Keen R, Machado A
Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Sep;72(2):151-75. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-151.
This study examined how pigeons discriminate the relative frequencies of events when the events occur serially. In a discrete-trials procedure, 6 pigeons were shown one light nf times and then another nl times. Next, they received food for choosing the light that had occurred the least number of times during the sample. At issue were (a) how the discrimination was related to two variables, the difference between the frequencies of the two lights, D = nf - nl, and the total number of lights in the sample, T = nf + nl; and (b) whether a simple mathematical model of the discrimination process could account for the data. In contrast with models that assume that pigeons count the stimulus lights, engage in mental arithmetic on numerons, or remember the number of stimuli, the present model assumed only that the influence of a sample stimulus on choice increases linearly when the stimulus is presented, but decays exponentially when the stimulus is absent. The results showed that, overall, the pigeons discriminated the relative frequencies well. Their accuracy always increased with the absolute value of the difference D and, for D > 0, it decreased with T. Performance also showed clear recency, primacy, and contextual effects. The model accounted well for the major trends in the data.
本研究考察了鸽子在事件连续发生时如何辨别事件的相对频率。在一个离散试验程序中,向6只鸽子展示一种灯光nf次,然后另一种灯光nl次。接下来,它们因选择样本中出现次数最少的灯光而获得食物。问题在于:(a)这种辨别如何与两个变量相关,即两种灯光频率的差异D = nf - nl,以及样本中灯光的总数T = nf + nl;(b)一个简单的辨别过程数学模型是否能够解释这些数据。与那些假设鸽子对刺激灯光进行计数、对数量进行心算或记住刺激数量的模型不同,本模型仅假设样本刺激对选择的影响在刺激呈现时线性增加,但在刺激不呈现时呈指数衰减。结果表明,总体而言,鸽子能很好地辨别相对频率。它们的准确性总是随着差异D的绝对值增加而提高,并且对于D > 0,随着T的增加而降低。表现还呈现出明显的近因效应、首因效应和情境效应。该模型很好地解释了数据中的主要趋势。