• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在体外研究乙撑亚胺诱导的小鼠雄性生殖细胞以及小鼠和人淋巴细胞中的 DNA 损伤。

In vitro investigations of glycidamide-induced DNA lesions in mouse male germ cells and in mouse and human lymphocytes.

机构信息

Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Environmental Medicine, Department of Chemical Toxicology, 0403 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 2010 Feb;696(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.12.012. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.12.012
PMID:20026424
Abstract

The industrial compound and food contaminant acrylamide (AA) is a probable human carcinogen, also known to induce male-mediated reproductive effects in animals. Most data suggest that its metabolite glycidamide (GA) is involved in the observed toxicity. We have investigated in vitro effects of AA/GA in mouse male germ cells (prior to spermatid elongation) and human and mouse peripheral blood lymphocytes, to assess inter-species and cell-type differences in susceptibility, and to explore the nature of the DNA lesion(s) as well as their potential repair. The comet assay was used in combination with the DNA-repair enzymes Fpg and hOGG1 to measure specific DNA lesions. In contrast to AA, GA induced significant levels of DNA lesions (strand breaks and alkali-labile sites) at millimolar concentrations in mouse testicular cells and human peripheral blood lymphocytes (hPBL). Using Fpg, the GA-induced DNA damage was measured at 20-50-fold higher sensitivity, in all cell types investigated. GA-induced DNA damage could not be recognised by hOGG1, suggesting that, based on the known affinities of these repair enzymes, alkylation of guanine is involved, rather than oxidation. Human lymphocytes appeared to be more susceptible to GA-induced lesions than both types of mouse cells. Mouse testicular cells and lymphocytes seemed to respond similarly to GA-induced Fpg-sensitive DNA lesions. The persistence of lesions was explored with cells from mice either proficient or deficient in Ogg1 (mouse 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase). Low in vitro repair of GA-induced Fpg-sensitive lesions was observed in primary male germ cells and lymphocytes from both Ogg1(+/+) and Ogg1(-/-) mice. We conclude that there may be differences between mice and humans in AA/GA-induced genotoxicity, and DNA from mouse male germ cells does not appear to be more sensitive to GA than DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes in vitro. The usefulness of the comet assay in combination with DNA-repair enzymes is demonstrated.

摘要

丙烯酰胺(AA)是一种工业化合物和食品污染物,也是一种可能的人类致癌物质,已知可诱导动物的雄性介导的生殖效应。大多数数据表明,其代谢物丙烯醛(GA)参与了观察到的毒性。我们已经研究了 AA/GA 在小鼠精原细胞(在精子伸长之前)和人外周血淋巴细胞中的体外效应,以评估种间和细胞类型的敏感性差异,并探讨 DNA 损伤的性质及其潜在的修复。彗星试验与 DNA 修复酶 Fpg 和 hOGG1 结合使用,以测量特定的 DNA 损伤。与 AA 相反,GA 在毫摩尔浓度下在小鼠睾丸细胞和人外周血淋巴细胞(hPBL)中诱导显著水平的 DNA 损伤(链断裂和碱不稳定位点)。使用 Fpg,在所有研究的细胞类型中,GA 诱导的 DNA 损伤的检测灵敏度提高了 20-50 倍。GA 诱导的 DNA 损伤不能被 hOGG1 识别,这表明,基于这些修复酶的已知亲和力,涉及鸟嘌呤的烷基化,而不是氧化。人外周血淋巴细胞似乎比两种类型的小鼠细胞对 GA 诱导的损伤更敏感。GA 诱导的 Fpg 敏感 DNA 损伤在小鼠睾丸细胞和淋巴细胞中似乎具有相似的反应。用 Ogg1(+/+)和 Ogg1(-/-)小鼠的雄性生殖细胞和淋巴细胞研究了细胞中损伤的持久性。在体外,在 Ogg1(+/+)和 Ogg1(-/-)小鼠的初级精原细胞和淋巴细胞中观察到 GA 诱导的 Fpg 敏感损伤的低修复。我们得出的结论是,AA/GA 诱导的遗传毒性可能存在小鼠和人类之间的差异,并且来自雄性生殖细胞的 DNA 似乎不比来自外周血淋巴细胞的 DNA 对 GA 更敏感。证明了彗星试验与 DNA 修复酶结合使用的有用性。

