• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

accountable care organization(ACO)模式:成功的基石

The Accountable Care Organization (ACO) model: building blocks for success.

作者信息

Lowell Kristina Hanson, Bertko John

机构信息

Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform,The Brookings Institution, Washington, District of Columbia 20036, USA.

出版信息

J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):81-8. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181c9fb12.

DOI:10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181c9fb12
PMID:20027005
Abstract

The Accountable Care Organization (ACO) model has received significant attention among policymakers and leaders in the healthcare community in the context of the ongoing debate over health reform, not only because of the unsustainable path on which the country now finds itself but also because it directly focuses on what must be a key goal of the healthcare system: higher value. The model offers a promising approach for achieving this goal. This article provides an overview of the ACO model and its role in the current policy context, highlights the key elements that will be common to all ACOs, and provides details of several challenges that may arise throughout the implementation process, including a host of technical, legal, and operational challenges. These challenges range from issues such as the organizational form and management of the ACO to analytic challenges such as the calculation of spending benchmarks and the selection of quality measures.

摘要

在当前关于医疗改革的持续辩论背景下, accountable care organization(ACO)模式受到了医疗保健界政策制定者和领导者的极大关注。这不仅是因为该国目前所处的不可持续道路,还因为它直接聚焦于医疗保健系统的一个关键目标:更高的价值。该模式为实现这一目标提供了一种有前景的方法。本文概述了ACO模式及其在当前政策背景下的作用,强调了所有ACO共有的关键要素,并详细阐述了在实施过程中可能出现的若干挑战,包括一系列技术、法律和运营挑战。这些挑战涵盖了从ACO的组织形式和管理等问题到诸如支出基准计算和质量指标选择等分析挑战。

相似文献

1
The Accountable Care Organization (ACO) model: building blocks for success.accountable care organization(ACO)模式:成功的基石
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):81-8. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181c9fb12.
2
Getting from here to there in payment reform: necessary practices and policies.实现支付改革的目标:必要的实践与政策。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):52-7; discussion 69-70. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181c9f5aa.
3
Commentary: health care payment reform and academic medicine: threat or opportunity?述评:医疗保健支付方式改革与学术医学:威胁还是机遇?
Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):756-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d0fdfb.
4
Comment on "Achieving cost control, care coordination, and quality improvement through incremental payment system reform".关于《通过增量支付系统改革实现成本控制、医疗协调与质量提升》的评论
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):58; discussion 69-70. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181c9fc20.
5
Guiding principles for payment system reform: commentary on "Achieving cost control, care coordination, and quality improvement through incremental payment system reform".支付系统改革的指导原则:对《通过渐进式支付系统改革实现成本控制、医疗协调与质量提升》的评论
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):29-34; discussion 69-70. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181c9f501.
6
Maryland's approach in enhancing effectiveness and efficiency in healthcare delivery: comment on "Achieving cost control, care coordination, and quality improvement through incremental payment system reform".马里兰州提高医疗服务有效性和效率的方法:评《通过渐进式支付系统改革实现成本控制、医疗协调与质量提升》
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):61-8; discussion 69-70. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181c9fc7b.
7
Managing the risks of accountable care.管理责任医疗的风险。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2011 Jul;65(7):48-52, 54, 56.
8
Achieving cost control, care coordination, and quality improvement through incremental payment system reform.通过增量支付系统改革实现成本控制、医疗协调和质量提升。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):2-23. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181c9f437.
9
Move to accountable care puts case managers in the spotlight.向责任医疗的转变将病例管理人员置于聚光灯下。
Hosp Case Manag. 2011 Sep;19(9):129-31.
10
The group employed model as a foundation for health care delivery reform.该团队采用该模式作为医疗保健服务改革的基础。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2010 Apr;83:1-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Reducing Admission Rates for Diabetes Ketoacidosis.小儿1型糖尿病:降低糖尿病酮症酸中毒的住院率
Qual Manag Health Care. 2016 Oct/Dec;25(4):231-237. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000109.
2
2-Year BMI Changes of Children Referred for Multidisciplinary Weight Management.接受多学科体重管理的儿童的两年体重指数变化
Int J Pediatr. 2014;2014:152586. doi: 10.1155/2014/152586. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
3
Root cause analysis reports help identify common factors in delayed diagnosis and treatment of outpatients.根本原因分析报告有助于识别门诊延迟诊断和治疗的常见因素。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1368-75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0130.