• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有不确定结果的选择:条件强化效应

Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.

作者信息

Dunn R, Spetch M L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, Calexico, California 92231.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):201-18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-201.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.1990.53-201
PMID:2324663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1323007/
Abstract

Pigeons responded on concurrent chains with equal initial- and terminal-link durations. In all conditions, the terminal links of one chain ended reliably in reinforcement; the terminal links on the alternative chain ended in either food or blackout. In Experiment 1, the terminal-link stimuli were correlated with (signaled) the outcome, and the durations of the initial and terminal links were varied across conditions. Preference did not vary systematically across conditions. In Experiment 2, terminal-link durations were varied under different stimulus conditions. The initial links were variable-interval 80-s schedules. Preference for the reliable alternative was generally higher in unsignaled than in signaled conditions. Preference increased with terminal-link durations only in the unsignaled conditions. There were no consistent differences between conditions with and without a common signal for reinforcement on the two chains. In the first series of conditions in Experiment 3, a single response was required in the initial links, and the stimulus conditions during 50-s terminal links were varied. Preference for the reliable outcome approached 1.0 in unsignaled conditions and was considerably lower (below .50 for 3 of 5 subjects) in signaled conditions. In a final series of signaled conditions with relatively long terminal links, preference varied with duration of the initial links. The results extend previous findings and are discussed in terms of the delay reduction signaled by terminal-link stimuli.

摘要

鸽子在初始链节和终端链节时长相等的并发链上做出反应。在所有条件下,一条链的终端链节可靠地以强化结束;另一条链的终端链节则以食物或停电结束。在实验1中,终端链节刺激与结果相关(发出信号),并且初始链节和终端链节的时长在不同条件下变化。偏好并未在不同条件下系统地变化。在实验2中,终端链节时长在不同刺激条件下变化。初始链节采用可变间隔80秒的时间表。在无信号条件下,对可靠选项的偏好通常高于有信号条件。仅在无信号条件下,偏好随终端链节时长增加。两条链上有强化共同信号和无强化共同信号的条件之间没有一致的差异。在实验3的第一组条件中,初始链节只需一次反应,50秒终端链节期间的刺激条件变化。在无信号条件下,对可靠结果的偏好接近1.0,而在有信号条件下则相当低(5名受试者中有3名低于0.50)。在最后一组有相对长终端链节的有信号条件下,偏好随初始链节的时长而变化。这些结果扩展了先前的发现,并根据终端链节刺激发出信号的延迟减少进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.具有不确定结果的选择:条件强化效应
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):201-18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-201.
2
Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.百分比强化程序中的次优选择:信号条件和终段长度的影响
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):219-34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-219.
3
Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.条件强化值与选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):155-75. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-155.
4
Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice.有信号与无信号强化延迟对选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Mar;75(2):165-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-165.
5
Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.在可靠和不可靠结果之间进行选择:并发链中的混合百分比强化
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jan;47(1):57-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-57.
6
Evidence against a constant-difference effect in concurrent-chains schedules.反对并发链程序中恒定差异效应的证据。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Mar;77(2):147-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-147.
7
The value hypothesis and acquisition of preference in concurrent chains.并发链中的价值假设与偏好习得
Anim Learn Behav. 2002 Feb;30(1):21-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03192906.
8
Signaled and unsignaled terminal links in concurrent chains I: effects of reinforcer probability and immediacy.并发链中的有信号和无信号终端链接 I:强化物概率和即时性的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):327-52. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-327.
9
Effects of primary reinforcement on pigeons' initial-link responding under a concurrent chains schedule with nondifferntial terminal links.在具有非差异终端链节的并发链程序下,初级强化对鸽子初始链节反应的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Jul;76(1):75-94. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-75.
10
Choice and conditioned reinforcement.选择与条件强化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):177-88. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-177.

引用本文的文献

1
Do goldfish like to be informed?金鱼喜欢被告知吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 May;292(2047):20242842. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2842. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Human Behavior in Suboptimal Choice Tasks: Defining Optimality.次优选择任务中的人类行为:界定最优性。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Jul 1;47(2):435-447. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00411-7. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Temporal context effects on suboptimal choice.时间背景对次优选择的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2737-2745. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02519-y. Epub 2024 May 17.
4
Paradoxical choice and the reinforcing value of information.矛盾选择与信息的强化价值。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):623-637. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01698-2. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
5
Forced-exposure trials increase suboptimal choice.强制暴露试验会增加次优选择。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1514-1523. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02092-2. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
6
The Relevance of Operant Behavior in Conceptualizing the Psychological Well-Being of Captive Animals.操作性行为在圈养动物心理健康概念化中的相关性
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Aug 10;43(3):617-654. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00259-7. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
The functional equivalence of two variants of the suboptimal choice task: choice proportion and response latency as measures of value.两种次优选择任务变体的功能等价性:选择比例和反应时作为价值的衡量标准。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jan;24(1):85-98. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01418-8. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
8
Outcome expectancy and suboptimal risky choice in nonhuman primates.非人类灵长类动物的结果预期与次优风险选择。
Learn Behav. 2020 Sep;48(3):301-321. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00406-4.
9
Human and pigeon suboptimal choice.人类和鸽子的次优选择。
Learn Behav. 2019 Dec;47(4):334-343. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00391-8.
10
Uncertainty processing in bees exposed to free choices: Lessons from vertebrates.暴露于自由选择环境中的蜜蜂的不确定性处理:来自脊椎动物的经验教训。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2024-2036. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1441-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Choice: A local analysis.选择:局部分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):383-405. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-383.
2
Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort.强化人类观察行为的刺激与消退或增加努力相关。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Nov;34(3):239-61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-239.
3
Uncertainty reduction, conditioned reinforcement, and observing.不确定性减少、条件强化和观察。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Jan;33(1):3-13. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-3.
4
Percentage reinforcement and choice.百分比强化与选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Nov;32(3):335-40. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-335.
5
Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement.强化时距选择和条件强化的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jan;29(1):77-86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-77.
6
Pigeons' preferences for stimulus information: effects of amount of information.鸽子对刺激信息的偏好:信息量的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):255-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-255.
7
Enhancement of conditioned reinforcement by uncertainty.增强不确定条件下的条件强化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Nov;24(3):311-4. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-311.
8
Average uncertainty as a determinant of observing behavior.平均不确定性作为观察行为的决定因素。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):401-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-401.
9
An appraisal of preference for multiple versus mixed schedules.对多重与混合时间表偏好的评估。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):31-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-31.
10
Preference for intermittent reinforcement.偏好间歇性强化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):463-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-463.