The American University in Cairo, Egypt.
Transcult Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;46(4):672-94. doi: 10.1177/1363461509351390.
Egyptian society is engaged in a culture-wide debate over definitions of abnormality, local constructions of which are rooted in ideas about the body and the soul in relation to society as a whole. This is reflected in the continuing recourse to religious healers or texts, as well as in heated debates over the moral, social, religious and legal status of religious healers, in particular the relatively recent and more orthodox "Qur'anic healers." The present study used a primarily qualitative analysis of Egyptian newspaper articles to explore media portrayals of this debate with a focus on how these contradictory cultural themes are situated and contested. The results show that psychiatric hegemony is reflected in media language that gives primacy to certain discourses over others, but that religious healing and religion in general exert an equal, if not more powerful influence on the form of these media portrayals. Different strategies used to negotiate the tensions between Qur'anic healing and psychiatry by those on both sides of the argument come across in the ways these arguments are portrayed in the media.
埃及社会正在就异常的定义进行一场全文化范围的辩论,这种定义根植于关于身体和灵魂与整个社会的关系的观念。这反映在持续诉诸宗教治疗师或经文,以及在宗教治疗师的道德、社会、宗教和法律地位方面的激烈辩论中,特别是最近更正统的“古兰经治疗师”。本研究主要通过对埃及报纸文章的定性分析,探讨了媒体对这场辩论的描述,重点关注这些矛盾的文化主题是如何被定位和争论的。结果表明,精神医学霸权反映在媒体语言中,即某些话语优先于其他话语,但宗教治疗和一般宗教对这些媒体描述的形式也产生了同等的,如果不是更强大的影响。争论双方在古兰经治疗和精神病学之间的紧张关系上使用的不同策略,体现在媒体对这些论点的描述方式上。