Varas-Díaz Nelson, Neilands Torsten B
Graduate School of Social Work Beatriz Lassalle, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR, Puerto Rico.
AIDS Care. 2009 Oct;21(10):1259-70. doi: 10.1080/09540120902804297.
HIV/AIDS stigma continues to be an obstacle for primary and secondary HIV prevention. Its consequences for the lives of people living with the disease have been well documented and continue to be of great concern for health care providers and researchers in the field. These consequences are worsened when such stigma emanates from health professionals, as this can limit access to services. One of the main obstacles for HIV/AIDS stigma research in Puerto Rico is the absence of quantitative measures to assess HIV/AIDS stigma manifestations among health professionals. In light of this gap in the scientific literature, the main objective of this study was to develop and test the psychometric properties of a culturally appropriate HIV/AIDS Stigma Scale for Puerto Rican health care providers and to develop a reduced form of the scale suitable for use in time-limited clinical settings. The developed measure was based on previous qualitative evidence gathered from Puerto Rican health professionals (Varas-Diaz, Serrano-Garcia, & Toro-Alfonso, 2005) and administered to a sample of 421 health professionals in training. The scale addresses 12 HIV/AIDS stigma dimensions. In quantitative analyses 11 of these dimensions demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability. These dimensions in turn were subcomponents of a higher-order general stigma factor. Implications and limitations of these findings are discussed.
对艾滋病毒/艾滋病的污名化仍然是艾滋病毒一级和二级预防的障碍。其对艾滋病患者生活的影响已有充分记录,并且仍然是该领域医疗服务提供者和研究人员极为关注的问题。当这种污名化来自卫生专业人员时,这些影响会更加严重,因为这可能会限制人们获得服务。波多黎各艾滋病毒/艾滋病污名研究的主要障碍之一是缺乏评估卫生专业人员中艾滋病毒/艾滋病污名表现的量化措施。鉴于科学文献中的这一空白,本研究的主要目的是开发并测试一种适合波多黎各医疗服务提供者文化背景的艾滋病毒/艾滋病污名量表的心理测量特性,并开发一种适合在时间有限的临床环境中使用的简化版量表。所开发的测量工具基于之前从波多黎各卫生专业人员那里收集到的定性证据(瓦拉斯 - 迪亚兹、塞拉诺 - 加西亚和托罗 - 阿方索,2005年),并应用于421名接受培训的卫生专业人员样本。该量表涉及12个艾滋病毒/艾滋病污名维度。在定量分析中,其中11个维度显示出令人满意的效度和信度。这些维度依次是一个更高层次的总体污名因素的子成分。本文讨论了这些研究结果的意义和局限性。