Suppr超能文献

肾结石体外冲击波碎石术后血肿的危险因素:随机对照试验分析及文献综述

Risk factors of hematoma after SWL for renal calculi: analysis from RCTs and a literature review.

作者信息

Wong Chris Ho-Ming, Ko Ivan Ching-Ho, Tang Emmy Sui-Fan, Yuen Steffi Kar-Kei, Leung David Ka-Wai, Kong Angel Wing-Yan, Chiu Peter Ka-Fung, Teoh Jeremy Yuen-Chun, Ng Chi Fai

机构信息

Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Clinical Sciences Building, Prince of Wales, Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR.

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Feb;57(2):323-332. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04205-3. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors of perinephric hematoma following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for renal calculi through combined analysis of two randomized controlled trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This post-hoc analysis included adult patients with solitary renal calculi ranging from 5 to 15 mm, treated with SWL between 2016 and 2022. All patients received cross-sectional imaging (either non-contrast computer tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging) two days post-SWL to assess the presence and severity of perinephric hematoma.

RESULTS

Among 573 patients analyzed, 173 (30.9%) developed perinephric hematoma by Day 2 post-SWL. Multivariate logistic regression identified higher total energy delivered (odds ratio [OR] = 1.533, p = 0.003), higher mean stone density (OR = 2.603, p = 0.01), higher maximal stone density (OR = 3.578, p = 0.03), and lower pole stone location (OR = 1.545, p = 0.029) were risk factors for the development of hematoma. Conversely, the stepwise ramping protocol was a protective factor for hematoma formation. (OR = 0.572, p = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

This study elucidates key factors influencing the risk of perinephric hematoma post-SWL, highlighting the importance of procedural adjustments such as the stepwise ramping protocol to reduce complications. These insights call for targeted patient and treatment strategy optimization to enhance SWL safety and efficacy.

摘要

目的

通过对两项随机对照试验的综合分析,确定体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗肾结石后肾周血肿的危险因素。

患者和方法

这项事后分析纳入了2016年至2022年间接受SWL治疗的5至15毫米孤立性肾结石成年患者。所有患者在SWL术后两天接受横断面成像(非增强计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像),以评估肾周血肿的存在和严重程度。

结果

在分析的573例患者中,173例(30.9%)在SWL术后第2天出现肾周血肿。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,较高的总能量输送量(比值比[OR]=1.533,p=0.003)、较高的平均结石密度(OR=2.603,p=0.01)、较高的最大结石密度(OR=3.578,p=0.03)以及结石位于下极(OR=1.545,p=0.029)是血肿形成的危险因素。相反,逐步递增方案是血肿形成的保护因素(OR=0.572,p=0.042)。

结论

本研究阐明了影响SWL术后肾周血肿风险的关键因素,强调了如逐步递增方案等程序调整对减少并发症的重要性。这些见解呼吁优化针对性的患者和治疗策略,以提高SWL的安全性和有效性。

相似文献

7
Hepatic haematoma after shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.肾结石冲击波碎石术后肝血肿
Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):785-9. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0492-0. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验