University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.09.083. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
We compared urinary incontinence severity measures and the impact of stress urinary incontinence in normal, overweight and obese women.
Baseline characteristics of subjects in the SISTEr (655) and the TOMUS (597) were analyzed. Body mass index was defined as normal (less than 25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25 to less than 30 kg/m(2)) and obese (30 kg/m(2) or greater). Independent urinary incontinence severity measures included a 3-day diary including incontinence episode frequency, Urogenital Distress Inventory scores and Valsalva leak point pressure from urodynamic testing. Impact was measured using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Multivariable regression models were fit for each severity measure (Urogenital Distress Inventory, incontinence episode frequency, Valsalva leak point pressure and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire) on weight category. Covariates included age, race, diabetes and variables significantly associated with body mass index on bivariate analysis.
Mean age (SD) of participants was 51.9 (10.3) in SISTEr and 52.9 (11.0) in TOMUS. In each trial 45% of subjects were obese. In SISTEr multivariable regression analyses showed that higher weight category was independently associated with higher mean Urogenital Distress Inventory score (p = 0.003), incontinence episode frequency (p <0.0001), Valsalva leak point pressure (p = 0.003) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire score (p = 0.0004). In TOMUS higher weight category was not associated with Urogenital Distress Inventory score (p = 0.24) but was associated with higher incontinence episode frequency (p = 0.0003), Valsalva leak point pressure (p = 0.0006) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire score (p <0.0001).
Obese women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence report more incontinence episodes, more symptom distress and worse quality of life despite better measure of urethral function (higher Valsalva leak point pressure) on urodynamics.
我们比较了正常、超重和肥胖女性的尿失禁严重程度指标和压力性尿失禁的影响。
分析了 SISTEr(655 例)和 TOMUS(597 例)受试者的基线特征。体重指数定义为正常(<25kg/m²)、超重(25-<30kg/m²)和肥胖(≥30kg/m²)。独立的尿失禁严重程度指标包括 3 天的日记,包括失禁发作频率、尿生殖窘迫量表评分和尿动力学检查的valsalva 漏点压力。采用尿失禁影响问卷(incontinence impact questionnaire)测量影响。在体重类别上,对每个严重程度指标(尿生殖窘迫量表、失禁发作频率、valsalva 漏点压力和尿失禁影响问卷)进行多变量回归模型拟合。协变量包括年龄、种族、糖尿病和在单变量分析中与体重指数显著相关的变量。
SISTEr 中的参与者平均年龄(标准差)为 51.9(10.3),TOMUS 为 52.9(11.0)。在每个试验中,45%的受试者肥胖。在 SISTEr 中,多变量回归分析显示,较高的体重类别与较高的平均尿生殖窘迫量表评分(p=0.003)、失禁发作频率(p<0.0001)、valsalva 漏点压力(p=0.003)和尿失禁影响问卷评分(p=0.0004)独立相关。在 TOMUS 中,较高的体重类别与尿生殖窘迫量表评分无关(p=0.24),但与更高的失禁发作频率(p=0.0003)、valsalva 漏点压力(p=0.0006)和尿失禁影响问卷评分(p<0.0001)相关。
尽管尿动力学检查显示尿道功能较好(较高的valsalva 漏点压力),但接受压力性尿失禁手术的肥胖女性报告的失禁发作次数更多、症状困扰更多、生活质量更差。