• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波碎石术时递增电压与固定电压治疗对结石粉碎和肾损伤的影响:一项前瞻性随机试验。

Effect of escalating versus fixed voltage treatment on stone comminution and renal injury during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.025. Epub 2009 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.025
PMID:20018316
Abstract

PURPOSE

ESWL is a minimally invasive, efficacious therapy for most renal stones. However, an optimal voltage treatment protocol ensuring effective stone comminution while minimizing tissue injury is not well established. We performed a prospective, randomized trial of the stone-free rate and renoprotective effect of an escalating vs a fixed voltage treatment strategy during ESWL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2006 and June 2008 we enrolled 45 patients undergoing ESWL for a renal stone in this institutional review board approved trial. A Dornier DoLi 50 lithotriptor was used. Patients were randomized to receive the escalating strategy of 500 shocks at 14k V, 1,000 at 16 kV and 1,000 at 18 kV or the fixed strategy of 2,500 shocks at 18 kV. Abdominal x-ray was done to determine the stone-free rate at 1 month. Voided urine was analyzed for beta2-microglobulin and microalbumin before, immediately after and 1 week after ESWL to evaluate renal damage.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 48 years. Median stone size was 8 mm. Of patients in the escalating group 81% were stone-free vs 48% in the fixed group (p <0.03). There was a significant difference between microalbumin and beta2-microglobulin 1 week after the procedure (p = 0.046 vs 0.045). There was trend toward a difference in microalbumin and beta2-microglobulin immediately after the procedure (p = 0.17 and 0.25, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, randomized study shows that an escalating voltage treatment strategy produces better stone comminution than a fixed strategy. The study suggests that there may be a protective effect against damage caused by ESWL with an escalating treatment strategy.

摘要

目的

ESWL 是一种微创、有效的治疗大多数肾结石的方法。然而,一种确保有效碎石而最小化组织损伤的最佳电压治疗方案尚未得到很好的建立。我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机试验,比较了递增电压与固定电压治疗策略在 ESWL 中对无结石率和肾脏保护作用的影响。

材料和方法

在 2006 年 2 月至 2008 年 6 月期间,我们在这项机构审查委员会批准的试验中招募了 45 名接受 ESWL 治疗肾结石的患者。使用 Dornier DoLi 50 碎石机。患者被随机分配接受递增策略(500 次冲击,电压 14kV;1000 次冲击,电压 16kV;1000 次冲击,电压 18kV)或固定策略(2500 次冲击,电压 18kV)。腹部 X 线检查在 1 个月时确定无结石率。在 ESWL 前、后即刻和 1 周时分析尿液中的β2-微球蛋白和微量白蛋白,以评估肾脏损伤。

结果

患者中位年龄为 48 岁,中位结石大小为 8mm。递增组 81%的患者无结石,而固定组为 48%(p<0.03)。术后 1 周时,微白蛋白和β2-微球蛋白之间存在显著差异(p=0.046 对 0.045)。术后即刻时,微白蛋白和β2-微球蛋白之间也存在差异趋势(分别为 p=0.17 和 0.25)。

结论

这项前瞻性、随机研究表明,递增电压治疗策略比固定策略产生更好的碎石效果。该研究表明,递增治疗策略可能对 ESWL 引起的损伤有保护作用。

相似文献

1
Effect of escalating versus fixed voltage treatment on stone comminution and renal injury during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial.体外冲击波碎石术时递增电压与固定电压治疗对结石粉碎和肾损伤的影响:一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.025. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
2
The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy.治疗策略对冲击波碎石术中结石粉碎效率的影响。
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):349-54. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132356.97888.8b.
3
Can Phyllanthus niruri affect the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones? A randomized, prospective, long-term study.叶下珠会影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的疗效吗?一项随机、前瞻性长期研究。
J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1020-2. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.010.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi.肾结石的体外冲击波碎石术
J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4 Suppl):1824-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.03.018. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
5
Variation in clinical outcome following shock wave lithotripsy.冲击波碎石术后临床结果的差异。
J Urol. 2000 Mar;163(3):721-5.
6
Does a slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones?治疗速度较慢会影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立肾或输尿管结石的疗效吗?
J Urol. 2006 Apr;175(4):1370-3; discussion 1373-4. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00683-X.
7
Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones--a multivariate analysis model.肾结石体外冲击波碎石术后成功率的预测——一种多变量分析模型
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38(2):161-7. doi: 10.1080/00365590310022626.
8
Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi.频率重要吗?一项关于肾结石冲击波碎石术每分钟60次与120次电击的随机对照试验结果。
J Urol. 2006 Nov;176(5):2055-8; discussion 2058. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.012.
9
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prepubertal children: 22-year experience at a single institution with a single lithotriptor.青春期前儿童的体外冲击波碎石术:一家机构使用单一碎石机的22年经验。
J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4 Suppl):1835-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.04.084. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
10
Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial.每分钟60次或120次冲击波碎石术:一项随机双盲试验。
J Urol. 2005 Aug;174(2):595-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000165156.90011.95.

引用本文的文献

1
Modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity Scoring System for Predicting Stone-Free Status After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.用于预测体外冲击波碎石术后结石清除状态的改良首尔国立大学肾结石复杂性评分系统。
Res Rep Urol. 2025 Aug 8;17:279-286. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S534829. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk factors of hematoma after SWL for renal calculi: analysis from RCTs and a literature review.肾结石体外冲击波碎石术后血肿的危险因素:随机对照试验分析及文献综述
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Feb;57(2):323-332. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04205-3. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
3
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version.
加拿大泌尿外科协会指南:输尿管结石的管理——缩略版
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Dec;15(12):383-393. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7652.
4
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Full-text.加拿大泌尿外科协会指南:输尿管结石的管理 - 全文
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Dec;15(12):E676-E690. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7581.
5
Predictors of success following extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in a contemporary cohort.当代队列中体外冲击波碎石术后成功的预测因素。
Urol Ann. 2021 Jul-Sep;13(3):282-287. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_155_19. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
6
Automated Generation of Personalized Shock Wave Lithotripsy Protocols: Treatment Planning Using Deep Learning.个性化冲击波碎石术方案的自动生成:使用深度学习的治疗规划
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 May 11;9(5):e24721. doi: 10.2196/24721.
7
Renal Protection Phenomenon Observed in a Porcine Model After Electromagnetic Lithotripsy Using a Treatment Pause.电磁碎石术中采用治疗暂停观察到的猪模型中的肾脏保护现象。
J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):682-686. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0681. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
Energy output modalities of shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of urinary stones: escalating or fixed voltage? A systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石的能量输出模式:递增电压还是固定电压?系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2443-2453. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03049-2. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
9
Optimisation of shock wave lithotripsy: a systematic review of technical aspects to improve outcomes.冲击波碎石术的优化:对改善治疗效果的技术方面的系统评价
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 4):S389-S397. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.06.07.
10
Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes.冲击波碎石术的适应症、禁忌症及如何改善治疗效果。
Asian J Urol. 2018 Oct;5(4):256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Sep 4.