• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆管节段性切除术与胰十二指肠切除术治疗胆总管中下段癌的对比

Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer.

作者信息

Kim Naru, Lee Huisong, Min Seog Ki, Lee Hyeon Kook

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 May;94(5):240-246. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.94.5.240. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

DOI:10.4174/astr.2018.94.5.240
PMID:29732355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5931934/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare survival outcomes between bile duct segmental resection (BDR) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for the treatment of middle and distal bile duct cancer.

METHODS

From 1997 to 2013, a total of 96 patients who underwent curative intent surgery for middle and distal bile duct cancer were identified. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of operation; 20 patients were included in the BDR group and 76 patients were in the PD group. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The number of lymph nodes (LNs) was significantly greater in patients within the PD group compared to the BDR group. The total number of LNs was 6.5 ± 8.2 . 11.2 ± 8.2 (P = 0.017) and the number of metastatic LNs was 0.4 ± 0.9 . 1.0 ± 1.5 (P = 0.021), respectively. After a median follow-up period of 24 months (range, 4-169 months), the recurrence-free survival of the PD group was superior to that of the BDR group (P = 0.035). In the patients with LN metastases, the patients undergoing PD had significantly better survival than the BDR group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should be cautious in deciding to perform BDR for middle and distal common bile duct cancer. PD is recommended if LN metastases are suspected.

摘要

目的

比较胆管节段性切除术(BDR)和胰十二指肠切除术(PD)治疗中、远端胆管癌的生存结果。

方法

1997年至2013年,共确定96例接受中、远端胆管癌根治性手术的患者。根据手术类型将患者分为两组;BDR组纳入20例患者,PD组纳入76例患者。我们回顾性分析了临床结果。

结果

PD组患者的淋巴结(LNs)数量显著多于BDR组。LNs总数分别为6.5±8.2、11.2±8.2(P = 0.017),转移LNs数量分别为0.4±0.9、1.0±1.5(P = 0.021)。中位随访期24个月(范围4 - 169个月)后,PD组的无复发生存率优于BDR组(P = 0.035)。在有LN转移的患者中,接受PD手术的患者生存情况明显优于BDR组(P < 0.001)。

结论

外科医生在决定对中、远端胆总管癌进行BDR时应谨慎。如果怀疑有LN转移,建议行PD手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/5931934/fdaa60dc6070/astr-94-240-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/5931934/3e8af24be9de/astr-94-240-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/5931934/5c4a9248b6e9/astr-94-240-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/5931934/fdaa60dc6070/astr-94-240-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/5931934/3e8af24be9de/astr-94-240-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/5931934/5c4a9248b6e9/astr-94-240-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c06/5931934/fdaa60dc6070/astr-94-240-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer.胆管节段性切除术与胰十二指肠切除术治疗胆总管中下段癌的对比
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 May;94(5):240-246. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.94.5.240. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
2
Middle and distal bile duct carcinoma, retrospective analysis & short-term and long-term outcomes of surgical therapy.肝门部及远端胆管癌:手术治疗的回顾性分析及短期和长期疗效
Rozhl Chir. 2022 Fall;101(9):436-442. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2022.101.9.436-442.
3
Benefits and limitations of middle bile duct segmental resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.肝外胆管癌中段胆管节段切除术的获益与局限性。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2020 Apr;19(2):147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
4
Survival Comparison of Different Operation Types for Middle Bile Duct Cancer: Bile Duct Resection versus Pancreaticoduodenectomy Considering Complications and Adjuvant Treatment Effects.中段胆管癌不同手术方式的生存比较:考虑并发症及辅助治疗效果的胆管切除术与胰十二指肠切除术对比
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 10;16(2):297. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020297.
5
Prognostic factors in patients with middle and distal bile duct cancers.中、远端胆管癌患者的预后因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 7;20(21):6658-65. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6658.
6
Treatment of mid-bile duct carcinoma: Local resection or pancreatoduodenectomy?中段胆管癌的治疗:局部切除术还是胰十二指肠切除术?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;45(11):2180-2187. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.032. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
7
Oncologic Reappraisal of Bile Duct Resection for Middle-Third Cholangiocarcinoma.中段胆管癌胆管切除术的肿瘤学再评估
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;28(4):1990-1999. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09157-3. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Length in Patients Undergoing Resection for Mid-Common Bile Duct Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.中胆总管癌切除患者切缘长度对预后的影响:单中心经验。
Dig Surg. 2021;38(3):212-221. doi: 10.1159/000513563. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
9
Survival outcome and prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter study.远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除术后的生存结果及预后因素:一项回顾性多中心研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Aug;402(5):831-840. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1590-9. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
10
Surgical technique and results of intrapancreatic bile duct resection for hilar malignancy (with video).胰内胆管切除治疗肝门部恶性肿瘤的手术技术和结果(附有视频)。
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Dec;20(12):1145-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival Comparison of Different Operation Types for Middle Bile Duct Cancer: Bile Duct Resection versus Pancreaticoduodenectomy Considering Complications and Adjuvant Treatment Effects.中段胆管癌不同手术方式的生存比较:考虑并发症及辅助治疗效果的胆管切除术与胰十二指肠切除术对比
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 10;16(2):297. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020297.
2
Impact of Nrf2 overexpression on cholangiocarcinoma treatment and clinical prognosis.Nrf2过表达对胆管癌治疗及临床预后的影响。
Korean J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun;19(1):18-26. doi: 10.14216/kjco.23004. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
3
Double rarity: malignant masquerade biliary stricture in a situs inversus totalis patient.

本文引用的文献

1
The natural course of pancreatic fistula and fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: is drain insertion needed?胰体尾切除术后胰瘘和积液的自然病程:是否需要放置引流管?
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Nov;91(5):247-253. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.91.5.247. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
2
Complications of pancreato-duodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术的并发症。
Rozhl Chir. 2016 Feb;95(2):53-9.
3
Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma.远端胆管癌淋巴结转移的预后影响。
双重罕见:完全性内脏反位患者的恶性伪装性胆道狭窄。
BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 21;21(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01155-w.
Br J Surg. 2015 Mar;102(4):399-406. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9752. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
4
Update on the management of cholangiocarcinoma.胆管癌管理的最新进展。
Dig Dis. 2014;32(5):570-8. doi: 10.1159/000360507. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
5
Prognostic factors in patients with middle and distal bile duct cancers.中、远端胆管癌患者的预后因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 7;20(21):6658-65. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6658.
6
Advanced age is a risk factor for post-operative complications and mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.高龄是胰十二指肠切除术后术后并发症和死亡率的一个危险因素:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
HPB (Oxford). 2012 Oct;14(10):649-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00506.x. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
7
Late complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy.胰十二指肠切除术后胰胃吻合术的晚期并发症。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 May;16(5):914-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1805-2. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
8
Clinical impact of intraoperative histological examination of the ductal resection margin in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.肝外胆管癌术中胆管切除缘组织学检查的临床影响。
Br J Surg. 2010 Sep;97(9):1363-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7122.
9
Carcinoma of the middle bile duct: is bile duct segmental resection appropriate?中段胆管癌:胆管节段切除术是否合适?
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec 21;15(47):5966-71. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5966.
10
Carcinoma of the distal and middle bile duct: surgical results, prognostic factors, and long-term follow-up.肝外胆管中下段癌:手术结果、预后因素及长期随访
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15(5):501-7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-007-1308-4. Epub 2008 Oct 4.