School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Fam Pract. 2010 Apr;27(2):186-91. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp095. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
Asthma is a common and important health condition in the UK, predominantly managed in primary care. Little is known about how characteristics of practices and patients are associated with achievement of quality indicators (QIs) for asthma.
To measure the recorded quality of primary care for asthma and to assess whether quality of care differed by patient and practice characteristics.
Medical records were examined for 253 randomly selected asthma patients from 18 general practices in England. Quality of care was assessed against seven predetermined QIs. Logistic regression models were used to test variations in quality of care by age, gender, patient postcode deprivation rank, practice size and time point.
There was substantial variation in achievement of individual QIs (range 39-97%). Participants whose postcodes were in the most deprived areas were more likely to be asked about difficulties sleeping [odds ratios (ORs) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.5] or whether asthma interfered with daily activities (OR 1.8, CI 1.2-2.7) than those from middle or least deprived postcode areas. QIs were more likely to be achieved in 2005 than 2003 (ORs 4.4, 2.4, 3.0). There were no significant differences by other characteristics.
Great variations exist in the quality of primary care for asthma and considerable scope for improvement. Asthma care improved over time. The preliminary findings that quality of asthma care varied with deprivation support the idea that primary care may be targeting care to those in most need. However, variations were small and only significant for two QIs.
哮喘是英国常见且重要的健康问题,主要在初级保健中进行管理。对于实践和患者的特征如何与哮喘质量指标(QIs)的实现相关,知之甚少。
衡量初级保健治疗哮喘的记录质量,并评估护理质量是否因患者和实践特征而异。
从英格兰 18 家普通诊所中随机抽取了 253 名哮喘患者的医疗记录进行研究。根据七个预定的 QIs 评估护理质量。使用逻辑回归模型检验了年龄、性别、患者邮政编码贫困等级、实践规模和时间点等因素对护理质量的变化。
个别 QIs 的实现情况存在很大差异(范围为 39%-97%)。居住在最贫困地区的患者更有可能被问及睡眠困难[比值比(ORs)1.7,95%置信区间(CI)1.2-2.5]或哮喘是否影响日常活动(OR 1.8,CI 1.2-2.7),而不是来自中等或最贫困邮政编码地区的患者。2005 年比 2003 年更有可能实现 QIs(ORs 4.4、2.4、3.0)。其他特征没有显著差异。
哮喘初级保健的质量存在很大差异,有很大的改进空间。哮喘护理随着时间的推移而改善。哮喘护理质量随贫困程度而变化的初步发现支持了初级保健可能针对最需要的人群提供护理的观点。然而,差异很小,仅对两个 QIs 有显著影响。