Okada K, Shirasaki N, Hayashi H, Oka S, Hosoya T
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kagawa Medical School, Japan.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Mar;73(3):352-64.
Thirty-seven patients who had enlargement of the spinal canal anteriorly and stabilization of the spine for cervical spondylotic myelopathy were followed for an average of forty-nine months (range, twenty-eight to seventy months). Myelography and computed tomographic myelography were performed preoperatively on all patients to determine the location and features of the areas of decompression. The canal was enlarged by discectomy; by subtotal corpectomy and removal of the anteromedial parts of the pedicles; or by removal of osteophytes or of the posterior longitudinal ligament, or both. Partial corpectomy and interbody arthrodesis was performed in nine patients; subtotal corpectomy, including removal of the posterior parts of the vertebral bodies and of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and strut bone-grafting, in fifteen patients; and subtotal corpectomy, with detachment of the remaining thin posterior parts of the vertebral bodies and of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and strut bone-grafting, in thirteen patients. Postoperatively, radiographic examinations, including myelography and computed tomographic myelography, were performed for thirty-six patients and magnetic resonance imaging, for twenty-eight. A satisfactory neurological result was obtained in twenty-nine patients. Atrophy of the spinal cord, as seen on preoperative computed-tomographic myelograms, was predictive of an unsatisfactory result of the decompression, as was weakness of the peroneal muscles. All but one of the thirty-seven patients had improved walking ability at the most recent follow-up examination: seventeen patients improved by 1 point; fourteen, by 2 points; four, by 3 points; and one, by 4 points. The remaining patient reverted to the preoperative status after an initial improvement. The ability to walk at the interim examinations was compared with that at the most recent examination; three patients had continuing improvement, while three others had deterioration. The main cause of deterioration was new spondylotic changes associated with stenosis of the spinal canal, occurring at the level of the disc just cephalad to the fused levels. We concluded that anterior decompression followed by a secure arthrodesis should be an extensive procedure for patients who have cervical spondylotic myelopathy, as determined preoperatively from a myelogram or computed tomographic myelogram. Excision of the vertebral bodies should also be wide and should include the anteromedial parts of the pedicles. The third or fourth cervical vertebra should be included in the arthrodesis prophylactically in patients who have stenosis of the spinal canal when either of these vertebrae is adjacent to the level of fusion.
37例因脊髓型颈椎病而行前路椎管扩大及脊柱稳定术的患者,平均随访49个月(范围28至70个月)。所有患者术前均行脊髓造影和计算机断层脊髓造影,以确定减压区域的位置和特征。通过椎间盘切除术、椎体次全切除并切除椎弓根的前内侧部分、或切除骨赘或后纵韧带(或两者)来扩大椎管。9例患者行部分椎体切除及椎间融合术;15例患者行椎体次全切除,包括切除椎体后部和后纵韧带,并植入支撑骨块;13例患者行椎体次全切除,同时分离椎体剩余的薄后部和后纵韧带,并植入支撑骨块。术后,36例患者行包括脊髓造影和计算机断层脊髓造影在内的影像学检查,28例患者行磁共振成像检查。29例患者获得了满意的神经功能结果。术前计算机断层脊髓造影显示的脊髓萎缩以及腓骨肌无力,提示减压效果不佳。37例患者中除1例之外,其余患者在最近一次随访检查时步行能力均有改善:17例患者改善1分;14例患者改善2分;4例患者改善3分;1例患者改善4分。其余1例患者在最初改善后又恢复到术前状态。将中期检查时的步行能力与最近一次检查时的进行比较;3例患者持续改善,3例患者恶化。恶化的主要原因是与椎管狭窄相关的新的颈椎病性改变,发生在融合节段上方椎间盘水平。我们得出结论,对于术前通过脊髓造影或计算机断层脊髓造影确诊为脊髓型颈椎病的患者,前路减压并牢固融合应是一种广泛应用的手术方式。椎体切除范围也应广泛,应包括椎弓根的前内侧部分。当第三或第四颈椎与融合节段相邻且存在椎管狭窄时,应预防性地将其纳入融合节段。