Roiblat H L, Bever T G, Helweg D A, Harley H E
University of Hawaii, Manoa.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1991 Jan;17(1):55-67. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.17.1.55.
Three groups of pigeons were trained to discriminate between a target temporal sequence, consisting of red, green, and blue, and distractor sequences consisting of all other combinations of these three colors presented on a pecking key. Response alternatives were provided during the course of the trial (on-line decisions) as well as the end of the trial (postsequence decisions). Different temporal phrasing patterns emphasized the first stimulus in the sequence, the final stimulus, or all stimuli equally. The phrasing pattern did not affect the speed of acquisition, but groups receiving emphasized stimuli relied more heavily on those stimuli than on the other stimuli for their discriminations. The patterns of both on-line choices during the sequence and terminal choices following the sequence were consistent with the use of hierarchical representations and inconsistent with a simple item-by-item prospective discrimination scheme.
三组鸽子接受训练,以区分由红色、绿色和蓝色组成的目标时间序列与由这三种颜色的所有其他组合在啄键上呈现的干扰序列。在试验过程中(在线决策)以及试验结束时(序列后决策)提供了反应选项。不同的时间措辞模式强调序列中的第一个刺激、最后一个刺激或所有刺激同等重要。措辞模式不影响习得速度,但接受强调刺激的组在进行辨别时更依赖这些刺激而非其他刺激。序列中的在线选择模式和序列后的最终选择模式均与使用层次表征一致,而与简单的逐项前瞻性辨别方案不一致。