Suppr超能文献

咪喹莫特或氟尿嘧啶局部治疗基底细胞癌和鳞状细胞癌:一项系统评价

Topical imiquimod or fluorouracil therapy for basal and squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review.

作者信息

Love W Elliot, Bernhard Jeffrey D, Bordeaux Jeremy S

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol. 2009 Dec;145(12):1431-8. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.291.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review to determine clearance rates and adverse effects of topical imiquimod or fluorouracil therapy in the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancers such as basal (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and to develop recommendations for the use of topical imiquimod or fluorouracil to treat BCC and SCC.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, and Cochrane databases.

STUDY SELECTION

Prospective, retrospective, and case studies in English containing a minimum of 4 subjects and a 6-month follow-up or posttreatment histologic evaluation.

DATA EXTRACTION

We calculated the rate of clearance and adverse effects for BCC subtypes and invasive and in situ SCC treated with topical imiquimod or fluorouracil.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Clearance rates varied by drug regimen, and most of the studies lacked long-term follow-up. Imiquimod use produced the following clearance rates: 43% to 100% for superficial BCC, 42% to 100% for nodular BCC, 56% to 63% for infiltrative BCC, 73% to 88% for SCC in situ, and 71% for invasive SCC. Fluorouracil use produced the following clearance rates: 90% for superficial BCC and 27% to 85% for SCC in situ. Up to 100% and 97% of patients applying imiquimod and fluorouracil, respectively, experienced at least 1 adverse event. Adverse event intensity ranged from mild to severe; erythema, pruritus, and pain were common.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supports the use of topical imiquimod as monotherapy for superficial BCC and topical fluorouracil as monotherapy for superficial BCC and SCC in situ. Based on the available evidence, the strength of any recommendations for the use of these 2 agents in the primary treatment of these tumors is weak. We recommend that their use be limited to patients with small tumors in low-risk locations who will not or cannot undergo treatment with better-established therapies for which long-term clearance rates have been determined. Long-term clinical follow-up is essential for patients treated with topical imiquimod or fluorouracil. Limitations of therapy include high rates of adverse effects, lower clearance rates than other treatment modalities, dependence on patient adherence to treatment, and higher costs than other therapies.

摘要

目的

进行一项系统评价,以确定局部应用咪喹莫特或氟尿嘧啶治疗基底细胞癌(BCC)和鳞状细胞癌(SCC)等非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的清除率和不良反应,并就局部应用咪喹莫特或氟尿嘧啶治疗BCC和SCC制定使用建议。

数据来源

MEDLINE、CANCERLIT和Cochrane数据库。

研究选择

英文的前瞻性、回顾性和病例研究,至少包含4名受试者,并进行6个月的随访或治疗后组织学评估。

数据提取

我们计算了局部应用咪喹莫特或氟尿嘧啶治疗的BCC亚型、浸润性和原位SCC的清除率和不良反应。

数据综合

清除率因药物方案而异,且大多数研究缺乏长期随访。使用咪喹莫特的清除率如下:浅表性BCC为43%至100%,结节性BCC为42%至100%,浸润性BCC为56%至63%,原位SCC为73%至88%,浸润性SCC为71%。使用氟尿嘧啶的清除率如下:浅表性BCC为90%,原位SCC为27%至85%。分别有高达100%和97%应用咪喹莫特和氟尿嘧啶的患者经历了至少1次不良事件。不良事件强度从轻度到重度不等;红斑、瘙痒和疼痛较为常见。

结论

有证据支持局部应用咪喹莫特作为浅表性BCC的单一疗法,以及局部应用氟尿嘧啶作为浅表性BCC和原位SCC的单一疗法。基于现有证据,关于这两种药物在这些肿瘤的一线治疗中使用的任何建议的力度都较弱。我们建议,它们的使用应限于肿瘤较小、位于低风险部位且不会或不能接受已确定长期清除率的更成熟疗法治疗的患者。对于接受局部咪喹莫特或氟尿嘧啶治疗的患者,长期临床随访至关重要。治疗的局限性包括不良反应发生率高、清除率低于其他治疗方式、依赖患者坚持治疗以及成本高于其他疗法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验