• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父母的选择:67 个前工业化社会中父母对女婿和儿媳的期望

Parental choice: what parents want in a son-in-law and a daughter-in-law across 67 pre-industrial societies.

机构信息

Department of Social Sciences, University of Nicosia, Cyprus.

出版信息

Br J Psychol. 2010 Nov;101(Pt 4):695-704. doi: 10.1348/000712609X480634. Epub 2009 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1348/000712609X480634
PMID:20021710
Abstract

Parents are influential over mate choice, and in most human societies they choose spouses for their offspring according to their own preferences. However, surprising little is known about the qualities which make a woman desirable as a daughter-in-law and a man desirable as a son-in-law. Using evidence from 67 societies such traits are identified and three hypotheses are tested: first, the hypothesis is tested that parents desire in an in-law qualities which are beneficial to them and their kin. Second, it is hypothesized that such preferences are contingent upon the sex of the in-law, as traits are weighted differently in a daughter-in-law and in a son-in-law. The third hypothesis tested is that parental preferences vary according to the subsistence type of a given society, as traits are valued differently in agropastoral societies and foraging societies. The evidence presented here provides support for all three hypotheses.

摘要

父母对配偶选择有影响力,在大多数人类社会中,他们会根据自己的喜好为子女选择配偶。然而,关于女性作为儿媳和男性作为女婿受欢迎的原因,人们知之甚少。本研究利用来自 67 个社会的证据,确定了这些特质,并检验了三个假设:首先,检验了父母希望姻亲具有对他们及其亲属有益的特质的假设。其次,假设这种偏好取决于姻亲的性别,因为在儿媳和女婿中,特质的权重不同。检验的第三个假设是,父母的偏好因特定社会的生计类型而异,因为在农牧社会和狩猎采集社会中,特质的价值不同。本文提供的证据支持这三个假设。

相似文献

1
Parental choice: what parents want in a son-in-law and a daughter-in-law across 67 pre-industrial societies.父母的选择:67 个前工业化社会中父母对女婿和儿媳的期望
Br J Psychol. 2010 Nov;101(Pt 4):695-704. doi: 10.1348/000712609X480634. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
2
Parental choice: exploring in-law preferences and their contingencies in the Greek-Cypriot culture.父母的选择:探索希族塞浦路斯文化中的姻亲偏好及其偶然性
Evol Psychol. 2014 Jan 30;12(1):54-72. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200105.
3
In-Law Preferences in China and in Cyprus: Differences and Similarities.中国和塞浦路斯的姻亲偏好:差异与相似之处
Evol Psychol. 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):1474704917725303. doi: 10.1177/1474704917725303.
4
In-Law and Mate Preferences in Chinese Society and the Role of Traditional Cultural Values.中国社会中的姻亲与配偶偏好及传统文化价值观的作用
Evol Psychol. 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):1474704917730518. doi: 10.1177/1474704917730518.
5
Conflicting preferences of parents and offspring over criteria for a mate: a study in Argentina.父母和子女对配偶标准的冲突偏好:阿根廷的一项研究。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Aug;24(4):391-9. doi: 10.1037/a0020252.
6
Parent-offspring conflict over mating: testing the tradeoffs hypothesis.亲子在交配方面的冲突:检验权衡假说
Evol Psychol. 2011 Oct 4;9(4):470-95. doi: 10.1177/147470491100900401.
7
In-Law Preferences for Similarity: Comparing Parent and Child Preferences for In-Law/Intimate Partner Similarity.姻亲相似偏好:比较父母和子女对姻亲/亲密伴侣相似性的偏好。
Evol Psychol. 2024 Jan-Mar;22(1):14747049241234291. doi: 10.1177/14747049241234291.
8
In-Law Preferences in China: What Parents Look for in the Parents of Their Children's Mates.中国的姻亲偏好:父母对子女配偶父母的期望
Evol Psychol. 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):1474704917723913. doi: 10.1177/1474704917723913.
9
Parent-offspring conflict over mate choice: An experimental study in China.亲代-子代冲突中的配偶选择:中国的一项实验研究。
Br J Psychol. 2018 Nov;109(4):674-693. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12319. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
10
Sex preference and fertility in Peninsular Malaysia.马来西亚半岛的性别偏好与生育情况
Stud Fam Plann. 1994 May-Jun;25(3):137-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Discrepancies in Mate Preferences among Chinese Families between Fathers, Mothers, and Children: A Latent Profile Analysis.中国家庭中父亲、母亲和孩子在配偶偏好上的差异:潜在剖面分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Aug;53(8):3239-3254. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02926-1. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
2
In-Law Preferences for Similarity: Comparing Parent and Child Preferences for In-Law/Intimate Partner Similarity.姻亲相似偏好:比较父母和子女对姻亲/亲密伴侣相似性的偏好。
Evol Psychol. 2024 Jan-Mar;22(1):14747049241234291. doi: 10.1177/14747049241234291.
3
Does Nubility Indicate More Than High Reproductive Value? Nubile Primiparas' Pregnancy Outcomes in Evolutionary Perspective.
青春期是否意味着更高的生殖价值?从进化角度看生育旺盛期初产妇的妊娠结局。
Evol Psychol. 2021 Jul-Sep;19(3):14747049211039506. doi: 10.1177/14747049211039506.
4
Our Grandmothers' Legacy: Challenges Faced by Female Ancestors Leave Traces in Modern Women's Same-Sex Relationships.我们祖母的遗产:女性祖先所面临的挑战在现代女性的同性关系中留下痕迹。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Oct;51(7):3225-3256. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01768-x. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
In-Law and Mate Preferences in Chinese Society and the Role of Traditional Cultural Values.中国社会中的姻亲与配偶偏好及传统文化价值观的作用
Evol Psychol. 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):1474704917730518. doi: 10.1177/1474704917730518.
6
In-Law Preferences in China and in Cyprus: Differences and Similarities.中国和塞浦路斯的姻亲偏好:差异与相似之处
Evol Psychol. 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):1474704917725303. doi: 10.1177/1474704917725303.
7
Free mate choice does not influence reproductive success in humans.自由交配并不影响人类的生殖成功。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 31;7(1):10127. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10484-x.
8
In-Law Preferences in China: What Parents Look for in the Parents of Their Children's Mates.中国的姻亲偏好:父母对子女配偶父母的期望
Evol Psychol. 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):1474704917723913. doi: 10.1177/1474704917723913.
9
Fitness consequences of spousal relatedness in 46 small-scale societies.46个小规模社会中配偶亲缘关系的健康影响
Biol Lett. 2014 May;10(5):20140160. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0160.
10
Parental choice: exploring in-law preferences and their contingencies in the Greek-Cypriot culture.父母的选择:探索希族塞浦路斯文化中的姻亲偏好及其偶然性
Evol Psychol. 2014 Jan 30;12(1):54-72. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200105.