Preference for conditioned reinforcement.
作者信息
Williams B A, Dunn R
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0109.
出版信息
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):37-46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-37.
Abstract
Pigeons were presented with a concurrent-chains schedule in which both choice alternatives led to the same terminal-link stimulus, which was followed by food. Superimposed on the food-reinforced presentations of the terminal-link stimulus was a second schedule of presentations of the same stimulus that were followed by no food. The absolute number of these no-food stimulus presentations was held constant while their relative frequency assigned to one or the other choice alternative was systematically varied. Preference for a given choice alternative tracked the relative frequency of these stimulus presentations, thus demonstrating that they served as reinforcers. These results resolve conflicts in the literature regarding the effect of conditioned reinforcement on choice.
摘要
相似文献
1
Preference for conditioned reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):37-46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-37.
2
Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):155-75. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-155.
3
Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Sep;56(2):277-88. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-277.
4
Devaluation of stimuli contingent on choice: evidence for conditioned reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):117-31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-117.
5
Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):201-18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-201.
6
Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Mar;93(2):147-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-147.
7
Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):359-79. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-359.
8
Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jan;47(1):57-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-57.
9
Conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules when time to reinforcement is held constant.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Mar;99(2):179-88. doi: 10.1002/jeab.10. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
10
Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):219-34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-219.
引用本文的文献
1
Leveraging individual differences in cue-reward learning to investigate the psychological and neural basis of shared psychiatric symptomatology: The sign-tracker/goal-tracker model.
Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug;138(4):260-271. doi: 10.1037/bne0000590. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
Selective chemogenetic inactivation of corticoaccumbal projections disrupts trait choice impulsivity.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023 Nov;48(12):1821-1831. doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01604-5. Epub 2023 May 19.
3
Suboptimal choice in rats: Incentive salience attribution promotes maladaptive decision-making.
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 1;320:244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
4
Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159336. eCollection 2016.
5
Conditioned reinforcement: Neglected or outmoded explanatory construct?
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):457-75. doi: 10.3758/BF03210950.
6
Serial discrimination reversal learning in pigeons as a function of signal properties during the delay of reinforcement.
Learn Behav. 2013 Sep;41(3):238-55. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0100-8.
7
Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Mar;93(2):269-89. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-269.
8
Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Mar;93(2):147-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-147.
9
Some effects of procedural variations on choice responding in concurrent chains.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Nov;92(3):345-65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-345.
10
Contributions of the orbitofrontal cortex to impulsive choice: interactions with basal levels of impulsivity, dopamine signalling, and reward-related cues.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Jul;211(1):87-98. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1871-2. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
本文引用的文献
1
Choice: A local analysis.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):383-405. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-383.
2
Choice: Some quantitative relations.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jul;40(1):1-13. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-1.
3
Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):217-32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-217.
4
Unsignalled delay of reinforcement in variable-interval schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):169-75. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-169.
5
Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jan;29(1):77-86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-77.
6
The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):441-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-441.
7
A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):27-38. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-27.
8
Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4(3):267-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267.
9
Effects of required rates of responding upon choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):15-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-15.
10
Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):341-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-341.
Zotero 插件