BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007 Dec 12;1(3):e100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000100.
Prior to a community-based efficacy trial of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) in the prevention of visceral leishmaniasis (VL; also called kala-azar), a pilot study on preference of tools was held in endemic areas of India and Nepal in September 2005.LLINs made of polyester and polyethylene were distributed to 60 participants, who used the nets sequentially for 7 d. Acceptability and preference were evaluated via indirect indicators through questionnaires at three defined time points before and after use of the LLINs and through focus group discussions (FGDs). In the latter, preferences for color and size were also assessed. Untreated bed nets were owned by 87% of the households prior to the study. All users liked textures of both LLIN types after 7 d of use, but had a slight preference for those made of polyester if they were to recommend a LLIN to relatives or friends (p<0.05), mainly because of their relatively greater softness in comparison to polyethylene LLINs. Users reported that both net types reduced mosquito bites and number of insects, including sand fly (bhusana; genus Phlebotomus), inside the house. Side effects were minor and disappeared quickly.The large-scale intervention trial considered the preferences of the study population to decide on the best tool of intervention--light-blue, rectangular, polyester LLINs of different sizes.
在长效杀虫蚊帐(LLINs)预防内脏利什曼病(VL;也称为黑热病)的基于社区的疗效试验之前,2005 年 9 月在印度和尼泊尔的流行地区进行了一项关于工具偏好的试点研究。聚酯和聚乙烯制成的 LLINs 分发给 60 名参与者,他们连续使用 7 天。通过在使用 LLINs 前后的三个特定时间点通过问卷调查和焦点小组讨论(FGDs),以间接指标评估可接受性和偏好。在后者中,还评估了对颜色和大小的偏好。在研究之前,87%的家庭拥有未处理的蚊帐。所有使用者在使用 7 天后都喜欢两种 LLIN 类型的质地,但如果要向亲戚或朋友推荐 LLIN,则对聚酯 LLIN 略有偏好(p<0.05),主要是因为它们相对较软,与聚乙烯 LLIN 相比。使用者报告说,这两种蚊帐类型都减少了蚊子叮咬和室内昆虫的数量,包括沙蝇(bhusana;属 Phlebotomus)。副作用较小,很快就消失了。大规模干预试验考虑了研究人群的偏好,以决定最佳干预工具——浅蓝色、长方形、不同尺寸的聚酯 LLINs。