘阴性的中胆管癌患者。