• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其一家研究医院的新生儿听力筛查项目成果

Newborn hearing screening programme outcomes in a research hospital from Turkey.

作者信息

Tasci Y, Muderris I I, Erkaya S, Altinbas S, Yucel H, Haberal A

机构信息

Ankara Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Maternity and Women's Health Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Etlik, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Child Care Health Dev. 2010 May;36(3):317-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01029.x. Epub 2009 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01029.x
PMID:20015280
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Universal neonatal hearing screening programmes are encouraged to define and manage hearing loss in early ages of life. The aim of this study is to introduce our 14-month three-step hearing screening programme results with 16 975 births in Turkey.

METHODS

In healthy neonates, Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission (TEOAE) is served as the initial screening in the first day of life. In newborns that did not meet pass criteria TEOAE was repeated in 10-day period. If the second test was 'refer' again, the screening was completed with auditory brainstem response (ABR). Additionally, ABR was performed for the neonates with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) requirement and at high audiologic risk. Neonates who failed the screening test with ABR were referred for further evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 15 323 newborns and 1652 NICU infants were tested. The screening coverage was 94.4%; 14 521 neonates (94.7%) passed the first screening step (TEOAE), while 802 (5.2%) neonate failed. In total, 322 (40.1%) of the neonates out of 802 was subjected to the second TEOAE after 10 days have failed and ABR was applied. From the neonates participated the third step (ABR) totalling 1974, 43 (2.17%) of neonates obtained a 'refer' response. Out of these 43 neonates, 17 neonates were (39.5%) NICU infants. From the 43 neonates, 38 cases (88.4%) were found to have hearing impairment. The false-positive rate for first step screening with TEOAE was 4.9%; second step with TEOAE was 1.85% and for ABR was 0.25%.

CONCLUSIONS

It is apparent that three step national hearing screening programme which has been applied for the latest years in Turkey is an accurate and non-invasive method to determine the congenital hearing loss. In the future, screening programmes could be rearranged with two steps as initial with TEOAE and retest with ABR and the coverage of the screening programme can be extended.

摘要

背景

鼓励实施新生儿听力普遍筛查项目,以便在生命早期对听力损失进行界定和管理。本研究旨在介绍我们在土耳其针对16975例出生婴儿开展的为期14个月的三步听力筛查项目结果。

方法

对于健康新生儿,瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)作为出生第一天的初次筛查。未通过TEOAE筛查标准的新生儿在10天内重复进行该检查。如果第二次检查结果仍为“转诊”,则通过听性脑干反应(ABR)完成筛查。此外,对有新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)需求和高听力风险的新生儿进行ABR检查。ABR筛查未通过的新生儿被转诊进行进一步评估。

结果

共对15323例新生儿和1652例NICU婴儿进行了检测。筛查覆盖率为94.4%;14521例新生儿(94.7%)通过了第一步筛查(TEOAE),而802例(5.2%)新生儿未通过。在802例未通过的新生儿中,共有322例(40.1%)在10天后进行了第二次TEOAE检查,随后接受了ABR检查。在参与第三步(ABR)检查的1974例新生儿中,43例(2.17%)新生儿的检查结果为“转诊”。在这43例新生儿中,17例(39.5%)为NICU婴儿。在这43例新生儿中,38例(88.4%)被发现有听力障碍。TEOAE第一步筛查的假阳性率为4.9%;TEOAE第二步筛查的假阳性率为1.85%,ABR筛查的假阳性率为0.25%。

结论

显然,土耳其近年来实施的三步国家听力筛查项目是一种准确且无创的先天性听力损失检测方法。未来,筛查项目可重新安排为两步,第一步采用TEOAE,第二步采用ABR进行复测,同时扩大筛查项目的覆盖范围。

相似文献

1
Newborn hearing screening programme outcomes in a research hospital from Turkey.土耳其一家研究医院的新生儿听力筛查项目成果
Child Care Health Dev. 2010 May;36(3):317-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01029.x. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
2
Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.高危新生儿听力筛查的可靠性:耳声发射、自动和传统听性脑干反应的比较研究
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;118(4):869-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.12.015. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
3
An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry.在一个发展中国家分娩率高的三级医院中,采用瞬态诱发耳声发射和脑干诱发反应测听法进行普遍的婴儿听力筛查的替代策略。
J Laryngol Otol. 2007 Jul;121(7):639-43. doi: 10.1017/S0022215106004403. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
4
Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns.新生儿听力普遍筛查:意大利锡耶纳对19700名新生儿的筛查经验。
Early Hum Dev. 2007 Sep;83(9):601-6. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
5
Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.用于普遍新生儿听力筛查项目的两步瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)与自动听性脑干反应(AABR)的比较
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Aug;72(8):1193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.04.011. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
6
Audiologic evaluation of neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses.使用瞬态诱发耳声发射和听觉脑干反应对患有严重高胆红素血症的新生儿进行听力学评估。
Laryngoscope. 1999 Dec;109(12):2005-8. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199912000-00021.
7
A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.一项关于有多少永久性听力损失婴儿通过两阶段耳声发射/自动听性脑干反应新生儿听力筛查方案的多中心评估。
Pediatrics. 2005 Sep;116(3):663-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1688.
8
[A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high-risk neonates].[高危新生儿听力筛查中听性脑干反应与耳声发射的比较]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;10(4):460-3.
9
Implementation of a nation-wide automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening programme in neonatal intensive care units.在新生儿重症监护病房实施全国性自动听性脑干反应听力筛查计划。
Acta Paediatr. 2003;92(3):332-8.
10
Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first month of life.出生后第一个月内瞬态诱发耳声发射的变化。
Ear Hear. 2009 Jun;30(3):330-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819c4000.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality measures of two-stage newborn hearing screening: systematic review and meta-analysis.两阶段新生儿听力筛查的质量指标:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 16;13:1566478. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566478. eCollection 2025.
2
Early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) programmes for infants and young children in low-income and middle-income countries in Asia: a systematic review.亚洲低收入和中等收入国家婴幼儿早期听力检测和干预 (EHDI) 方案:系统评价。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Jan;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001752.
3
The Hearing Status of Preterm Infant's ≤ 34 Weeks as Revealed by Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE) Screening and Diagnostic Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA): A Tertiary Center Experience.
通过耳声发射(OAE)筛查和诊断性脑干听觉诱发电位(BERA)揭示的孕周≤34周早产儿的听力状况:三级中心经验
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;74(Suppl 1):178-183. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01945-3. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
4
Burden of neurodevelopmental disorders in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家神经发育障碍的负担:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Wellcome Open Res. 2017 Dec 29;2:121. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13540.3. eCollection 2017.
5
Newborn hearing screening outcomes during the first decade of the program in a reference hospital from Turkey.土耳其一家参考医院在该项目开展的头十年期间的新生儿听力筛查结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 May;273(5):1143-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3654-1. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
Prevalence of hearing loss in newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care unit.入住新生儿重症监护病房的新生儿听力损失患病率。
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Summer;24(68):129-34.