Suppr超能文献

在家中或特殊住所接受长期护理的人群对医疗保健的利用情况。

Utilization of medical healthcare among people receiving long-term care at home or in special accommodation.

作者信息

Condelius Anna, Edberg Anna-Karin, Hallberg Ingalill Rahm, Jakobsson Ulf

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2010 Jun;24(2):404-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00725.x. Epub 2009 Dec 20.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the utilization of medical healthcare, hospital care and outpatient care, during a 1-year period in relation to informal care, multimorbidity, functional status and health complaints and to long-term care at home or in special accommodation among people aged 65+, with one or more hospital admissions and receiving long-term care.

METHOD

A total of 694 people receiving long-term care during the year 2001 were studied. Data were collected by means of the administrative registers Patient Administrative Support in Skåne and PrivaStat and through the study Good Ageing in Skåne. Those at home and those in special accommodation were compared regarding utilization of medical healthcare, informal care, multimorbidity, functional status and health complaints. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using at home vs. in special accommodation as the dependent variable and also two multiple linear regression analyses using the number of hospital stays and the number of contacts with the physician in outpatient care separately as dependent variables.

FINDINGS

Those at home were significantly younger (mean age: 81 vs. 84 years) and less dependent in personal and instrumental activities of daily living (PADL/IADL) than those in special accommodation. A larger proportion of those at home was admitted to hospital three times or more (21 vs. 14%) and they had significantly more contacts with physicians in outpatient care (md: 10 vs. md: 7). Informal care was associated with care at home (OR = 0.074) and with utilization of outpatient care (B = 2.045). Dependency in PADL was associated with care in special accommodation (OR = 1.375) and with utilization of hospital care (B = -0.060) and outpatient care (B = -0.581).

CONCLUSION

Medical healthcare seems more accessible to those who live at home are younger, less dependent and who have access to informal caregivers.

摘要

目的

调查65岁及以上、有过一次或多次住院经历且正在接受长期护理的人群在一年时间内医疗保健、住院护理和门诊护理的使用情况,及其与非正式护理、多种疾病共存、功能状态、健康投诉以及居家或特殊住所长期护理之间的关系。

方法

对2001年期间接受长期护理的694人进行了研究。数据通过斯科讷地区患者管理支持系统和PrivaStat行政登记以及“斯科讷地区健康老龄化”研究收集。比较了居家和居住在特殊住所的人群在医疗保健使用、非正式护理、多种疾病共存、功能状态和健康投诉方面的情况。以居家或特殊住所为因变量进行了多重逻辑回归分析,还分别以住院次数和门诊护理中与医生的接触次数为因变量进行了两次多重线性回归分析。

结果

与居住在特殊住所的人相比,居家的人明显更年轻(平均年龄:81岁对84岁),在日常生活个人和工具性活动(PADL/IADL)方面的依赖性更低。居家的人中有更大比例(21%对14%)住院三次或更多次,且他们在门诊护理中与医生的接触明显更多(中位数:10次对中位数:7次)。非正式护理与居家护理相关(比值比=0.074)以及与门诊护理的使用相关(回归系数=2.045)。PADL方面的依赖性与特殊住所护理相关(比值比=1.375)以及与住院护理的使用相关(回归系数=-0.060)和门诊护理的使用相关(回归系数=-0.581)。

结论

对于那些居家居住、更年轻、依赖性更低且有非正式护理人员的人来说,医疗保健似乎更容易获得。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验