Shadmehr Azadeh, Hadian Mohmmad Reza, Naiemi Sedigheh Sadat, Jalaie Shohreh
Department of Physical Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2009;22(3):143-8. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2009-0227.
Research is limited and controversial on the effectiveness of various stretching methods on muscle lengthening.
Studying the effectiveness of static stretch and muscle energy technique on the flexibility of hamstring muscles.
Thirty young females (20-25 yrs old) participated voluntarily in this study. Subjects were randomly assigned to two groups: static stretch group (controls; n=15) and muscle energy technique (MET) group (experimental; n=15). The control group underwent ten sessions of static stretches of hamstring muscle, and the experimental group was assigned to ten sessions of MET at 50% voluntary isometric contraction. Hamstring flexibility was evaluated by passive knee extension test at baseline and again following interventions.
Both treatment methods were capable of significantly improving the shortness of hamstring muscles (P< 0.01); and no considerable difference was observed between the methods.
Ten sessions of hamstring stretches in normal young women using either static stretch or MET had similar effect on restoring flexibility to hamstrings.
关于各种拉伸方法对肌肉拉长效果的研究有限且存在争议。
研究静态拉伸和肌肉能量技术对腘绳肌柔韧性的效果。
30名年轻女性(20 - 25岁)自愿参与本研究。受试者被随机分为两组:静态拉伸组(对照组;n = 15)和肌肉能量技术(MET)组(实验组;n = 15)。对照组进行10次腘绳肌静态拉伸,实验组进行10次50%最大自主等长收缩的肌肉能量技术训练。在基线时以及干预后通过被动膝关节伸展试验评估腘绳肌柔韧性。
两种治疗方法均能显著改善腘绳肌的缩短情况(P < 0.01);且两种方法之间未观察到显著差异。
在正常年轻女性中,使用静态拉伸或肌肉能量技术进行10次腘绳肌拉伸对恢复腘绳肌柔韧性具有相似效果。