相似文献

1
In vitro investigations of glycidamide-induced DNA lesions in mouse male germ cells and in mouse and human lymphocytes.在体外研究乙撑亚胺诱导的小鼠雄性生殖细胞以及小鼠和人淋巴细胞中的 DNA 损伤。
Mutat Res. 2010 Feb;696(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.12.012. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
2
Using the comet assay and lysis conditions to characterize DNA lesions from the acrylamide metabolite glycidamide.利用彗星试验和裂解条件来表征丙烯酰胺代谢物环氧丙酰胺造成的DNA损伤。
Mutagenesis. 2018 Feb 24;33(1):31-39. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gex036.
3
Induction of sister chromatid exchange by acrylamide and glycidamide in human lymphocytes: role of polymorphisms in detoxification and DNA-repair genes in the genotoxicity of glycidamide.丙烯酰胺和缩水甘油酰胺在人淋巴细胞中诱导姐妹染色单体交换:解毒和 DNA 修复基因多态性在缩水甘油酰胺遗传毒性中的作用。
Mutat Res. 2013 Apr 15;752(1-2):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.12.013. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
4
Genotoxicity of glycidamide in comparison to 3-N-nitroso-oxazolidin-2-one.与3-N-亚硝基-恶唑烷-2-酮相比,缩水甘油酰胺的遗传毒性。
J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Aug 13;56(15):5989-93. doi: 10.1021/jf703741a. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
5
Cytogenetic damage induced by acrylamide and glycidamide in mammalian cells: correlation with specific glycidamide-DNA adducts.丙烯酰胺和缩水甘油酰胺在哺乳动物细胞中诱导的细胞遗传学损伤:与特定的缩水甘油酰胺-DNA加合物的相关性。
Toxicol Sci. 2007 Feb;95(2):383-90. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl155. Epub 2006 Nov 6.
6
DNA strand breaking capacity of acrylamide and glycidamide in mammalian cells.丙烯酰胺和缩水甘油酰胺在哺乳动物细胞中的DNA链断裂能力。
Mutat Res. 2005 Feb 7;580(1-2):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.11.009.
7
Acrylamide and glycidamide: genotoxic effects in V79-cells and human blood.丙烯酰胺和缩水甘油酰胺:对V79细胞和人体血液的遗传毒性作用
Mutat Res. 2005 Feb 7;580(1-2):61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.11.007.
8
Genotoxicity of acrylamide and its metabolite glycidamide administered in drinking water to male and female Big Blue mice.饮用水中丙烯酰胺及其代谢产物环氧丙酰胺对雄性和雌性大蓝鼠的遗传毒性。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2006 Jan;47(1):6-17. doi: 10.1002/em.20157.
9
Genetic polymorphisms in detoxification and DNA repair genes and susceptibility to glycidamide-induced DNA damage.解毒和 DNA 修复基因的遗传多态性与丙烯酰胺诱导的 DNA 损伤易感性。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2012;75(13-15):920-33. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2012.690709.
10
Genotoxicity of acrylamide and glycidamide in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells.丙烯酰胺和缩水甘油酰胺对人淋巴母细胞TK6细胞的遗传毒性
Mutat Res. 2006 Feb 28;603(2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.11.006. Epub 2006 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Obesity Induces DNA Damage in Mammary Epithelial Cells Exacerbated by Acrylamide Treatment through CYP2E1-Mediated Oxidative Stress.肥胖通过CYP2E1介导的氧化应激诱导乳腺上皮细胞DNA损伤,丙烯酰胺处理会加剧这种损伤。
Toxics. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):484. doi: 10.3390/toxics12070484.
2
Glycidamide-induced hypermutation in yeast single-stranded DNA reveals a ubiquitous clock-like mutational motif in humans.在酵母单链 DNA 中,缩水甘油酰胺诱导的超突变揭示了人类中普遍存在的类似时钟的突变模式。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 Sep 22;51(17):9075-9100. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad611.
3
Evaluation of mutagenic susceptibility of different stages in germ cell development of Caenorhabditis elegans using whole genome sequencing.
利用全基因组测序评估秀丽隐杆线虫生殖细胞发育不同阶段的诱变易感性。
Arch Toxicol. 2023 Aug;97(8):2261-2272. doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03526-z. Epub 2023 May 20.
4
Production and Inhibition of Acrylamide during Coffee Processing: A Literature Review.咖啡加工过程中丙烯酰胺的生成与抑制:文献综述。
Molecules. 2023 Apr 14;28(8):3476. doi: 10.3390/molecules28083476.
5
NEIL1 and NEIL2 DNA glycosylases modulate anxiety and learning in a cooperative manner in mice.尼尔1和尼尔2 DNA糖基化酶以协同方式调节小鼠的焦虑和学习能力。
Commun Biol. 2021 Dec 2;4(1):1354. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02864-x.
6
Validation of the in vitro comet assay for DNA cross-links and altered bases detection.验证体外彗星试验检测 DNA 交联和碱基改变。
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Aug;95(8):2825-2838. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03102-3. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
7
Benzo[a]pyrene and Caenorhabditis elegans: defining the genotoxic potential in an organism lacking the classical CYP1A1 pathway.苯并[a]芘与秀丽隐杆线虫:在缺乏经典 CYP1A1 途径的生物体中定义遗传毒性潜力。
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Mar;95(3):1055-1069. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02968-z. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
8
Cinnamon extract supplementation improves inflammation and oxidative stress induced by acrylamide: An experimental animal study.肉桂提取物补充剂可改善丙烯酰胺诱导的炎症和氧化应激:一项实验动物研究。
Avicenna J Phytomed. 2020 May-Jun;10(3):243-252.
9
Restoration of Cognitive Performance in Mice Carrying a Deficient Allele of 8-Oxoguanine DNA Glycosylase by X-ray Irradiation.X 射线照射恢复携带 8-氧鸟嘌呤 DNA 糖基化酶缺陷等位基因的小鼠的认知表现。
Neurotox Res. 2018 May;33(4):824-836. doi: 10.1007/s12640-017-9833-7. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
10
Mechanisms linked to differences in the mutagenic potential of 1,3-dinitropyrene and 1,8-dinitropyrene.与1,3-二硝基芘和1,8-二硝基芘诱变潜力差异相关的机制。
Toxicol Rep. 2014 Jul 27;1:459-473. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.07.009. eCollection 2014.