• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Preference for conditioned reinforcement.对条件强化的偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):37-46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-37.
2
Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.条件强化值与选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):155-75. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-155.
3
Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine.作为条件性强化物的食物配对刺激:右旋苯丙胺的作用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Sep;56(2):277-88. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-277.
4
Devaluation of stimuli contingent on choice: evidence for conditioned reinforcement.基于选择的刺激贬值:条件性强化的证据。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):117-31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-117.
5
Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.具有不确定结果的选择:条件强化效应
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):201-18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-201.
6
Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.双重作用于条件强化频率和条件强化值的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Mar;93(2):147-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-147.
7
Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?替代性强化增强对改变的抵抗力:巴甫洛夫式或操作性条件作用?
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):359-79. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-359.
8
Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.在可靠和不可靠结果之间进行选择:并发链中的混合百分比强化
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jan;47(1):57-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-57.
9
Conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules when time to reinforcement is held constant.在强化时间保持不变的情况下,链型时间表中的条件强化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Mar;99(2):179-88. doi: 10.1002/jeab.10. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
10
Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.百分比强化程序中的次优选择:信号条件和终段长度的影响
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):219-34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-219.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging individual differences in cue-reward learning to investigate the psychological and neural basis of shared psychiatric symptomatology: The sign-tracker/goal-tracker model.利用线索-奖励学习中的个体差异来探究共享精神症状的心理和神经基础:信号追踪者/目标追踪者模型。
Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug;138(4):260-271. doi: 10.1037/bne0000590. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
Selective chemogenetic inactivation of corticoaccumbal projections disrupts trait choice impulsivity.选择性化学遗传学失活皮质 - 伏隔核投射可破坏特质冲动选择。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023 Nov;48(12):1821-1831. doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01604-5. Epub 2023 May 19.
3
Suboptimal choice in rats: Incentive salience attribution promotes maladaptive decision-making.大鼠的次优选择:动机显著性归因促进适应不良的决策。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 1;320:244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
4
Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.鸽子的次优选择:刺激值预测对频率的选择。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159336. eCollection 2016.
5
Conditioned reinforcement: Neglected or outmoded explanatory construct?条件强化:被忽视或过时的解释性概念?
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):457-75. doi: 10.3758/BF03210950.
6
Serial discrimination reversal learning in pigeons as a function of signal properties during the delay of reinforcement.鸽子的序列辨别逆转学习作为强化延迟期间信号特性的函数。
Learn Behav. 2013 Sep;41(3):238-55. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0100-8.
7
Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.条件强化和反应强度。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Mar;93(2):269-89. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-269.
8
Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.双重作用于条件强化频率和条件强化值的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Mar;93(2):147-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-147.
9
Some effects of procedural variations on choice responding in concurrent chains.程序变化对同时链中选择反应的一些影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Nov;92(3):345-65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-345.
10
Contributions of the orbitofrontal cortex to impulsive choice: interactions with basal levels of impulsivity, dopamine signalling, and reward-related cues.眶额皮层对冲动选择的贡献:与冲动水平、多巴胺信号和与奖励相关的线索的相互作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Jul;211(1):87-98. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1871-2. Epub 2010 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Choice: A local analysis.选择:局部分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):383-405. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-383.
2
Choice: Some quantitative relations.选择:一些定量关系。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jul;40(1):1-13. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-1.
3
Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.激励理论:二、选择模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):217-32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-217.
4
Unsignalled delay of reinforcement in variable-interval schedules.不定时距强化中的无信号延迟。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):169-75. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-169.
5
Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement.强化时距选择和条件强化的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jan;29(1):77-86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-77.
6
The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement.未信号延迟强化的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):441-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-441.
7
A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules.简单同时性和同时性链日程中的选择模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):27-38. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-27.
8
Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.作为强化频率函数的反应相对强度和绝对强度。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4(3):267-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267.
9
Effects of required rates of responding upon choice.反应要求速率对选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):15-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-15.
10
Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.作为离散试验选择因素的强化概率与延迟
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):341-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-341.

对条件强化的偏好。

Preference for conditioned reinforcement.

作者信息

Williams B A, Dunn R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0109.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):37-46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-37.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.1991.55-37
PMID:2002301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1322976/
Abstract

Pigeons were presented with a concurrent-chains schedule in which both choice alternatives led to the same terminal-link stimulus, which was followed by food. Superimposed on the food-reinforced presentations of the terminal-link stimulus was a second schedule of presentations of the same stimulus that were followed by no food. The absolute number of these no-food stimulus presentations was held constant while their relative frequency assigned to one or the other choice alternative was systematically varied. Preference for a given choice alternative tracked the relative frequency of these stimulus presentations, thus demonstrating that they served as reinforcers. These results resolve conflicts in the literature regarding the effect of conditioned reinforcement on choice.

摘要

给鸽子呈现一种并发链程序,其中两个选择项都通向相同的终端链接刺激,随后是食物。在终端链接刺激的食物强化呈现之上叠加了同一刺激的第二种呈现程序,这种呈现之后没有食物。这些无食物刺激呈现的绝对数量保持不变,而分配给其中一个或另一个选择项的相对频率则系统地变化。对给定选择项的偏好跟踪这些刺激呈现的相对频率,从而表明它们起到了强化物的作用。这些结果解决了文献中关于条件强化对选择的影响的冲突。