Department of Information Management, Nanjing University, China.
J Chem Inf Model. 2010 Jan;50(1):22-9. doi: 10.1021/ci9003199.
This paper reports a bibliometric analysis of the impact of research in China on cyclization, MALDI-TOF, and antibiotics, comparing this research with that in the USA, Germany, and Japan. It is shown that the productivity of the Chinese research (in terms of numbers of publications) is growing rapidly; however, this growth has not, to date, been accompanied by an analogous growth in impact (in terms of citations to the published work). A citation analysis of national and international collaboration patterns shows that collaborative research does not invariably result in a larger number of citations; in part, at least, this is shown to be due to the dominant role played by the publications of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
本文对中国在环化、MALDI-TOF 和抗生素研究方面的影响进行了文献计量分析，并将其与美国、德国和日本的研究进行了比较。结果表明，中国研究的生产力（以出版物数量衡量）增长迅速；然而，到目前为止，这种增长并没有伴随着类似的影响力（以发表工作的引用次数衡量）的增长。对国家和国际合作模式的引文分析表明，合作研究并不一定会导致更多的引用；至少部分原因是中国科学院的出版物占据主导地位。
