Suppr超能文献

所罗门群岛一项基于群组随机对照交叉设计的药浸蚊帐可接受性和偏好的现场试验:社区参与制定消除疟疾政策。

A cluster randomized controlled cross-over bed net acceptability and preference trial in Solomon Islands: community participation in shaping policy for malaria elimination.

机构信息

Pacific Malaria Initiative Support Centre, Australian Centre for International and Tropical Health, School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Malar J. 2009 Dec 16;8:298. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-298.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A key component of the malaria elimination strategy in Solomon Islands (SI) is widespread coverage of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs). The success of this strategy is dependent on LLIN acceptability and compliance. There has been unresolved debate among policy makers and donors as to which type of LLIN would be most appropriate for large-scale distribution in SI, and anecdotal reports of a lack of acceptability of certain brands of LLINs. A cluster randomized controlled crossover bed net acceptability and preference trial was therefore carried out from July to September, 2008 to inform policy and to facilitate community engagement and participation in the selection of the most appropriate LLIN for use in SI.

METHOD

A three-stage sampling method was used to randomly select the study population from Malaita Province, SI. Three brands of LLINs were assessed in this study: Olyset, PermaNet and DuraNet. Bed net acceptability and preference were evaluated through surveys at three defined time points after short and longer-term trial of each LLIN.

RESULTS

The acceptability of PermaNet after short-term use (96.5%) was significantly greater than Olyset (67.3%, p < 0.001) and DuraNet (69.8%, p < 0.001). The acceptability of DuraNet and Olyset after short-term use was not significantly different at the 5% level. LLINs that were perceived not to prevent mosquito bites were significantly less acceptable than LLINs that were perceived to prevent mosquito bites (OR 0.15; 95%CI 0.03 to 0.6). LLINs that allow a pleasant night's sleep (OR 6.3; 95%CI:3.3-12.3) and have a soft texture (OR 5.7; 95%CI:1.9-20.5) were considered more acceptable than those that did not. Olyset's acceptability decreased over time and this was due to net wrinkling/shrinkage after washing resulting in reduced efficiency in preventing mosquito bites. The increase in DuraNet acceptability was a result of a reduction in minor adverse events following longer-term use.

CONCLUSION

This research was conducted to inform LLIN procurement as part of the national malaria control and elimination programme in SI. The success of malaria elimination in the Pacific and elsewhere relies on provision of acceptable interventions, consideration of local-level realities and engagement of communities in strategy development.

TRIAL REGISTRATIONS

Clinical trials ACTRN12608000322336.

摘要

背景

在所罗门群岛(SI),消除疟疾策略的一个关键组成部分是广泛覆盖长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)。该策略的成功取决于 LLIN 的可接受性和合规性。政策制定者和捐助者之间一直存在未解决的争论,即哪种类型的 LLIN 最适合在 SI 大规模分发,并且有传闻称某些品牌的 LLIN 不受欢迎。因此,2008 年 7 月至 9 月进行了一项关于 LLIN 可接受性和偏好的集群随机对照交叉蚊帐接受和偏好试验,以提供政策信息,并促进社区参与和选择最适合 SI 使用的 LLIN。

方法

采用三阶段抽样法从 SI 的马莱塔省随机选择研究人群。本研究评估了三种品牌的 LLIN:Olyset、PermaNet 和 DuraNet。在每个 LLIN 的短期和长期试验后,通过三个定义的时间点进行蚊帐可接受性和偏好评估。

结果

PermaNet 在短期使用后的可接受性(96.5%)明显大于 Olyset(67.3%,p < 0.001)和 DuraNet(69.8%,p < 0.001)。短期使用后,DuraNet 和 Olyset 的可接受性在 5%水平上没有显著差异。被认为不能防止蚊虫叮咬的蚊帐明显不如被认为能防止蚊虫叮咬的蚊帐更受欢迎(OR 0.15;95%CI 0.03 至 0.6)。能让人睡个好觉(OR 6.3;95%CI:3.3-12.3)和质地柔软(OR 5.7;95%CI:1.9-20.5)的蚊帐比没有这些特性的蚊帐更受欢迎。Olyset 的可接受性随时间下降,这是由于洗涤后网眼起皱/收缩导致防蚊效率降低所致。DuraNet 可接受性的增加是由于长期使用后轻微不良事件减少所致。

结论

这项研究是为了为 LLIN 采购提供信息,作为 SI 国家疟疾控制和消除规划的一部分。太平洋地区和其他地区消除疟疾的成功依赖于提供可接受的干预措施、考虑当地实际情况以及让社区参与战略制定。

试验注册

临床试验 ACTRN12608000322336。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验