Kendall P C, Lipman A J
Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):78-87. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.1.78.
Psychological and pharmacological comparative outcome studies are reviewed, typically using select examples of cognitive-behavioral interventions from among the psychological therapies and of depression from among the disorders. Special attention is given to methodological considerations such as selecting outcome measures, calibrating the quality of therapy, and investigating client and therapist characteristics and the therapeutic relationship. Discussion includes consideration of various modes of comparison (i.e., quickness of action, side effects, relapse, compliance, cost-effectiveness) that may be used in comparative outcome studies. A disorder-specific approach to comparative outcome research is seen as a necessary step in the progress toward an increasingly sophisticated discrimination of distinctive, complementary, and interactive therapeutic processes.
对心理和药物治疗的比较结果研究进行了综述,通常采用心理治疗中的认知行为干预以及疾病中的抑郁症等精选实例。特别关注方法学方面的考虑因素,如选择结果测量指标、校准治疗质量、调查客户和治疗师的特征以及治疗关系。讨论内容包括对比较结果研究中可能使用的各种比较模式(即起效速度、副作用、复发、依从性、成本效益)的考量。针对特定疾病的比较结果研究方法被视为朝着日益精细地区分独特、互补和相互作用的治疗过程迈进的必要一步。