Suppr超能文献

肝离断采用 Kelly 冲洗与超声刀技术融合。

Fusion technique for liver transection with Kelly-clysis and harmonic technology.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Bandra Reclamation, Bandra (West), Mumbai, India.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2010 Jan;34(1):101-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0282-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various devices are available for liver transection and comparative data on transection techniques are limited by the diversity of operative procedures. Clamp crushing (Kelly-clysis) with a Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA-Integra Radionics) is widely used for splitting the liver parenchyma. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar coagulation, ligatures, or hemoclips. We introduce a fusion technique (Focus-clysis) for liver transection using a combination of Kelly-clysis and harmonic technology.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A fusion technique (FT) was performed using FOCUS, a Kelly clamp like instrument attached to a Harmonic generator. Hepatic resections (nine major, nine minor) were performed with the fusion technique in 18 non-cirrhotic patients. Variables evaluated were blood loss, transection time, biliary leak, postoperative liver function, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness. The results were compared with 18 hepatic resections (nine major, nine minor) that were performed with our earlier technique, i.e., CUSA with bipolar cautery, ligatures, and hemoclips.

RESULTS

The mean blood loss was 416 ml in the FT group, compared to 833 ml in the CUSA group. Two patients in the FT group needed blood transfusion in the first 48 h, whereas eight patients in the CUSA group had transfusions. No major postoperative liver dysfunction was noted with the new technique, and postoperative morbidity was lower in the FT group. Liver transection with the fusion technique was faster.

CONCLUSION

The fusion technique (Focus-clysis) using Kelly-clysis and harmonic technology is promising, easy, and effective for liver transection. Our initial results show advantages over the routinely used CUSA/bipolar combination. The fusion technique could be a new option for liver transection, especially in non-cirrhotic patients.

摘要

背景

有多种设备可用于肝切除术,由于手术操作的多样性,关于肝切除术技术的比较数据有限。使用 Cavitron 超声外科吸引器(CUSA-Integra Radionics)的夹压粉碎(凯利冲洗法)被广泛用于分割肝实质。止血是通过双极电凝、结扎或血管夹完成的。我们介绍了一种融合技术(Focus-clysis),用于使用凯利冲洗法和高频电刀技术的肝切除术。

材料和方法

融合技术(FT)是使用一种类似于凯利钳的 FOCUS 器械与高频电刀发生器结合完成的。在 18 例非肝硬化患者中,使用融合技术进行了 9 例大肝切除术和 9 例小肝切除术。评估的变量包括出血量、肝切除术时间、胆漏、术后肝功能、发病率和成本效益。结果与我们早期技术(CUSA 联合双极电凝、结扎和血管夹)进行的 18 例肝切除术(9 例大肝切除术和 9 例小肝切除术)进行了比较。

结果

FT 组的平均出血量为 416ml,而 CUSA 组为 833ml。FT 组有 2 例患者在术后 48 小时内需要输血,而 CUSA 组有 8 例患者需要输血。新术式未出现明显的术后肝功能不全,FT 组术后发病率较低。使用融合技术进行肝切除术更快。

结论

使用凯利冲洗法和高频电刀技术的融合技术(Focus-clysis)用于肝切除术是有前途的、简单的和有效的。我们的初步结果显示,与常规使用的 CUSA/双极联合相比具有优势。融合技术可能是肝切除术的一种新选择,特别是在非肝硬化患者中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验